Labour market and unemployment in the Czech Republic during the transition process • Labour market – the initial stage • General characteristics of the LM in the 1990´s • Labour mobility • Educational structure • Economic activity of the LFS • Labour productivity and wages • Unemployment Labour market – the initial stage – LM in the socialist Czechoslovakia • the rate of UNE was officially 0 % - UNE in market economies as a proof of market economy inefficiency • to be unemployed = a criminal offence of “parasitism” • the system of “alocation vouchers” • wage motivation limited with breaking the central plan → • → quantity instead of quality • wages many times as a substitute of the social benefits Employment structure in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland in 1990 (in % of total employment) Labour market – the initial stage – 1990 • broad amnesty • decreasing the over-employment • collapse of east European markets • legislative changes (the possibility to register at the Labour Office to get social benefits) unemployment as a new phenomenon LM till 1997 • 1990 – 1997 – era of relatively low unemployment rate – between 3-4 % • several causes: postponed economic restructuring, creation of „transformation wage pillow“, drop of labour productivity • sometimes marked as a „Czech economic miracle“ • relatively low share of long-term unemployment • relatively flexible labour market LM since 1997 • monetary crisis in May 1997 → slumpflation → constant UNE growth • economic recession in following 2 years • general decay of economic activity • 1999 – UNE approaches the 10 % level • privatization of banking sector → real economic restructuring • economic recovery in 1999 → soft UNE decrease (but still between 8-9 %) Mobility of the labour force • „socialist tradition“: to remain living on the same place for many years (often for the whole life) • problem of housing – controlled rental + mortgage inaccessibility → inflexible housing market • unwillingness to migrate • migration mainly towards Prague and Brno Migration flows among regions in the CR between 1991 – 2004 (in thousands) Migration balance among counties/regions in CR 1991 – 2004 Education • relatively good quality education system during the socialist era • lower share of tertiary education in comparison to the developed countries, but: • growing share of upper secondary and tertiary education • on the other hand: today – lack of skilled manual workers Educational structure in the CR 1991 – 2002 (in % of employed people) Economic activity of the labour force • one of the highest rate of labour participation – over 70 % during the whole transition period • employment rate – highest level among the V-4 countries • why?: tradition („heritage“ of socialism), low share of shadow economy, low „across border“ job-migration Labour participation rate in V-4 countries (in % of population 15-64) Employment rate in V-4 countries (in % of population 15-64) Labour productivity and wages • price liberalization in 1991 → 56% inflation rate → drop of real wages → creation of „transformation wage pillow“ • pressure on rapid real wages growth in following years • real wages grew faster than the labour productivity in 1994 – 1997 Annual changes of labour productivity in V-4 countries (in %) Labour productivity in V-4 countries (in EUR, constant prices 2000) Annual changes of real wages in V-4 countries (in %) Labour productivity and real wage growth differential (in percent points) CR Unemployment • 1990–(May)1997–UNE rate between 3–4 % • since 1997 – constant UNE growth • 1999 – 2004 – UNE rate between 7–9 % • the UNE rate 3-4% seemed to be artificially low • today: UNE under 6 % Unemployment rate in the CR 1993 – 2005 (%) NARU estimation in V-4 countries Thanx for your attention J