titlemaster_med Ishikawa fishbone diagram Skorkovský ESF MU KPH Introduction (FBD= fishbone diagram) nFDB is a tool to find out relationships: n n n nUse in QM especially in automotive industry nOn of the tool set used to create so called 8D report (8 disciplines=FBD+5WHYs+PA+QM) nAnother tool : 5 WHYs – will be cleared later Another tool : PARETO=PA analysis will be shown later n n Effect Cause Fishbone diagram Dissatisfied worker Machines Management Mother Nature Men (Methods, Material, Manpower, Measurement, Machines, Mother Nature,Management) Training Salary Obsolete Dangerous Treacherous Incapable To hot Terrible cold Some chosen problems which could be find out during ERP support process I nlong response time to requirements nrequirement is directed to unsuitable consultant nbad documentation about service action (poor log) npeople ask repeatedly same questions at different moments and different consultants are asked nsolution of disputes :complaint- standard service npayment asked for supplied services 1.how much (to whom, type of task, type of the error- see diagram 2.starting time for invoiced services, response time 1.requirement is handed over till the problem is solved 2.time of starting solving -solved 3.start of implementaion of the bad object till end of testing 4.training 5. l nbad training methodology nbad consultants nbad communication protocol 1.telephone 2.e-mail 3.SKYPE nlack of interest of the management of both parties nright specification of reaction time nspecification to the error types and related response times l nresponse time of the distributor (ERP integrator ERP) n n 1. n Some chosen problems which could be find out during ERP support process II Diagram – response time handed over requirement find suitable resource (K1) K1 starts solving K1 solved K1 did not solved K1 handed over to distributor (D) D started work D solved the problem D ->K1 K1 handed over to customer RESPONSE TIME RESPONSE TIME II = active work = idle time Telephone call Fishbone diagram-support Dissatisfied customer Machines Management Mother Nature Men (Methods, Material, Manpower, Measurement, Machines) Phlegmatic person reacts later than expected Bad SW for support (HELP DESK) Bad communication Interest in golf only Incapable Consultant is on sick leave Consultant takes holiday Lower quality of the consultants heart of the problem Toy-Poodle-For-Sale Fishbone diagram-SA Project Backbone Project can be delayed Interpersonal communication Management of the project Mother Nature Men (Methods, Material, Manpower, Measurement, Machines) A lot of new functions were not implemented in prototype Communication betwwen department managers is insufficient Low Budget Not agile project management Consultant is on sick leave Servers in Czech Republic are inaccessible Lower level of understanding Storms Cost world beats Throughput world No el. generators Another example of Ishikawa I. AOMA - Ishikawa Resource : Seminar work 2015- Ing. Martin Lofaj Another example of Ishikawa II. Resource : Seminar work 2015- Tugulea Lilia Inequality Communication People Management Our representatives Mass media are mostly control We need to control resources of the country for long time Dictatorship Lack of Education Society system Can be corrupted They are more thinking to them than others Weights: 1 – 10 (1 lowest; 10 highest) in terms of importance 8 5 9 4 Are made stupid and blind Society system War means Money and resources 8 4 War Resource : Seminar work 2015 Mark Mason Bachasson de Montavilet Dissatisfied employee I Dissatisfied employee II 5WHYs nWHY 1 :Why my car had stopped ? nNo petrol in tank nWHY 2 :Why i did not have a petrol in my tank ? nI did not buy in the morning on my way to work WHY 3 :Why i did not buy a petrol ? nNo money in my pockets nWHY 4 : Why no money i my pockets? nEvening poker nWHY 5 : Why i did not win a poker game? nI do not know how to bluff! n 5WHYs w-you're-bluffing%20(2) no%2520petrol