Kepner-Tregoe Methodology (English version) Skorkovský Department of business economy 1 Feveloped by Charles H. Kepner and Benjamin B. Tregoe in the 1960s. 2 The formulation of a problem is far more essential than its solution, which may be merely a matter of mathematical or experimental skill” - Albert Einstein Formulace problému je mnohem důležitější než jeho řešení, které může být pouze otázkou matematické nebo experimentální dovednosti. Related actions – na sebe navazující akce (Formulace problému=identifikace a specifikace) 3 Resource: taken from K&T vidoes Apollo 13 – Houston, Houston, do you read me ? We have a big problem….! The Apollo 13 team is famous for bringing back the astronauts stranded in space by solving difficult and complex problems. The teams solving the problems has used the Kepner-Tregoe (KT) methodology ! 4 Appolo 13 – description (problem and solution) 5 https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-history/space-age/apollo-13-we-have-a-solution https://prezi.com/_ohiqi4xzcxt/tier-v-problems-and-solutions-on-apollo-13/ Appolo 13 – description (problem and solution) 6 What is it K-T methodology ? Kepner Tregoe is used for decision making (finding best possible choice) – nalezení nejlepšího možného rozhodnutí It is a structured methodology for gathering information and prioritizing and evaluating it. (strukturovaný přístup jak shromáždit informace a dát jim správnou prioritu) It is very detailed and complex method applicable in many areas, which is much broader than just idea selection. (detailní a komplexní metoda , kterou je možné aplikovat v různých oblastech- není to pouze výběr plánu resp. nápadu jak řešit problém) It is called also a root cause analysis and decision-making method. (jde o analýzu klíčového problému) It is a step-by-step approach for systematically solving problems, making decisions, and analyzing potential risks. 7 Time Incident Detection Diagnosis Repair Repair Solved incident Restore CRT K-T Ishikawa + Pareto K-T areas 8 Other possible problem analysis Decision analysis 1. Assessment (appraisal) – priorities assigned to current situation 2. Existing Problem analysis – to find root problem (cause) 3. Decision analysis – to select way to react (MaxiMax,Maxi.Min,..) 4. Future problem analysis (risk analysis) Existing problem analysis Assessment (Appraisal) Source : Kepner-Tregoe Appraisal=review= assessment=evaluation = Hodnocení CRT-Ishikawa 9 12 1 2 3 7 4 6 1 2 3 7 4 6 1 2 3 4 6 7 John 8 7 4 3 5 6 Caroline 9 5 7 8 5 6 Mean 8,5 6 5,5 5,5 5 6 1 = Nature (see, forest, mountains, jungle, river,..) 2 = Hotel type 3 = Amenities (pool, golf course, wellness,.. ) 4 = Period (spring, summer, fall, winter). 12 1 2 3 4 1 R1 R2 Prerequisite Requirement P1 P2 Conflict Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative means how to solve problem and what kind of pay-off you will get Access situation (situation appraisal= vyhodnocení situace) •Identify concerns (problems) by listing them (detection) – identifikace problémů a jejich seznam •Separate the level of concern (importance, magnitude and level of influence) – míra důležitosti •Set the priority level to measure seriousness of impacts (influence), urgency and growth potential nastavení úrovní priorit- co řešit dříve a co později •Decide what action to take next (step by step approach) • jak problém postupně řešit •Plan for who is involved, what they will be doing, where they will be involved, when it happened and the extent of involvement (magnitude) •KDO – CO – KDE – KDY - ROZSAH 10 WHO WHAT WHEN WHERE EXTENT 11 Who not When not Where not What not Make decision (A choice between two or more alternatives) •Identify what is being decided (quality, used methods) •Establish and classify objectives (main ones, minor ones,..) - goals •Separate the objectives into must (must to have) and want (nice to have) categories (we have to assign importance factors from 1-10, where 10 is the most important want objective) and assign criterion rating (weights) •Generate the alternatives (we can do it that way or we can take another way as well) •Evaluate the alternatives by scoring the wants against the main objective – see next slides •Review adverse (harmful) consequences of your corrective steps (risk evaluation, risk assessment) •Make the best possible choice what to do • 12 CZ Udělat rozhodnutí (výběr mezi více alternativami za různých okolností) •O čem se má rozhodovat a jak (kvalita, použité metody) •Klasifikace cílů (mdůležité, méně důležité..) •Rozdělení cílů na must (must to have) a want (nice to have) kategorie •(přiřadíme faktory důležitosti 1-10, kde 10 je nejdůležitější faktor (váha) pro všechny want cíle s) •Navrhneme alternativy ( •Vyhodnotíme alternativy s pomocí bodů faktorů důležitosti přiřazených k wants cílů vhledem k cíli hlavnímu •Posoudit nepříznivé (škodlivé) důsledky svých nápravných kroků (hodnocení rizika, posouzení rizik), potvrzení a realizace té nejlepší volby •Udělejte nejlepší možnou volbu • 13 Criteria rating See similar example on the next slide 14 Importance can be understood as a Satisfaction score, meaning desirable but not essential. Criteria rating is related to want criteria and every car property Which car to buy ? 15 Criterion rating Importance score, meaning desirable but not essential. 