1
Katedra mezinárodních vztahů a evropských studií
Fakulta sociálních studií
MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA
Joštova 10, 602 00 Brno, Česká republika
MEBn5001 Teorie bezpečnosti a metodologie
sylabus
Určení: prezenční studium, magisterský studijní program,
akademický rok 2019/2020, podzimní semestr
Výuka: čtvrtek 14:00-15:30, místnost 34
Počet kreditů: 8
Ukončení: zkouška
Vyučující: Mgr. Petr Ocelík, Ph.D.
Katedra mezinárodních vztahů a evropských studií
Mgr. Nikita Minin
Katedra mezinárodních vztahů a evropských studií
Cvičící: Mgr. Petr Ocelík, Ph.D.
Mgr. Nikita Minin
Kontaktní osoba: Mgr. Petr Ocelík, Ph.D. (petr.ocelik@gmail.com)
Pro semináře a seminární přípravy:
Mgr. Nikita Minin (nikita.minin@mail.muni.cz)
2
1. Cíle kurzu
V kurzu se studenti seznámí s hlavními teoretickými přístupy k bezpečnosti v disciplíně
mezinárodních vztahů (MV). Cílem kurzu je stručně představit historický vývoj pojmu bezpečnosti v
MV, odlišné způsoby (např. z hlediska pozice aktéra či typu referenčního objektu) konceptualizace
tohoto pojmu a demonstrovat propojení tohoto/těchto konceptu/ů s teoriemi MV. To vše s důrazem
na energetická témata. Úvod kurzu se zaměřuje dvěma dominantním, tradičním, přístupům k MV,
realismu a liberalismu. A dále na nich založených pojetích energetické bezpečnosti, tj. strategickému
a tržnímu přístupu. Následující přednášky jsou zaměřeny na revizionistické přístupy k bezpečnosti.
Postupně je představen sociální konstruktivismus – coby sociální teorie i systémová teorie
mezinárodních vztahů, kodaňská škola a teorie sekuritizace, vybrané koncepty pařížské školy
založené na sociologii Pierra Bourdieua, současné interpretace Marxismu, velšská škola kritických
bezpečnostních studií, a nakonec nový materialismus, který rozvíjí myšlení Bruno Latoura. Studenti
tak získají komplexní vhled do problematiky (energetické) bezpečnosti v teoriích mezinárodních
vztahů, který jim umožní s jednotlivými koncepty a teoriemi nakládat informovaným a tvůrčím
způsobem. Velmi důležité je přitom zapojení studentů v rámci semináře, v němž si formou diskuse
studenti jednotlivé argumenty, koncepty, teorie atd. aktivně osvojují.
Po absolvování kurzu by studenti měli být schopni:
1. porozumět obecným charakteristikám jednotlivých přístupů k bezpečnosti v kontextu
teorií MV;
2. posoudit využitelnost jednotlivých přístupů ve vztahu k aktuálním problémům
proměňujícího se mezinárodního prostředí;
3. použít jednotlivé přístupy ke kritické reflexi a analýze témat v oblasti mezinárodní
bezpečnosti a energetické bezpečnosti.
Důležité upozornění k podvodnému plnění studijních povinností
Výuka na FSS MU předpokládá, že studenti znají studijní předpisy a že se nedopouštějí
podvodného plnění studijních povinností, zejména opisování u zkoušek a plagiátorství, tedy vydávání
cizích myšlenek za vlastní a přebírání myšlenek jiných autorů bez uvedení autorství. Plagiátorství patří
k nejzávažnějším etickým proviněním v akademickém prostředí, popírá poslání univerzity i smysl
studia. Z právního hlediska je plagiátorství krádeží cizího duševního vlastnictví.
Podvodné plnění studijních povinností nemůže být za žádných okolností na FSS tolerováno.
Každý případ podvodného chování bude trestán nejpřísnější sankcí, a to nepodmínečným
vyloučením ze studia. Studentům doporučujeme co nejdůkladněji se seznámit s problémem
plagiátorství a se způsoby, jak se mu vyhnout.
3
2. Organizace kurzu a podmínky jeho absolvování
Kurz proběhne formou přednášek a navazujících seminářů (struktura kurzu detailněji viz
dále). Účast na přednáškách je doporučená, nikoli povinná. Aktivita studentů na seminářích bude
bodově hodnocena. Každý student přednese prezentaci v rámci některého ze seminářů. Poslední
částí hodnocení je závěrečná zkouška (hodnocení detailněji viz dále).
Nedílnou součástí kurzu je závěrečná evaluace formou on-line dotazníku.
2.1 Seminář (58 %)
Plnohodnotné zapojení studentů do práce v semináři vyžaduje, aby si do každého semináře
k danému datu, vypracovali seminární přípravu (position paper) na základě zadané povinné literatury
a případně také doporučené a další literatury. Seminární příprava musí mít 3 části: (1)
reflexi/polemiku; (2) otázky do diskuse (alespoň tři); a (3) seznam literatury. Příprava bude psána
v anglickém jazyce. Příprava zahrne všechny texty zadané v povinné literatuře s výjimkou textů
označených jako „pouze četba“. Rozsah části (1) musí být striktně alespoň 3600 znaků včetně mezer
(jedná se tedy o minimální rozsah přípravy bez (2) otázek a (3) seznamu literatury). Horní hranice
rozsahu části (1) je 4500 znaků včetně mezer.
Přípravy budou vypracovány pro setkání (2) až (9) a (11) až (13); tj. celkem 11 příprav. Za
přípravu je možné získat nejvýše 3 body (celkem tedy 33 bodů). Svoji přípravu student odešle
elektronicky nejpozději 2 dny před konáním semináře (tj. do pondělní půlnoci včetně) do příslušné
„odevzdávárny“. Z textu musí být patrné, kdo je autorem, a na který seminář je příprava
zpracovávána. Formální požadavky viz vzor v organizačních pokynech. Soubor bude pojmenován
v tomto formátu: Prijmeni_cislo (např. Novakova_3).
Hodnocena bude také aktivita v semináři. Student může v jednom semináři získat nejvýše 2
body (celkem tedy 22 bodů). Hodnoceny jsou pouze původní příspěvky do debaty, které rozvíjejí a
posouvají diskuzi (tj. nikoli příspěvky jako: „To jsem chtěl říct také, myslím, že kolega to vystihl“).
2.3 Prezentace (11 %)
Součástí kurzu je prezentace (max. 5 minut), jejímž obsahem bude ukázka aplikace vybrané
teorie či konceptu na konkrétní energeticky rámovaný problém. Prezentace by měla sledovat formu
konferenčního příspěvku. Musí být zpracována v textové formě (detaily viz níže). K tématům
prezentací se studenti přihlásí prostřednictvím online seznamu témat, který jim bude zaslán
emailem nejpozději během prvního týdne semestru.