Cause Effect TQM and Ishikawa FBD and Pareto 80|20 Reject type (effects); Reason 1 (cause) Reason 2 (cause) Reason 3 (cause) Reason 4 (cause) L19 8 9 2 4 L20 0 1 4 6 L21 7 2 3 5 Manual for urgent reject cause elimination (to establish correct priority of remedy actions) Score Inventory Suppliers Machines Measurement Every reject type ->one Ishikawa diagram (electronic version) Reject statistics Filter date Filter Item Rejects Total Bad size, rusty, overflow, bad colour,… Pareto tool : What is it ? ntool to specify priorities nwhich job have to be done earlier than the others nwhich rejects must be solved firstly nwhich product gives us the biggest revenues n80|20 rule ANd9GcTzJeAdrie8R9dVQP2kSl89OVU_Y48AZbOkaNuyAMf_afC4wHSwyQ Soubor:Vilfredo Pareto.jpg 3086983 Pareto chart : possibility to split up reject and setup priorities Lorenz curve High priorities See next slide to understand the way how to construct Lorenz curve How to construct Lorenz Curve and Pareto chart nlist of causes (type of rejects) in % ntable where the most frequent cause is always on the left side of the graph n n Reject Type Importance Importance (%) Accumulative (%) 1 Bad size 10 71% 71 %=71% 2 Bad material 3 21 % 92%=71%+21% 3 Rust 1 8% 100 %=92%+8% Comment 1 : 10+3+1=14 Comment 2 : 71 % = 10/14; 21%=3/14 ….. Pareto chart- possibility to split up reject and setup priorities Lorenz curve High priorities 71% 21% 8% 92% 100% Pareto analysis per every type of reject – next step ->practical example of Pareto use in ERP MS Dynamics NAV 21 Type of reject Cause 1 Cause 2 Cause 3 Cause 4 Cause 5 Cause 6 Total L1 7 2 4 1 8 0 22 L2 2 4 6 8 0 9 29 =(8/22 L3 4 0 0 5 6 7 22 L4 5 7 2 0 1 3 18 =(7/22) L5 0 2 7 3 0 1 13 L6 9 7 5 2 3 6 32 =(4/22) L7 0 7 0 2 3 4 16 L8 1 8 6 2 4 0 21 =(2/22) L9 2 0 5 7 1 4 19 =(2/22) L10 7 2 8 9 7 5 38 C C5 % C1 % C3 % C2 % C4 % C6% L1 36,36 31,82 18,18 9,09 4,55 0,00 100 Lorenz curve 36,36 68,18 86,36 95,45 100,00 Higher priorities for reject type L1 36,36 36,36 + 31,82 We need to improve (remedy) firstly causes C5 a C1 !!! C5 8 36,36 C1 7 31,82 C3 4 18,18 C2 2 9,09 C4 2 4,55 Pareto analysis II - data nDifficulty nResignation nUnderestimation nLow motivation n6 - (35,29 )- (35,29) n5 - ( 29,41 )- (64,71) n4 - ( 23,53 )- (88,24) n2 - ( 11,76 )- (100,00) n Frequency Freq (%) Freq accum(%) Pareto analysis II Pareto analysis II Evaluation of set of rejects nEvery reject is assigned to one Ishikawa tree nEvery tree with empty table is handed over to chosen company of responsible experts nAll tables are collected and evaluated nSee example with two rejects and two experts 1. l Domain Machines Input control Setup Routing Method Breakdowns Workers Measurment Reject code L1 3,5 9 6,5 2 2,5 6 3 1,5 L2 9,5 2,5 2 5,5 6 8 3,5 2,5 Expert Reject John L1 3 8 9 3 2 7 2 1 Linda L1 4 10 4 1 3 5 4 2 Expert Reject John L2 9 3 3 5 7 8 4 3 Linda L2 10 2 1 6 5 8 3 2 Current Reality Tree and Ishikava (Pareto) Cost Worlds Tendency No investment in software Inefficient communication tool (SW) Late assignment of tasks to resources No workflow software (method and tool) Overburdened resources Bad multitasking Outdated project management method (SW) Tasks are delayed Project is late and overspend budget 4 3 2 1 9 8 6 7 10 11 Customer is unhappy 12 SW=software 1 = Management 2 = Methodology 3 = Men 4 = Machine (SW) 12 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 7 4 6 1 2 3 4 6 7 John 8 7 4 3 5 6 Caroline 9 5 7 8 5 6 Mean 8,5 6 5,5 5,5 5 6 Example 1 [USEMAP] Conclusion Type Problem Analysis Definition A visualization of the causes of a problem. Also Known As Ishikawa Diagram Invented By Kaoru Ishikawa Related Concepts Problem Analysis » Root Cause » Human Error » Internal Controls » Production Line » Root Cause Analysis » Vilfredo Pareto.jpg Vilfredo Pareto in person… https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT5y_pLtbBFF1mgph8SnJRE7-vVI_sszR2h8_rkBzQEEf3 bGmwlNg Akira Ishikawa in person…