European Union Public Policy: from agenda setting to policy formulation and policy decision making, and through to policy implementation Aims and Objectives Despite definitive debates about whether the European Union (EU) can be equated with the characteristics of a fully fledged state, it is certainly beyond dispute that the EU has acquired for itself at least the policy making attributes of a modern state across an increasingly wide range of policy sectors. As a result it has also gained a considerable degree of power in order to set policy agendas, and formulate, implement and enforce policy decisions. After a brief introduction to the EU institutions and the EU public policy process this course will take students on a journey that conceptualises the EU public policy process into four sections – agenda setting, policy formulation, policy decision-making and policy implementation. In examining these four parts of the policy process different models of analysis will be employed at different levels within the EU and at different stages of the policy process. The final section of the course will examine some EU public policy areas, utilising them as case studies within the conceptual frameworks identified in the first part of the course. Structure of the Course The course will be taught through a series of weekly lectures, seminars and workshops. There will be 14 lectures, 5 seminars and 1 workshop Lecture programme: PLEASE NOTE: 75% attendance at lectures (i.e. at least 11) is a requirement to pass this course (see Course Assessment on page 4) 01.10.08. 1. The development of the European Union and the development of E.U. public policy 01.10.08. 2. The basis of, and principles underpinning, E.U. public policy: harmonisation, mutual recognition and convergence? 08.10.08 3. Agenda-setting 1: role and purpose, E.U. political process, and the nature of agendas 08.10.08 4. Agenda-setting 2: fragmentation and the absence of effective policy co-ordination + Workshop (see page 2) 15.10.08 READING AND SEMINAR PREPARATION WEEK (no lecture) 22.10.08 5. Policy formulation 1: the policy communities and policy networks model 22.10.08 6. Policy formulation 2: policy-making uncertainty, expertise and epistemic communities, multiple policy-making ‘venues’ 29.10.08 7. Policy decision-making 1: institutional analysis 29.10.08 8. Policy decision-making 2: decision-making in the European Parliament 05.11.08 9. Policy implementation: implementation as a complex and multifaceted process, inter-organisational behaviour and implementation analysis, characterising implementation in the E.U. + Seminar 1 (see page 3) 12.11.08 10. A case study of the E.U. policy process: Education policy + Seminar 2 (see page 3) 19.11.08 11. Two further case studies of the E.U. policy process: Welfare policy and Environmental policy + Seminar 3 (see page 3) 26.11.08 12. Regions and the E.U. public policy process + Seminar 4 (see page 3) 03.12.08 13. The E.U. policy process: ‘Holidays in Euroland’ (BBC video) + Seminar 5 (see page 4) 10.12.08 14. The ‘Europeanisation’ of public policy Workshop and Seminar programme: PLEASE NOTE: a) 75% attendance at workshop and seminars (i.e. at least 5) is a requirement to pass this course (see Course Assessment on page 4) b) All students will be required to participate in a verbal seminar presentation in English as a requirement to pass the course. The seminar presentation can be made individually or as part of a group presentation. The verbal seminar presentation should be on one of the seminar questions listed below in the Seminar programme. Presentations can be on topics in the Seminar programme that relate to the student’s choice of essay question. Discussion and feedback in the seminar, and in later consultations with the tutor (if requested by students), will assist in the production of the assessment essay. Allocation of seminar presentation topics, on a voluntary basis, will commence from week 2 of the course (08.10.08). Seminars and presentations will commence from week 6 (05.11.08), following the lecture. The 5 seminar sessions will then take place from 05.11.08 until 03.12.08, immediately after the lectures. Students will be expected to have read for each workshop and seminar, and participate. Indicative readings are given below for each seminar and workshop Workshop: This will consist of student participation and discussion groups, and will take place after the lectures scheduled for 08.10.08. 08.10.08 Question: Is harmonisation, mutual recognition or convergence the best principle upon which European Union Public Policy should be based? Provide reasons and evidence for your preference. Readings: Threlfall, M. (2003) ‘European social integration: harmonization, convergence and the single social area’, Journal of European Social Policy, 13, pp.121-140. Borros, S. and Greve, B. (2004) The Open Method of Co-ordination in the European Union, special issue of Journal of European Public Policy, 11:2 (various articles of interest) Sinn, H-W and Ochel, W (2003) ‘Social Union, convergence and migration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41, pp.869-96. Roberts, I. and Springer, B. Social Policy in the European Union: Between Harmonisation and National Autonomy, Boulder, Lynne Reiner, 2001. Seminar Questions: 05.11.08. Seminar 1. Has the development of European Union public policy assisted E.U. integration and added to E.U. integration theory? Readings: Rosamond, B. Theories Of European Integration, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2000. Hix, S. The Political System of the European Union, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2005. 