Prezentaci je nutné odevzdat nejpozději 2 dny před jejím konáním do příslušné
„odevzdávárny“. Rozsah textové formy prezentace by se měl pohybovat cca mezi 5400 až 7200 znaky
(bez seznamu literatury). Text bude splňovat standardní formální požadavky kladené na seminární
práce. Textová forma prezentace bude v anglickém jazyce. Odevzdání textové formy prezentace je
povinné. Soubor bude pojmenován v tomto formátu: Prijmeni_prezentace (např.
4
Novakova_prezentace). Užití Power Pointu či jiných prezentačních nástrojů je možné jen pokud je
z hlediska prezentace klíčové zobrazovat grafický materiál (grafy, mapy, obrázky apod.).
Za řádně odevzdanou a přednesenou prezentaci lze získat nejvýše 10 bodů. Hodnocení bude
reflektovat (1) naplnění daného tématu (4 body), (2) přidanou hodnotu prezentace v porovnání se
zadanou literaturou (4 body), (3) prezentaci příspěvku a naplnění formálních požadavků textové
jeho formy (2 body). Zbývající studenti jsou povinni se s obsahem prezentace v rámci přípravy
seznámit tak, aby byli schopni (v několika bodech) definovat vlastní pozici vůči textu. Povinná
literatura nesmí být použita jako jediný hlavní zdroj příspěvku (jedním z účelů prezentace je dohledat
k tématu alternativní a doplňující informace).
Prezentace proběhnou vždy v úvodu příslušného semináře. Ústní prezentace proběhne
v češtině.
2.4 Závěrečná zkouška (32 %)
Závěrečná zkouška se bude sestávat z 6 otevřených otázek (každá hodnocena 0–5 body)
v rozsahu zadané povinné literatury a odpřednášené látky témat (1) až (9) a (11) až (13). Doba trvání
zkoušky je 60 minut. Nejvýše je tak možné získat 30 bodů.
Pro úspěšné dokončení kurzu je závěrečnou zkoušku nutné absolvovat alespoň na 33 %, tj.
10 bodů.
V případě, že student získá více než 25 bodů, zvýší se jeho celkové hodnocení o jeden stupeň;
a to s výjimkou dvou situací: (1) bodový zisk bez této „prémie“ již odpovídá hodnocení A; (2) bodový
zisk bez této „prémie“ odpovídá hodnocení F.
Termíny zkoušek budou oznámeny v posledním týdnu semestru.
Otázky budou zaměřeny především na probírané koncepty/teorie a (typicky) rovněž jejich
aplikace na modelový případ. Např.: Vysvětlete koncept sekuritizace a uveďte jeho modelovou
aplikaci.
5
2.5 Hodnocení
Výsledné hodnocení studenta bude stanoveno na základě součtů bodových zisků z
následujících úkolů:
(1) aktivita na semináři: 22 bodů
(2) seminární příprava: 33 bodů
(3) prezentace: 10 bodů
(4) závěrečná zkouška: 30 bodů
Celkem je možno dosáhnout 95 bodů
A – Výborně 88–95 bodů
B – Velmi dobře plus 82–87 bodů
C – Velmi dobře 77–81 bodů
D – Dobře plus 71–76 bodů
E – Dobře 60–70 bodů
F – Neprospěl méně než 60 bodů
6
3. Osnova kurzu
(1) Organizace kurzu / Koncepty a teorie: proč jsou důležité (19. IX. 2019)
Úvodní setkání nezahrnuje seminář, a tedy ani seminární přípravu. Závěrečná část bude nicméně
vedena formou diskuse nad literaturou.
Povinná literatura:
• Cuita, F. (2010). Conceptual notes on energy security: total or banal security? Security
dialogue, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 123-144. Accessible from SAGE database. (Pouze četba).
• Hollis, M. & Smith, S. (1990). Explaining and Understanding International Relations.
Clarendon Press, chapters 1, 3, 4. (Pouze četba).
Doporučená literatura:
• Achenbach, J. (2006). The Tempest. The Washington Post. Accessible from:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2006/05/23/AR2006052301305_pf.html
• Chester, L. (2010). Conceptualising energy security and making explicit its polysemic nature.
Energy policy, Vol. 38, No. 4. Accessible from ScienceDirect.com database.
• Marsh, D. & Stoker, G. (2002, Eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science. Hampshire:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 17-41.
• Epstein, M. Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. In: Seale, C. (2012, Ed.). Researching
Society and Culture. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
• Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Meeting of the Aristotelian Society.
London: Bedford Square, 21: London, W.C.1.
• Gerring, J. (1999). What Makes a Concept Good? Polity, Vol. 31, No. 3. Accessible from Jstor
database.
• Van Evera, S. (1995). Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca: Cornell
University Press, pp. 7-15.
• Wight, C. (2006). Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology.
Cambridge University Press.
7
(2) Realismus: strategický přístup a rovnováha moci (26. IX. 2019)
Povinná literatura:
• Dunne, T. & Schmidt, B. Realism. In: Baylis, J. & Smith, S. (2001, Eds.). The Globalization of
World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 141-161. (Pouze četba).
• Klare, M. T. There Will Be Blood: Political Violence, Regional Warfare, and the Risk of GreatPower
Conflict over Contested Energy Sources. In: Luft, G. & Korin, A. (2009, Eds.). Energy
Security Challenges for the 21st Century: A Reference Handbook. Praeger.
• Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Boston: McGraw-Hill, pp. 116-123.
Doporučená literatura:
• Baghat, G. Summer (2003). The new geopolitics of oil: The United States, Saudi Arabia, and
Russia. Foreign Policy Research Institute, Elsevier Science Limited.
• Baldwin, D. A. (1997). The concept of security. Review of International Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1,
pp. 5-26. Accessible from:
http://www.rect.muni.cz/summerschool/International_Security/Module%201/baldwin.pdf
• Česnakas, G. (2010). Energy resources in foreign policy: a theoretical approach. Baltic Journal
of Law & Politics, Vol. 3, No. 1.
• James, L. & Morgan, P. (1999). Security Studies Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Klare, M. T. (2008). Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet: The New Geopolitics of Energy.
Transcription of conference. Accessible from:
http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/studio/multimedia/20080514/0041.html/_res/id=sa_File1/
Rising_Powers_Shrinking_Planet.pdf
• Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Pascual, C. & Zambetakis, E. The Geopolitics of Energy. From Security to Survival. In: Pascual,
C. & Elkind, J. (2009, Eds.). Energy Security. Economics, Politics, Strategies, and Implications.
Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
• Walt, S. (1991). The Renaissance of Security Studies. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 35,
No. 2, pp. 211-239. Accessible from Jstor database.
• Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
• Wolfers, A. (1952). “National Security” as an Ambiguous Symbol. Political Science Quarterly,
Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 481-502. Accessible from Jstor database.
Populární kultura (realismus):
• Kroeker, A. (2003). Star Trek Enterprise: The Expanse (S02E26).
• Kroeker, A. (2003). Star Trek Enterprise: The Xindi (S03E01).
• Landau, L. (1996). Star Trek Voyager: Alliances (S02E14).
• Lobl, V. (1998). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: In the Pale Moonlight (S06E19).
• Spielberg, S. (2015). Bridge of Spies.
8
(3) Liberalismus: tržní přístup a interdependence (3. X. 2019)
Povinná literatura:
• Dunne, T. Liberalism. In: Baylis, J. & Smith, S. (2001, Eds.). The Globalization of World Politics.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 162-181. (Pouze četba).
• Fettweis, Ch. J. No Blood for Oil: Why Resource Wars are Obsolete. In: Luft, G. & Korin, A.
(2009, Eds.). Energy Security Challenges for the 21st Century: A Reference Handbook.
Praeger.
• Keohane, R. & Nye, J. (2001). Power and interdependence (3rd ed.). New York: Longman,
chapters 1 a 2. Accessible in FSS library.
Doporučená literatura:
• Adelman, M. A. (1973). The World Petroleum Market. John Hopkins University Press.
• Belyi, A. (2009). Reciprocity as a factor of the energy investment regimes in the EU-Russia
energy relations. Journal of World Energy Law & Business, Vol. 2, No. 2. Accessible from:
https://www.kent.ac.uk/politics/carc/research/eeag/papers/117JWELB_A_Belyi.pdf
• Binhack, P. & Tichy, L. (2012). Asymmetric interdependence in the Czech-Russian Relations.
Energy Policy, Vol. 12, No. 6. Accessible from ScienceDirect.com database.
• Carter, E. & Nivola, P. Making Sense of „Energy Independence“. In: Elkind, J. & Pascual, C.
(2009, Eds.). Energy security: Economics, Politics, Strategies, and Implications. Brookings
Institution Press.
• Nordhaus, W. (2009). The Economics of an Integrated World Oil Market. Keynote Address at
International Energy Workshop.
• Nye, J. (2006). The Wrong Way to Think About Oil. Project Syndicate.
• Prange-Gstöhl, H. (2009). Enlarging the EU´s internal energy market: Why would third
countries accept EU rule export? Energy policy, Vol. 37, No. 12.
• Reuveny, R., & Kang, H. (1998). Bilateral trade and political conflict/cooperation: Do goods
matter? Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 35, No. 5.
• Yergin, D. (2006). Ensuring Energy Security. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85, No. 2. Accessible from:
http://www.un.org/ga/61/second/daniel_yergin_energysecurity.pdf
Populární kultura (liberalismus):
• Lucas, G. (1999). Star Wars. Episode I: The Phantom Menace.
• Lucas, G. (2002). Star Wars. Episode II Attack of the Clones.
• Lucas, G. (2005). Star Wars. Episode III Revenge of the Sith.
9
(4) Revizionistické přístupy k bezpečnosti v mezinárodních vztazích (10. X. 2019)
Povinná literatura:
• Baylis, J. International and global security in the post-cold war era. In: Baylis, J. & Smith, S.
(2001, Eds.). The Globalization of World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 253-
276. (Pouze četba).
• Baldwin, D. A. (1995). Security studies and the end of the cold war. World Politics, Vol. 48,
No. 1, pp. 117-141. Accessible from Jstor database.
• Jackson, R. (2012). How I was radicalized, or, the effect of opening your eyes. Accessible from:
https://richardjacksonterrorismblog.wordpress.com/2012/10/29/how-i-was-radicalized-or-
the-effects-of-opening-your-eyes
Doporučená literatura:
• Buzan, B. & Hansen, L. (2009). The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
• Daniel, J. & Turcsányi, R. (2015). The Challenges of Central European Security: Critical Insights.
Brno: Masarykova univerzita. Accessible from: http://www.globalpolitics.cz/wp-
content/uploads/2015/04/Challenges_of_central_european_security.pdf
• Huysmans, J. (1998). Security! What do you mean? From concept to thick signifier. European
Journal of International Relations, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 226-255. Accessible from SAGE database.
• Kolodziej, E. A. (1992). What is security and security studies? Lessons from the cold war.
Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1-31. Accessible from Taylor and Francis
database.
• Krause, K. & Williams, M. (1996). Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and
Methods. Mershon International Studies Review, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 229-254. Accessible from
Jstor database.
• Peoples, C. & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2010). Critical security studies. An introduction. London
and New York: Routledge.
• Shaw, M. (1993). There is no such thing as society: Beyond individualism and statism in
international security studies. Review of International Studies, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 159-175.
Accessible from Jstor database.
10
(5) Současné interpretace Marxismu (17. X. 2019)
Povinná literatura:
• Marsh, D. & Stoker, G. (2002, Eds.). Theory and Methods in Political Science. Hampshire:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 153-171.
• Gilpin, R. (1986). The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton
University Press, pp. 34-41, 50-64.
Doporučená literatura:
• Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations
Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2. Accessible from SAGE
database.
• Gill, S., Law, D. (1988). The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems, and Policies.
Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Gilpin, R. (1986). The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton
University Press, pp. 65-117.
• Hinnebusch, R. (2003). The International Politics of the Middle East. Manchester and New
York: Manchester University Press.
• Wallerstein, I. (1984). The Politics of the World-Economy: The States, the Movements and the
Civilizations. Cambridge University Press.
Populární kultura (Marxismus, velšská škola a kritické teorie)
• Bertolucci, B. (1970). Il Conformista.
• Blomkamp, N. (2009). District 9.
• Blomkamp, N. (2013). Elysium.
• Burger, N. (2014). Divergent.
• Cuarón, A. (2018). Roma.
• Joon-ho, B. (2019). Parasite.
• Lang, F. (1927). Metropolis.
• Niccol. A. (2011). In Time.
• Windell, T. (2000). Star Trek Voyager: Critical Care (S07E08).
11
(6) Velšská škola: strukturální omezení a emancipace (24. X. 2019)
Povinná literatura:
• Booth, K. (1991). Security and Emancipation. Review of International Studies, Vol. 17, No. 4,
pp. 313-326. Accessible from Jstor database. (Pouze četba).
