Ishikawa and Pareto
Skorkovsky ,KPH MU


TQM and Ishikawa FBD
Reject type (effects);
R1
R2
R3
R4
L19
8
9
2
4
L20
0
1
4
6
L21
7
2
3
5
     Manual for urgent
reject cause elimination
(to establish correct priority of remedy actions)

    Score

Inventory
Suppliers
Machine s
Measurments
Every reject type ->one Ishikawa diagram (electronic version)

Pareto chart : a posibility to split up reject and setup priorities
Lorenz curve
High priorities

Pareto analysis per every type of reject
4
Type of reject
Cause 1
Cause 2
Cause 3
Cause 4
Cause 5
Cause 6
Total
L1
7
2
4
1
8
0
22
L2
2
4
6
8
0
9
29
L3
4
0
0
5
6
7
22
L4
5
7
2
0
1
3
18
L5
0
2
7
3
0
1
13
L6
9
7
5
2
3
6
32
L7
0
7
0
2
3
4
16
L8
1
8
6
2
4
0
21
L9
2
0
5
7
1
4
19
L10
7
2
8
9
7
5
38
C
C5 %
C1 %
C3 %
C2 %
C4 %
C6%
L1
36,36
31,82
18,18
9,09
4,55
0,00
100
Lorenz curve
36,36
68,18
86,36
95,45
100,00
Higher priorities for reject type L1
Type – what happened
Cause – the reason why we have got it
22=7+2+4+……+8+…
36,36=7/22; …..
68,18=36,36+31,82;…..

                            Good day to everybody
•TQM
5
https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTHI7zuTS9cDho6TqJkzde_wufJGkSG3L1zoejEw2QkcXD
_fy37nA