Exhibit 8-3. Drone Case Power Diagram This was from a case involving regulation of the drone industry in the US and Europe. Note (1) the predisposition of actors (+, 0 or -, depending on their support for the AUVSI) and (2) the labeling of each relationship in terms of potential/actual power; and (3) when there are two-way relationships, you need to show two separate arrows, as the power of A>B is not equal to the power of B>A. This case was unusual in that there were numerous two-way, reciprocal relationships, none of which the student rated to be low in potential or actual power. This is not common. Students tend toward overkill—showing multiple 2-way relationships when in fact many are just one-way. US Congress −,+ Med/med Med/med Hi/med Med/med Med/med Med/lo Med/lo Med/lo Med/lo Med/med Hi/med Hi/med Hi/med Hi/med Med/med Med/med Lo/lo Med/med Hi/med Hi/med Hi/med Med/med Lo/lo Task Force − US Forest Service − Federal Aviation Administration − Academy of Model Aeronautics + European Commission −,+ European Aviation Agency (EASA) −,+ European Organisation for Civil Aviation Equipment (EUROCAE) 0 Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) + Most likely scenario (See Module 9): Forest service influences FAA Task force and FAA do not start the registering of drones FAA fines people for misuse of drones AUVSI lobbies US Congress and Academy “Know before you fly” project is underway AUVSI lobbies European Commission and EUROCAE Increase in safety of public Growth of the drones market Amendments to “aviation package” are made Sale of drones continues increasing