• Oels, A. From Securitization of Climate Change to Climatization of the Security Field:
Comparing Three Theoretical Perspectives. In: Scheffran, J., Brzoska, M., Brauch H. G., Link, P.
M., and Schilling, J. (2012, Eds.). Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict. Vol. 8
of the series Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, pp. 185-205.
• Olowaniyi, O. O. (2010). Oil and Youth Militancy in Nigeria’s Niger Delta Region. Journal of
Asian and African Studies, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 309-325. Accessible from SAGE database.
Doporučená literatura:
• Booth, K. (2007). Theory of World Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations
Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2. Accessible from SAGE
database.
• Cox, R. W. (2010). Robert Cox on World Orders, Historical Change, and the Purpose of Theory
in International Relations. Theory Talky #37: Robert Cox. Accessible from:
http://www.theory-talks.org/2010/03/theory-talk-37.html
• Cuita, F. & Klinke, I. (2010). Lost in conceptualization: reading the “new Cold War“ with
critical geopolitics. Political Geography, Vol. 29, No. 6. Accessible from ScienceDirect.com
database.
• Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 6,
No. 3. Accessible from Jstor database.
• Human Security Now. Final Report. (2003). Commission on Human Security. New York.
Accessible from:
http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/91BAEEDBA50C6907C1256D19006A9
353-chs-security-may03.pdf
• King, G. & Murray, Ch. J. (2002). Rethinking Human Security. Political Science Quarterly, Vol.
116, pp. 585–610. Accessible from Wiley database.
• O´Tuathail, G. (1996). Critical geopolitics: the politics of writing global space (Barrows
lectures). University of Minnesota press.
Populární kultura (Marxismus, velšská škola a kritické teorie)
• Bertolucci, B. (1970). Il Conformista.
• Blomkamp, N. (2009). District 9.
• Blomkamp, N. (2013). Elysium.
• Burger, N. (2014). Divergent.
• Cuarón, A. (2018). Roma.
• Joon-ho, B. (2019). Parasite.
• Lang, F. (1927). Metropolis.
• Niccol. A. (2011). In Time.
• Windell, T. (2000). Star Trek Voyager: Critical Care (S07E08).
12
(7) Sociální konstruktivismus (31. X. 2019)
Povinná literatura:
• Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin Group, chapter 1.
(Pouze četba).
• Wendt, A. Anarchy is what States make of it. The Social Construction of Power Politics.
International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 391-425. Accessible from Jstor database.
• Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of international Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, pp. 246-259.
Doporučená literatura:
• Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin
Books.
• Huysmans, J. (2002). Defining Social Constructivism in Security Studies: The Normative
Dilemma of Writing Security. Alternatives, Vol. 27. pp. 41-62.
• Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). The Culture of National Security. New York: Columbia University
Press.
• Ocelík, P. & Osička, J. (2014). The framing of unconventional natural gas resources in the
foreign energy policy discourse of the Russian Federation. Energy Policy, Vol. 72. Accessible
from ScienceDirect.com database.
• Ocelík, P., Osička, J., Zapletalová, V., Černoch, F., Dančák, B. (2017). Local opposition and
acceptance of a deep geological repository of radioactive waste in the Czech Republic: A
frame analysis. Energy Policy, Vol. 105, pp. 458-466.
• Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin Group.
• Weldes, Y. (1996). Constructing National Interest. European Journal of International
Relations, Vol. 2, No. 3. Accessible from SAGE database.
• Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of international Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
• Ziegler, Ch. E. (2013). Energy Pipeline Networks and Trust: The European Union and Russia in
Comparative Perspective. International Relations, Vol. 27. Accessible from SAGE.
Populární kultura (sociální konstruktivismus)
• Kolbe, W. (1991). Star Trek Next Generation: Darmok (S05E02).
• Lorraine, L. (2012). The Other Son.
• Villeneuve, D. (2016). Arrival.
13
(8) Kodaňská škola: bezpečnostní komplex a teorie sekuritizace (7. XI. 2019)
Povinná literatura:
• Buzan, B., Waever, O., and Wilde, J. (1997). Security: New Framework for Analysis. Lynne
Rienner Publishers, Inc., chapter 2. Accessible in FSS library.
• Szulecki, K. & Kusnir, J. (2017). Energy security and energy transition – securitisation in the
electricity sector. Draft manuscript written for the edited volume „Energy Security in Europe:
Divergent Perceptions and Policy Challenges“. Accessible from:
https://www.researchgate.net/project/When-energy-becomes-security-The-Copenhagen-
School-meets-energy-studies/update/595cd50d1042bf83f34c7bac
Doporučená literatura:
• Buzan, B. & Waever, O. (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security.
Cambridge University Press.
• Buzan, B., Waever, O., and Wilde, J. (1997). Security: New Framework for Analysis. Lynne
Rienner Publishers, Inc.
• Christou, O. (2013). Energy securitization and desecuritization in the New Middle East.
Security Dialogue, Vol. 44, No. 5-6, pp. 507-522. Accessible from SAGE database.
• Kirchner, E. & Berk, C. (2010). European Energy Security Co-operation: Between Amity and
Enmity. Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 48, Issue 4. Accessible from Wiley database.
• McDonald, M. (2008). Securitization and the Construction of Security. European Journal of
International Relations, Vol. 14, No. 4. Accessible from SAGE database.
• Palonkorpi, M. (2008). Matter over Mind? Securitizing Regional Energy Interdependencies.
Aleksanteri Institute, University of Helsinki. Accessible from:
http://www.ii.umich.edu/UMICH/ceseuc/Home/Academics/Research%20Projects/Energy%2
0Security%20in%20Europe%20and%20Eurasia/Matter%20Over%20Mind%20-
%20Palonkorpi.pdf
Populární kultura (kodaňská a pařížská škola)
• Burton, L. (2005). Star Trek Enterprise: Demons (S04E20).
• Livingston, D. (1996). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: Homefront (S04E11).
• Moore, R.D. (1996). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: Paradise Lost (S04E12).
• Moore, R.D. (1996). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: For the Cause (S04E22).
• Rush, M.V. (2005). Star Trek Enterprise: Terra Prime (S04E21).
• Shyamalan, M.N. (2004). The Village.
• Spielberg, S. (2004). Terminal.
14
(9) Kodaňská škola: revize (14. XI. 2019)
Povinná literatura:
• Ciută, F. (2009). Security and the problem of context: a hermeneutical critique of
securitisation theory. Review of International Studies, Vol. 35, No. 02, pp. 301-326. Accessible
from Cambridge Journals database.
• Stritzel, H. (2007). Towards a Theory of Securitization: Copenhagen and Beyond. European
Journal of International Relations, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 357-383. Accessible from SAGE
database.