12.11.08. Seminar 2. (a) If fragmentation of the institutions of the E.U. is good for a rich diversity of ideas and proposals in agenda-setting what does it mean for effective public policy co-ordination and implementation? and/or (b) How useful is the policy community and policy networks model in analysing public policy formulation in the European Union? Readings (for 2 (a) and (b)): Richardson, J. European Union. Power and policy-making (Third edition), Oxford, Routledge, 2006. (alternatively, Second edition, 2001). Hix, S. The Political System of the European Union, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2005. McCormick, J. Understanding the European Union (Third edition), Basingstoke, Palgrave , 2005 Nugent, N. The Government and Politics of the European Union, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 19.11.08 Seminar 3. What factors most undermine the negotiating position of the E.U. parliament in the public policy decision-making process? Readings: Richardson, J. European Union. Power and policy-making (Third edition), Oxford, Routledge, 2006. (alternatively, Second edition, 2001). Hix, S. The Political System of the European Union, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2005. McCormick, J. Understanding the European Union (Third edition), Basingstoke, Palgrave , 2005 Nugent, N. The Government and Politics of the European Union, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 26.11.08. Seminar 4. Select an E.U. Public Policy area and, providing evidence, assess whether the best principle for that policy to be based upon would be harmonisation, mutual recognition or convergence. Readings: Hantrais, L. Social Policy in the EU, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2000 (second edition) or 2007 (third edition). Borros, S. and Greve, B. (2004) The Open Method of Co-ordination in the European Union, special issue of Journal of European Public Policy, 11:2 (various articles of interest) Threlfall, M. (2003) ‘European social integration: harmonization, convergence and the single social area’, Journal of European Social Policy, 13, pp.121-140. Jordan, A. and Liefferink, D. (eds.) Environmental Policy in Europe: The Europeanization of National Environmental Policy, London, Routledge, 2004. Kleinman, M. A European Welfare State: European Union Social Policy in context, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2002. Mosher, J. and Trubek, D. (2003) ‘Alternative approaches to governance in the EU: EU Social Policy and the European Employment Strategy’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 4:1, pp.63-88. Guillen, A. and Palier, B. (2004) ‘Does Europe matter? Accession to EU and social policy developments in recent and new member states’, Journal of European Social Policy, 14:3, pp.203-209, and other articles in this special issue on EU Enlargement, Europeanisation and Social Policy. Jepsen, M. and Pascual, A.S. (2005) ‘The European Social Model: an exercise in deconstruction’, Journal of European Social Policy, 15(3), pp.231-245. Neilson, J. (1998) ‘Equal opportunities for women in the European Union: success or failure?’, Journal of European Social Policy, 8, pp.64-79. Sinn, H-W and Ochel, W (2003) ‘Social Union, convergence and migration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41, pp.869-96. Vobruba, G. (2003) ‘The enlargement crisis of the European Union: limits of the dialectics of integration and expansion’, Journal of European Social Policy, 13 (1), pp.35-48, and responses by M. Bach and M. Rhodes. Roberts, I. and Springer, B. Social Policy in the European Union: Between Harmonisation and National Autonomy, Boulder, Lynne Reiner, 2001. 03.12.08. Seminar 5. What are the links between regions and the E.U. in the public policy making process, and what influence do regions have in that process? Readings: Richardson, J. European Union. Power and policy-making (Third edition), Oxford, Routledge, 2006, Ch.13. (alternatively, Second edition, 2001, Ch.12). Farrell, H. and Heritier, A. (2005) ‘A Rationalist-Institutionalist Explanation of Endogenous Regional Integration’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12/2: pp.273-90. Course Assessment: a) Attendance: 75% attendance at lectures (at least 11) and at the seminars/workshop (at least 5) is a requirement to pass this course. b) Seminar Presentation: All students will be required to participate in a verbal seminar presentation in English as a requirement to pass the course. The seminar presentation can be made individually or as part of a group presentation. c) Essay (maximum 2000 words/6 sides of A4 paper): Deadline: Monday 12 January 2009. To be submitted by email or through the Masaryk University Information System Students will be required to submit an essay in answer to one of the questions shown below. The essay must be of a maximum of 2,000 words/6 sides of A4 paper, be typewritten, fully properly referenced, and include a full