16 Step 1 Problem: Pick a replacement vehicle for the motor pool fleet The definition of the problem dictates the requirements. As the vehicle is for a motor pool, the requirements will differ from those for a family car, for example. Step 2 Requirements: 1. Vehicle shall be made in U. S. A. 2. Vehicle shall seat at least four adults, but no more than six adults 3. Vehicle shall cost no more than $28,000 4. Vehicle shall be new and the current model year Step 1 and Step 2 17 Min Max Max 28000 USD New car (current model) 18 Step 3 and Step 4 Step 3 Goals: · Maximize passenger comfort · Maximize passenger safety · Maximize fuel-efficiency · Maximize reliability of the car · Minimize investment cost Step 4 Alternatives: There are many alternatives but the requirements eliminate the consideration of a number of them: Requirement 1 eliminates the products not manufactured in the USA Requirement 2 eliminates vans, buses, and sports cars (Ferrari no !!!!) Requirement 3 eliminates high-end luxury cars Requirement 4 eliminates used vehicles 19 Step 5 Criteria: “Maximize comfort” will be based on the combined rear seat leg and shoulder room. (Note: front seat passenger leg and shoulder room was found to be too nearly the same to discriminate among the alternatives.) 5 “Maximize safety” will be based on the total number of stars awarded by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for head-on and side impact. 10 “Maximize fuel efficiency” will be based on the EPA fuel consumption for city driving. 7 “Maximize reliability” will be based on the reliability rating given each vehicle by a consumer product testing company. 9 “Minimize Cost” will be based on the purchase price. 10 Step 5 Weighted criteria vector C(5,10,7,9,10) are values assigned by decision makers !!!! 20 Kepner-Tregoe table (for 4 cars : Arrow, Baton, Carefree and Dash) 21 Last Step Validate Solution: The totals of the weighted scores show that the Dash most nearly meets the wants/goals (or put another way, has the most “benefits”). Dash meets all the requirements and solves the problem !!! Last step – Validation (check) Uncover and handle problems (problem analysis) •State the problem (definition and description of the problem) •Specify the problem by asking : •what is and what is not, who is and who is not, where is and where is not •Develop possible causes of the problem (similar to CRT or Ishikawa) - detection •Test and verify possible causes (testy a verifikace příčin) •Determine the most probable cause (root cause) -(nalezení klíčového problému) •Verify any assumptions (verifikace předpokladů) •Try the best possible solution and monitor what will be a situation after applied correctives step (aplikace zpětné vazby) 22 Description Problem 1 Problem N Description Causes Priority (urgency) Description Causes Priority (urgency) Solution (corrective action) 1 Solution (corrective action) X Solution (corrective action) 1 Solution (corrective action) Y Problem 1´ Problem N´ Situation Situation Oválný popisek: Who What WhereWhenExtent Who What WhereWhenExtent Oválný popisek: Who What WhereWhenExtent Who What WhereWhenExtent 23 Oválný popisek: WHERE and WHERE NOT WHERE and WHERE NOT Oválný popisek: WHERE and WHERE NOT WHERE and WHERE NOT Decomposition, priorities and causes Problem 1 Sub-problem 1 Sub-problem N Priority1 Priority N Problem 1 Problem 2 Sub-problem 1 Sub-problem N Cause 1 Cause N Problem 2 24 Example of problem manifestation (decrease of performance) performance time Planned performance Real performance Unfavourable deviation What do we see, hear, feel, taste, or smell that tells us there is a deviation? Final effect of the = PROBLEM (e.g. server crashed, hard disk with database crashed) Then we have to ask : Who, What, Where, When, and to what Extent –Size (how much, how many)? 25 Server crashed !!!! (home study !!!) •Server crashed (this is a very poor problem definition) •The e-mail system crashed after the 3rd shift support engineer applied hot-fix XYZ to Exchange Server 123 (better definition of the problem) •Comment : WHO is not mentioned here but could be Different staff (3 shift) –see table • History (and best practice) says that the root cause of the problem is probably due to some recent change. WHAT, WHERE, WHEN and EXTENT will be shown on next slides 26 Test the Most Probable Cause (home study !!!) Clarifying problem Analysis (example) We have to ask (where Qi =QUESTION i) : Question IS IS NOT What (identify) Q1 Q2 Where (locate) Q3 Q4 When (timing) Q5 Q6 Extent (magnitude) Q7 Q8 See next slides 27 Problem Analysis - What •What specific object(s) has the deviation? • •What is the specific deviation? • Is Is Not nWhat similar object(s) could have the deviation, but does not? (It did not happen) nWhat other deviations could be reasonably observed, but are not? (It did not happen) Example for Is : 1. What specific object IS related to the defect? Inventory Valuation Objects in database A 2. What specifically is the defect (deviation)? Inventory Adjustment does not work 1-> see setup of the database and see differences 2->see algorithm used for calculation and parameters used. You can see , that in production calculation related algorithm is not functional Example for Is Not : 1. What specific object IS NOT related to the defect? Inventory Valuation Objects in database B 2. What specifically is not the defect (deviation)? Adjustment is working – good setup in database B 1 -> Setup has another parameters ON 2-> Algorithm is used also for production where not error occurs 1. 