Doporučená literatura:
• Aradau, C. (2004). Security and the democratic scene: desecuritization and emancipation.
Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 388-413. Accessible
from SAGE database.
• Balzacq, T. (2005). The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context.
European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 171–201. Dostupné v databázi
SAGE.
• Lupták, Ľ. (2011). Bezpečnostný diskurz v SR: lokalizácia ne(o)liberálneho vládnutia
v postsocialistickom barbaricu. Nepublikovaná disertační práce. Plzeň: Západočeská
univerzita v Plzni. Dostupné z: https://theses.cz/id/f6bkh0/
• Mérand, F. (2006). Social Representations in the European Security and Defence Policy.
Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 131–152. Accessible from SAGE database.
• Salter, M. (2008). When the exception becomes the rule: borders, sovereignty, and
citizenship. Citizenship Studies, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 365-380. Accessible from Taylor & Francis
database.
Populární kultura (kodaňská a pařížská škola)
• Burton, L. (2005). Star Trek Enterprise: Demons (S04E20).
• Livingston, D. (1996). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: Homefront (S04E11).
• Moore, R.D. (1996). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: For the Cause (S04E22).
• Moore, R.D. (1996). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: Paradise Lost (S04E12).
• Rush, M.V. (2005). Star Trek Enterprise: Terra Prime (S04E21).
• Shyamalan, M.N. (2004). The Village.
• Spielberg, S. (2004). Terminal.
15
(10) Čtecí týden (21. XI. 2019)
(11) Pařížská škola: pole, habitus a praktiky (28. XI. 2019)
Povinná literatura:
• Balzacq, T., Tugba, B., Bigo, D., Guitter, E.-P., and Olsson, Ch. (2010). Security Practices.
International Studies Encyclopaedia. Oxford: Blackwell. (Pouze četba).
• Daniel, J. & Rychnovská, D. (2015). Mezinárodní politická sociologie: výzkum praxe
bezpečnosti. Mezinárodní vztahy, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 26-45. Accessible from:
https://mv.iir.cz/article/view/1305 (Pouze četba)
• Berling, T. V. (2012). Bourdieu, International Relations, and European Security. Theory and
Society, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 451-478. Accessible from Springer database.
Doporučená literatura:
• Adler-Nissen, R. (2013). Bourdieu in International Relations. Rethinking key concepts in IR.
London and New York: Routledge.
• Bigo, D. (2011). Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations: Power of Practices of Power.
International Political Sociology, Vol. 5, pp. 225-258. Accessible from Wiley database.
• Bigo, D. Security: Analysing transnational professionals of (in)security in Europe. In: AdlerNissen,
R. (2013, Ed.): Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR.
London and New York: Routledge, pp. 114–130.
• Brauch, H. G. Securitizing Global Environmental Change. In: Brauch, H. G., Spring, O., Úrsula,
G., Grin, J., Czeslaw, M., Mbote, K. P., Behera, N. Ch., Chourou, B., Krummenacher, H. (2009,
Eds.): Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, human, energy, food, health and
water security concepts, Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace 4.
Berlin: Springer, pp. 65–104.
• Peoples, C. & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2010). Critical security studies. An introduction. London
and New York: Routledge, pp. 62-74.
• Salter, M. B. The practice turn: Introduction. In: Salter, M. B., Mutlu, C. E. (2013, Eds.):
Research Methods in Critical Security Studies: An Introduction. London and New York:
Routledge, pp. 85–91.
• Salter, M. B. The practice turn: Introduction. In: Salter, M. B., Mutlu, C. E. (2013, Eds.):
Research Methods in Critical Security Studies: An Introduction. London and New York:
Routledge, pp. 85–91.
Populární kultura (kodaňská a pařížská škola)
• Burton, L. (2005). Star Trek Enterprise: Demons (S04E20).
• Livingston, D. (1996). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: Homefront (S04E11).
• Moore, R.D. (1996). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: For the Cause (S04E22).
• Moore, R.D. (1996). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: Paradise Lost (S04E12).
• Rush, M.V. (2005). Star Trek Enterprise: Terra Prime (S04E21).
• Shyamalan, M.N. (2004). The Village.
• Spielberg, S. (2004). Terminal.
16
(12) Pařížská škola: expertní vědění a bezpečnostní komunity (5. XII. 2019)
Povinná literatura:
• Berling, T. V. (2011). Science and securitization: Objectivation, the authority of the speaker
and mobilization of scientific facts. Security Dialogue, Vo. 42, No. 4-5, pp. 385-397. Accessible
from SAGE database.
• Machacek, E. (2017). Constructing criticality by classification: Expert assessments of mineral
raw materials. Geoforum, Vol. 84, pp. 368-377. Accessible from Science Direct database.
Doporučená literatura:
• Adler, E. (2004). The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, SelfRestraint,
and NATO´s Post-Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International
Relations, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 195-230.
• Hopf, T. (2010). The logic of habit in International Relations. European Journal of
International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 539-561.
• Oels, A. From Securitization of Climate Change to Climatization of the Security Field:
Comparing Three Theoretical Perspectives. In: Scheffran, J., Brzoska, M., Brauch H. G., Link, P.
M., and Schilling, J. (Eds., 2012). Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict. Vol. 8
of the series Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, pp. 185-205.
• Pouliot, V. (2008). The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities.
International Organization, Vol. 62, No. 2, pp 257-288. Accessible from Jstor database.
• Rychnovská, D., Pasgaard, M., and Berling, T. V. (2017). Science and security expertise:
Authority, knowledge, subjectivity. Geoforum, Vol. 84. Accessible from Science Direct
database.
Populární kultura (kodaňská a pařížská škola)
• Burton, L. (2005). Star Trek Enterprise: Demons (S04E20).
• Livingston, D. (1996). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: Homefront (S04E11).
• Moore, R.D. (1996). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: For the Cause (S04E22).
• Moore, R.D. (1996). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: Paradise Lost (S04E12).
• Rush, M.V. (2005). Star Trek Enterprise: Terra Prime (S04E21).
• Shyamalan, M.N. (2004). The Village.
• Spielberg, S. (2004). Terminal.
17
(13) Nový materialismus: asambláž, teorie sítí-aktérů a překlad (12. XII. 2019)
Povinná literatura:
• Acuto, M. & Curtis, S. Assemblage Thinking and International Relations. In: Acuto, M. &
Curtis, S. (2014, Eds.): Reassembling International Theory: Assemblage Thinking and
International Relations. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 1–15. (Pouze četba).
• Konopásek, Z., Soneryd, L., and Svačina, K. (2018). Lost in Translation: Czech Dialogues by
Swedish Design. Science and Technology Studies (v tisku).
