Presentation sign-up sheet Please follow the rules below while signing up. If you disregard the rules, I reserve the right to assign you to another topic. WeekDate Presenter ADD YOU NAME TO THIS COLUMN Presentations 3 03.03 1-2 people but only if there are more than 5 people in the class Andres Koblan, Andrii. 2014. “Political Aspects of CEE-Countries Participation in American Anti-Terrorism Campaign (2001–2011): Czech-Polish Historical and Pedagogical Journal 6 (1); 98-11. Jakobsson, 2009. “An International Actor Under Pressure: The Impact of the War on Terror and the Fifth Enlargement on EU Voting Cohesion at the UN General Assembly 2000–05.” JCMS 47 (3): 531–554. 4 10.03 1 person (2 people but only if there are more than 7 people in the course) Andres Kugiel, Patryk. 2012. “The Development Cooperation Policies of Visegrad Countries —An Unrealised Potential” The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs (4): 101-121. Kopinski, Daniel. 2012. “Visegrad Countries’ Development Aid to Africa: Beyond the Rhetoric.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 13(1): 33-49. 5 17.03 1 person Matej Dangerfield, Martin. 2008. “The Visegrád Group in the Expanded European Union: From Preaccession to Postaccession Cooperation.” East European Politics & Societies 22(3): 630-667 6 24.03 1 person Andrea Copsey, Nathaniel and Karolina Pomorska. 2014. “The Influence of Newer Member States in the European Union: The Case of Poland and the Eastern Partnership.” Europe Asia Studies 66 (3): 421-443. 7 31.03 1 person (2 people if there are more than 6 people in the class) Matej Marton, Peter and Jan Eichler. 2013. “Between willing and reluctant entrapment: CEE countries in NATO’s non-European missions.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 46 (3): 351-362. Hynek, Nik. 2013. “Coping with U.S. and EU’s challenges? Strategic confusion in the Czech foreign and security policy.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 46 (3): 373-385. 11 28.04 1 person Andrea K. Kratochvíl, Petr, Petra Cibulková, and Vít Beneš. 2006. “Foreign policy, rhetorical action and the idea of otherness: The Czech Republic and Russia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39 (4): 497-511.