28 See two MS Dynamics Setup screens (related to the problem specified recently) 29 Back to vampires :Problem Analysis - What •What specific object(s) has the deviation? • • •What is the specific deviation? - bites on the neck • Is Is Not nWhat similar object(s) could have the deviation, but does not? (It did not happen) n n What could the specific deviation? but does not? (It did not happen) – bites=stigma, anemia Example for Is : 1. Nice young girl´s neck and strange look of anemic person 1.Girl with garlic in her hands 2. No bites 3. Healthy 30 Example of Is Not : Example for What IS and What IS NOT Customer X and Customer Y both use product B but only to customer X was sent the wrong product so the object IS Customer X , but IS NOT Customer Y 31 http://digitalgrowth.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/26.jpg Product B Customer Y Customer X Example for When and IS and IS NOT Customer X and Customer Y both use product B but only customer X was sent the wrong product if Salesman Tony was on holiday in this time and Saleswomen Linda was in charge, so the object IS Saleswomen Linda , but IS NOT Salesman Tony 32 http://digitalgrowth.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/26.jpg Linda Tony Problem Analysis - When Is Is Not •When was the deviation observed first (clock and calendar time)? • •When since that time has the deviation been observed? • •When, in the object’s history or life cycle, was the deviation observed first? nWhen else could the deviation have been observed first, but was not? nWhen else since that time could the deviation have been observed, but was not? nWhen else, in the object’s history or life cycle, could the deviation have been observed first, but was not? See example next slide 33 Another example for What IS and What IS NOT as well as Where IS and Where IS NOT IS girl Sarah visited Dracula lower castle without a bunch of garlic, but IS NOT not the one (Emily) having bunch of garlic and visiting Špilberk castle in Brno 34 Sarah (What IS) Emily (What IS NOT) Dracula Castle (Where IS) Špilberk Brno (Where IS NOT) Problem Analysis - Where •Where is the object when the deviation is observed? (geographically) • •Where is the deviation on the object? • nWhere else could the object be when the deviation is observed, but is not? nWhere else could the deviation be located on the object, but is not? Is Is Not Example for Is : 1.Old castle in the mountains (Romania) Where IS : Romanian Carpathian mountains where it is very easy to meet a lot of vampires there Example for Is Not 1. Brno castle Špilberk Where IS NOT possible to meet vampires (only lovers and children and seniors) 35 Problem Analysis - Extent •How many objects have the deviation? • •What is the size of a single deviation? •How many deviations are on each object? • •What is the trend? –Occurrences? –Size? •How many objects could have the deviation, but don’t? •What other size could a deviation be, but isn’t? •How many deviations could there be on each object, but are not? •What could be the trend, but isn’t? •Occurrences? •Size? Is Is Not 36 Problem Analysis Confirm True Cause •What can be done to verify any assumptions made? •How can this cause be observed at work? •How can we demonstrate the cause-and-effect relationship (e.g. Current Reality Tree or Ishikawa Fishbone Diagram)? •When corrective action is taken, how will results be checked? 37 Let’s Look At Some Problems! 38 Systematic Problem Solving and Decision making Overview 39 Planning the Next Steps •Problem Analysis •Do we have a deviation? •Is the cause unknown? •Is it important to know the cause to take effective action? • •If the answer is YES to ALL three listed problems above, than you have a big problem, Huston !!! 40 Problem analysis table template (Home study) 41 Problem description (example) •On a new model of airplane, flight attendants develop rash on arms, hands, face (only those places). It only occurs on flights over water. • •Usually disappears after 24 hours. No problems on old planes over those routes. • •Does not affect all attendants on these flights, but same •number of attendants get it on each flight. Those who get rash have no other ill effects. • •No measurable chemicals, etc., in cabin air. Rash arm -> 42 Results ???? 43 Problem analysis real table Distinction=Difference 44 Problém s rychlosti připojení 45 Stále jsou přijímány nesprávné telefonáty 46 Workplace improvement tools and techniques session 4 Define - ppt ... 47 Example of analysis 48 49 Example of analysis- use of questions 50 51 ITIL, formerly[1] an acronym for Information Technology Infrastructure Library, is a set of detailed practices for IT service management (ITSM) that focuses on aligning IT services with the needs of business. ITIL describes processes, procedures, tasks, and checklists which are not organization-specific nor technology-specific, but can be applied by an organization for establishing integration with the organization's strategy, delivering value, and maintaining a minimum level of competency. It allows the organization to establish a baseline from which it can plan, implement, and measure. It is used to demonstrate compliance and to measure improvement. There is no formal independent third party compliance assessment available for ITIL compliance in an organisation. Certification in ITIL is only available to individuals. 52 53 http://www.ict-123.com/Metody/Kepner-Tregoe Thanks for Your attention 54