• Schouten, P. (2013). The Materiality of State Failure: Social Contract Theory, Infrastructure
and Governmental Power in Congo. Millenium: Journal of International Studies. Vol. 41, No.
3, pp. 553-574. Accessible from SAGE database.
Doporučená literatura:
• Acuto, M. & Curtis, S. (2014, Eds.): Reassembling International Theory: Assemblage Thinking
and International Relations. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Aradau, Claudia (2010): Security that matters: critical infrastructure and objects of
protection. Security Dialogue, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 491–514.
• Barry, A. (2013). The Translation Zone: Between Actor/Network Theory and International
Relations. Millenium: Journal of International Studies. Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 413-429. Accessible
from SAGE database.
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
• Müller, M. (2015). Assemblages and Actor-networks: Rethinking Socio-material Power,
Politics and Space. Geography Compass, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 27-41. Accessible from Wiley
database.
• Sovacool, B. K. (2006). Reactors, weapons, x-rays, and solar panels: Using SCOT, technological
frame, epistemic culture, and actor network theory to investigate technology. Journal of
Technology Studies, Vol. 32, pp. 4-14.
Populární kultura (nový materialismus)
• Lederman, R. (1992). Star Trek Next Generation: I, Borg (S05E23).
• PBS. (2011). Salmon: Running the Gauntlet (Nature Episode S29E13).
• The Wachowskis. (1999). The Matrix.
18
Povinná literatura
• Acuto, M. & Curtis, S. Assemblage Thinking and International Relations. In: Acuto, M. &
Curtis, S. (2014, Eds.): Reassembling International Theory: Assemblage Thinking and
International Relations. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 1–15. (Pouze četba). Balzacq, T.,
Tugba, B., Bigo, D., Guitter, E.-P., and Olsson, Ch. (2010). Security Practices. International
Studies Encyclopaedia. Oxford: Blackwell. (Pouze četba).
• Baylis, J. International and global security in the post-cold war era. In: Baylis, J. & Smith, S.
(2001, Eds.). The Globalization of World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 253-
276. (Pouze četba).
• Booth, K. (1991). Security and Emancipation. Review of International Studies, Vol. 17, No. 4,
pp. 313-326. Accessible from Jstor database. (Pouze četba).
• Cuita, F. (2010). Conceptual notes on energy security: total or banal security? Security
dialogue, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 123-144. Accessible from SAGE database. (Pouze četba).
• Daniel, J. & Rychnovská, D. (2015). Mezinárodní politická sociologie: výzkum praxe
bezpečnosti. Mezinárodní vztahy, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 26-45. Accessible from:
https://mv.iir.cz/article/view/1305 (Pouze četba)
• Dunne, T. & Schmidt, B. Realism. In: Baylis, J. & Smith, S. (2001, Eds.). The Globalization of
World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 141-161. (Pouze četba).
• Dunne, T. Liberalism. In: Baylis, J. & Smith, S. (2001, Eds.). The Globalization of World Politics.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 162-181. (Pouze četba).
• Hollis, M. & Smith, S. (1990). Explaining and Understanding International Relations.
Clarendon Press, chapters 1, 3, 4. (Pouze četba).
• Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin Group, chapter 1.
(Pouze četba).
• Baldwin, D. A. (1995). Security studies and the end of the cold war. World Politics, Vol. 48,
No. 1, pp. 117-141. Accessible from Jstor database.
• Berling, T. V. (2011). Science and securitization: Objectivation, the authority of the speaker
and mobilization of scientific facts. Security Dialogue, Vo. 42, No. 4-5, pp. 385-397. Accessible
from SAGE database.
• Berling, T. V. (2012). Bourdieu, International Relations, and European Security. Theory and
Society, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 451-478. Accessible from Springer database.
• Buzan, B., Waever, O., and Wilde, J. (1997). Security: New Framework for Analysis. Lynne
Rienner Publishers, Inc., chapter 2. Accessible in FSS library.
• Ciută, F. (2009). Security and the problem of context: a hermeneutical critique of
securitisation theory. Review of International Studies, Vol. 35, No. 02, pp. 301-326. Accessible
from Cambridge Journals database.
• Fettweis, Ch. J. No Blood for Oil: Why Resource Wars are Obsolete. In: Luft, G. & Korin, A.
(2009, Eds.). Energy Security Challenges for the 21st Century: A Reference Handbook.
Praeger.
• Gilpin, R. (1987). The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton
University Press, pp. 34-41, 50-64.
19
• Jackson, R. (2012). How I was radicalized, or, the effect of opening your eyes. Accessible from:
https://richardjacksonterrorismblog.wordpress.com/2012/10/29/how-i-was-radicalized-or-
the-effects-of-opening-your-eyes
• Keohane, R. & Nye, J. (2001). Power and interdependence (3rd ed.). New York: Longman,
chapters 1 a 2. Accessible in FSS library.
• Klare, M. T. There Will Be Blood: Political Violence, Regional Warfare, and the Risk of GreatPower
Conflict over Contested Energy Sources. In: Luft, G. & Korin, A. (2009, Eds.). Energy
Security Challenges for the 21st Century: A Reference Handbook. Praeger.
• Konopásek, Z., Soneryd, L., and Svačina, K. (2018). Lost in Translation: Czech Dialogues by
Swedish Design. Science and Technology Studies (in press).
• Machacek, E. (2017). Constructing criticality by classification: Expert assessments of mineral
raw materials. Geoforum, Vol. 84, pp. 368-377. Accessible from Science Direct database.
• Marsh, D. & Stoker, G. (2002, Eds.). Theory and Methods in Political Science. Hampshire:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 153-171.
• Oels, A. From Securitization of Climate Change to Climatization of the Security Field:
Comparing Three Theoretical Perspectives. In: Scheffran, J., Brzoska, M., Brauch H. G., Link, P.
M., and Schilling, J. (2012, Eds.). Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict. Vol. 8
of the series Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, pp. 185-205.
• Olowaniyi, O. O. (2010). Oil and Youth Militancy in Nigeria’s Niger Delta Region. Journal of
Asian and African Studies, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 309-325. Accessible from SAGE database.
• Schouten, P. (2013). The Materiality of State Failure: Social Contract Theory, Infrastructure
and Governmental Power in Congo. Millenium: Journal of International Studies. Vol. 41, No.
3, pp. 553-574. Accessible from SAGE database.
• Stritzel, H. (2007). Towards a Theory of Securitization: Copenhagen and Beyond. European
Journal of International Relations, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 357-383. Accessible from SAGE
database.