bibliography. (i) What are the benefits and problems that arise from the processes of agenda-setting and policy implementation at the beginning and end of the European Union public policy cycle? (ii) Can European Union public policy making be described as ‘Europeanised’ or ‘regionalised’? (iii) What similarities and differences can be identified between the role of the E.U. parliament and that of national parliaments in E.U. Member States in respect of public policy formulation and decision-making? (iv) Identify benefits and problems in one public policy area within the E.U. public policy process. Is harmonisation, mutual recognition or convergence the best principle upon which the E.U. should base its policy in your chosen public policy area? Texts Students are referred to a range of journal, book and internet texts. Some of the books and journals are held in the Faculty of Social Studies library. Additional texts will be given within the lectures, and included in the power point presentations for lectures that will be placed on the University Information System prior to each lecture. Books Featherstone, K. and Radaelli, C. (eds.) The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003. (especially the Introduction and the chapter by D. Wincott). Gallie, D. (ed.) Resisting marginalisation: Unemployment experience and social policy in the EU, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004. Geyer, R. Exploring European Social Policy, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2000 Hantrais, L. Social Policy in the EU, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2000 (second edition) or 2007 (third edition). Hix, S. The Political System of the European Union, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2005. Jordan, A. and Liefferink, D. (eds.) Environmental Policy in Europe: The Europeanization of National Environmental Policy, London, Routledge, 2004. Kleinman, M. A European Welfare State: European Union Social Policy in context, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2002. McCormick, J. Understanding the European Union (Third edition), Basingstoke, Palgrave , 2005 Nugent, N. The Government and Politics of the European Union, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Richardson, J. European Union. Power and policy-making (Third edition), Oxford, Routledge, 2006. (alternatively, Second edition, 2001). Roberts, I. and Springer, B. Social Policy in the European Union: Between Harmonisation and National Autonomy, Boulder, Lynne Reiner, 2001. Rosamond, B. Theories Of European Integration, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2000. Salais, R. and Villeneuve, R. (eds.) Europe and the politics of capabilities, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2004 Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U.. (eds.) The Europeanisation of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca NY, Cornell University Press, 2005. Journal articles Borros, S. and Greve, B. (2004) The Open Method of Co-ordination in the European Union, special issue of Journal of European Public Policy, 11:2 (various articles of interest) Farrell, H. and Heritier, A. (2005) ‘A Rationalist-Institutionalist Explanation of Endogenous Regional Integration’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12/2: pp.273-90. Guillen, A. and Palier, B. (2004) ‘Does Europe matter? Accession to EU and social policy developments in recent and new member states’, Journal of European Social Policy, 14:3, pp.203-209, and other articles in this special issue on EU Enlargement, Europeanisation and Social Policy. Jepsen, M. and Pascual, A.S. (2005) ‘The European Social Model: an exercise in deconstruction’, Journal of European Social Policy, 15(3), pp.231-245. Mosher, J. and Trubek, D. (2003) ‘Alternative approaches to governance in the EU: EU Social Policy and the European Employment Strategy’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 4:1, pp.63-88. Neilson, J. (1998) ‘Equal opportunities for women in the European Union: success or failure?’, Journal of European Social Policy, 8, pp.64-79. Sinn, H-W and Ochel, W (2003) ‘Social Union, convergence and migration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41, pp.869-96. Threlfall, M. (2003) ‘European social integration: harmonization, convergence and the single social area’, Journal of European Social Policy, 13, pp.121-140. Van der Mei (2003) ‘Freedom of movement for the unemployed and co-ordination of unemployment benefit schemes’, European Journal of Social Security, 5:3, pp.214-229. Vobruba, G. (2003) ‘The enlargement crisis of the European Union: limits of the dialectics of integration and expansion’, Journal of European Social Policy, 13 (1), pp.35-48, and responses by M. Bach and M. Rhodes. Journals (These Journals, and the articles within them above, are also held in the FSS library) Environmental Politics European Union Politics European Political Science Journal of Common Market Studies Journal of European Social Policy (the ‘European Briefing’ section of this journal is very useful for up-to-date EU developments) Journal of European Public Policy Internet http://www.cec.org.uk http://www.ecsa.org http://europa.eu.int http://ibeurope.eu.int http://www.ieep.org.uk http://www.policylibrary.com Professor John Wilton 01.09.08