• Szulecki, K. & Kusnir, J. (2017). Energy security and energy transition – securitisation in the
electricity sector. Draft manuscript written for the edited volume „Energy Security in Europe:
Divergent Perceptions and Policy Challenges“. Accessible from:
https://www.researchgate.net/project/When-energy-becomes-security-The-Copenhagen-
School-meets-energy-studies/update/595cd50d1042bf83f34c7bac
• Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Boston: McGraw-Hill, pp. 116-123.
• Wendt, A. Anarchy is what States make of it. The Social Construction of Power Politics.
International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 391-425. Accessible from Jstor database.
• Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of international Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, pp. 246-259.
Doporučená literatura
• Achenbach, J. (2006). The Tempest. The Washington Post. Accessible from:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2006/05/23/AR2006052301305_pf.html
• Acuto, M. & Curtis, S. (2014, Eds.): Reassembling International Theory: Assemblage Thinking
and International Relations. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Adelman, M. A. (1973). The World Petroleum Market. John Hopkins University Press.
20
• Adler, E. (2004). The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, SelfRestraint,
and NATO´s Post-Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International
Relations, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 195-230.
• Adler-Nissen, R. (2013). Bourdieu in International Relations. Rethinking key concepts in IR.
London and New York: Routledge.
• Aradau, C. (2004). Security and the democratic scene: desecuritization and emancipation.
Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 388-413. Accessible
from SAGE database.
• Aradau, Claudia (2010): Security that matters: critical infrastructure and objects of
protection. Security Dialogue, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 491–514.
• Baghat, G. Summer (2003). The new geopolitics of oil: The United States, Saudi Arabia, and
Russia. Foreign Policy Research Institute, Elsevier Science Limited.
• Baldwin, D. A. (1997). The concept of security. Review of International Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1,
pp. 5-26. Accessible from:
http://www.rect.muni.cz/summerschool/International_Security/Module%201/baldwin.pdf
• Balzacq, T. (2005). The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context.
European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 171–201. Dostupné v databázi
SAGE.
• Barry, A. (2013). The Translation Zone: Between Actor/Network Theory and International
Relations. Millenium: Journal of International Studies. Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 413-429. Accessible
from SAGE database.
• Belyi, A. (2009). Reciprocity as a factor of the energy investment regimes in the EU-Russia
energy relations. Journal of World Energy Law & Business, Vol. 2, No. 2. Accessible from:
https://www.kent.ac.uk/politics/carc/research/eeag/papers/117JWELB_A_Belyi.pdf
• Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin
Books.
• Bigo, D. (2011). Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations: Power of Practices of Power.
International Political Sociology, Vol. 5, pp. 225-258. Accessible from Wiley database.
• Bigo, D. Security: Analysing transnational professionals of (in)security in Europe. In: AdlerNissen,
R. (2013, Ed.): Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking key concepts in IR.
London and New York: Routledge, pp. 114–130.
• Binhack, P. & Tichy, L. (2012). Asymmetric interdependence in the Czech-Russian Relations.
Energy Policy, Vol. 12, No. 6. Accessible from ScienceDirect.com database.
• Booth, K. (2007). Theory of World Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Brauch, H. G. Securitizing Global Environmental Change. In: Brauch, H. G., Spring, O., Úrsula,
G., Grin, J., Czeslaw, M., Mbote, K. P., Behera, N. Ch., Chourou, B., Krummenacher, H. (2009,
Eds.): Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, human, energy, food, health and
water security concepts, Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace 4.
Berlin: Springer, pp. 65–104.
• Buzan, B. & Hansen, L. (2009). The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
• Buzan, B. & Waever, O. (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security.
Cambridge University Press.
• Buzan, B., Waever, O., and Wilde, J. (1997). Security: New Framework for Analysis. Lynne
Rienner Publishers, Inc.
21
• Carter, E. & Nivola, P. Making Sense of „Energy Independence“. In: Elkind, J. & Pascual, C.
(2009, Eds.). Energy security: Economics, Politics, Strategies, and Implications. Brookings
Institution Press.
• Česnakas, G. (2010). Energy resources in foreign policy: a theoretical approach. Baltic Journal
of Law & Politics, Vol. 3, No. 1.
• Chester, L. (2010). Conceptualising energy security and making explicit its polysemic nature.
Energy policy, Vol. 38, No. 4. Accessible from ScienceDirect.com database.
• Christou, O. (2013). Energy securitization and desecuritization in the New Middle East.
Security Dialogue, Vol. 44, No. 5-6, pp. 507-522. Accessible from SAGE database.
• Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations
Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2. Accessible from SAGE
database.
• Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations
Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2. Accessible from SAGE
database.
• Cox, R. W. (2010). Robert Cox on World Orders, Historical Change, and the Purpose of Theory
in International Relations. Theory Talky #37: Robert Cox. Accessible from:
http://www.theory-talks.org/2010/03/theory-talk-37.html
• Cuita, F. & Klinke, I. (2010). Lost in conceptualization: reading the “new Cold War“ with
critical geopolitics. Political Geography, Vol. 29, No. 6. Accessible from ScienceDirect.com
database.
• Daniel, J. & Turcsányi, R. (2015). The Challenges of Central European Security: Critical Insights.
Brno: Masarykova univerzita. Accessible from: http://www.globalpolitics.cz/wp-
content/uploads/2015/04/Challenges_of_central_european_security.pdf
• Epstein, M. Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. In: Seale, C. (2012, Ed.). Researching
Society and Culture. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
• Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Meeting of the Aristotelian Society.
London: Bedford Square, 21: London, W.C.1.
• Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 6,
No. 3. Accessible from Jstor database.
• Gerring, J. (1999). What Makes a Concept Good? Polity, Vol. 31, No. 3. Accessible from Jstor
database.
• Gill, S., Law, D. (1988). The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems, and Policies.
Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Gilpin, R. (1986). The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton
University Press, pp. 65-117.
• Hinnebusch, R. (2003). The International Politics of the Middle East. Manchester and New
York: Manchester University Press.
• Hopf, T. (2010). The logic of habit in International Relations. European Journal of
International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 539-561.
• Human Security Now. Final Report. (2003). Commission on Human Security. New York.
Accessible from:
http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/91BAEEDBA50C6907C1256D19006A9
353-chs-security-may03.pdf
22
• Huysmans, J. (1998). Security! What do you mean? From concept to thick signifier. European
Journal of International Relations, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 226-255. Accessible from SAGE database.
• Huysmans, J. (2002). Defining Social Constructivism in Security Studies: The Normative
Dilemma of Writing Security. Alternatives, Vol. 27. pp. 41-62.
• James, L. & Morgan, P. (1999). Security Studies Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). The Culture of National Security. New York: Columbia University
Press.
• King, G. & Murray, Ch. J. (2002). Rethinking Human Security. Political Science Quarterly, Vol.
116, pp. 585–610. Accessible from Wiley database.
• Kirchner, E. & Berk, C. (2010). European Energy Security Co-operation: Between Amity and
Enmity. Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 48, Issue 4. Accessible from Wiley database.
• Klare, M. T. (2008). Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet: The New Geopolitics of Energy.
Transcription of conference. Accessible from:
http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/studio/multimedia/20080514/0041.html/_res/id=sa_File1/
Rising_Powers_Shrinking_Planet.pdf
• Kolodziej, E. A. (1992). What is security and security studies? Lessons from the cold war.
Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1-31. Accessible from Taylor and Francis
database.
• Krause, K. & Williams, M. (1996). Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and
Methods. Mershon International Studies Review, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 229-254. Accessible from
Jstor database.
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
• Lupták, Ľ. (2011). Bezpečnostný diskurz v SR: lokalizácia ne(o)liberálneho vládnutia
v postsocialistickom barbaricu. Disertační práce. Plzeň: Západočeská univerzita v Plzni.
Dostupné z: https://theses.cz/id/f6bkh0/
• Marsh, D. & Stoker, G. (2002, Eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science. Hampshire:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 17-41.
• McDonald, M. (2008). Securitization and the Construction of Security. European Journal of
International Relations, Vol. 14, No. 4. Accessible from SAGE database.
• Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Mérand, F. (2006). Social Representations in the European Security and Defence Policy.
Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 131–152. Accessible from SAGE database.
• Müller, M. (2015). Assemblages and Actor-networks: Rethinking Socio-material Power,
Politics and Space. Geography Compass, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 27-41. Accessible from Wiley
database.
• Nordhaus, W. (2009). The Economics of an Integrated World Oil Market. Keynote Address at
International Energy Workshop.
• Nye, J. (2006). The Wrong Way to Think About Oil. Project Syndicate.
• O´Tuathail, G. (1996). Critical geopolitics: the politics of writing global space (Barrows
lectures). University of Minnesota press.
• Ocelík, P. & Osička, J. (2014). The framing of unconventional natural gas resources in the
foreign energy policy discourse of the Russian Federation. Energy Policy, Vol. 72. Accessible
from ScienceDirect.com database.
23
• Ocelík, P., Osička, J., Zapletalová, V., Černoch, F., Dančák, B. (2017). Local opposition and
acceptance of a deep geological repository of radioactive waste in the Czech Republic: A
frame analysis. Energy Policy, Vol. 105, pp. 458-466.
• Oels, A. From Securitization of Climate Change to Climatization of the Security Field:
Comparing Three Theoretical Perspectives. In: Scheffran, J., Brzoska, M., Brauch H. G., Link, P.
M., and Schilling, J. (Eds., 2012). Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict. Vol. 8
of the series Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, pp. 185-205.
• Palonkorpi, M. (2008). Matter over Mind? Securitizing Regional Energy Interdependencies.
Aleksanteri Institute, University of Helsinki. Accessible from:
http://www.ii.umich.edu/UMICH/ceseuc/Home/Academics/Research%20Projects/Energy%2
0Security%20in%20Europe%20and%20Eurasia/Matter%20Over%20Mind%20-
%20Palonkorpi.pdf
• Pascual, C. & Zambetakis, E. The Geopolitics of Energy. From Security to Survival. In: Pascual,
C. & Elkind, J. (2009, Eds.). Energy Security. Economics, Politics, Strategies, and Implications.
Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
• Peoples, C. & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2010). Critical security studies. An introduction. London
and New York: Routledge, pp. 62-74.
• Peoples, C. & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2010). Critical security studies. An introduction. London
and New York: Routledge.
• Pouliot, V. (2008). The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities.
International Organization, Vol. 62, No. 2, pp 257-288. Accessible from Jstor database.
• Prange-Gstöhl, H. (2009). Enlarging the EU´s internal energy market: Why would third
countries accept EU rule export? Energy policy, Vol. 37, No. 12.
• Reuveny, R., & Kang, H. (1998). Bilateral trade and political conflict/cooperation: Do goods
matter? Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 35, No. 5.
• Rychnovská, D., Pasgaard, M., and Berling, T. V. (2017). Science and security expertise:
Authority, knowledge, subjectivity. Geoforum, Vol. 84. Accessible from Science Direct
database.
• Salter, M. (2008). When the exception becomes the rule: borders, sovereignty, and
citizenship. Citizenship Studies, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 365-380. Accessible from Taylor & Francis
database.
• Salter, M. B. The practice turn: Introduction. In: Salter, M. B., Mutlu, C. E. (2013, Eds.):
Research Methods in Critical Security Studies: An Introduction. London and New York:
Routledge, pp. 85–91.
• Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin Group.
• Shaw, M. (1993). There is no such thing as society: Beyond individualism and statism in
international security studies. Review of International Studies, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 159-175.
Accessible from Jstor database.
• Sovacool, B. K. (2006). Reactors, weapons, x-rays, and solar panels: Using SCOT, technological
frame, epistemic culture, and actor network theory to investigate technology. Journal of
Technology Studies, Vol. 32, pp. 4-14.
• Van Evera, S. (1995). Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca: Cornell
University Press, pp. 7-15.
• Wallerstein, I. (1984). The Politics of the World-Economy: The States, the Movements and the
Civilizations. Cambridge University Press.
24
• Walt, S. (1991). The Renaissance of Security Studies. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 35,
No. 2, pp. 211-239. Accessible from Jstor database.
• Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
• Weldes, Y. (1996). Constructing National Interest. European Journal of International
Relations, Vol. 2, No. 3. Accessible from SAGE database.
• Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of international Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
• Wight, C. (2006). Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology.
Cambridge University Press.
• Wolfers, A. (1952). “National Security” as an Ambiguous Symbol. Political Science Quarterly,
Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 481-502. Accessible from Jstor database.
• Yergin, D. (2006). Ensuring Energy Security. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85, No. 2. Accessible from:
http://www.un.org/ga/61/second/daniel_yergin_energysecurity.pdf
• Ziegler, Ch. E. (2013). Energy Pipeline Networks and Trust: The European Union and Russia in
Comparative Perspective. International Relations, Vol. 27. Accessible from SAGE.
Populární kultura
• Bertolucci, B. (1970). Il Conformista.
• Blomkamp, N. (2009). District 9.
• Blomkamp, N. (2013). Elysium.
• Burger, N. (2014). Divergent.
• Burton, L. (2005). Star Trek Enterprise: Demons (S04E20).
• Cuarón, A. (2018). Roma.
• Joon-ho, B. (2019). Parasite.
• Kolbe, W. (1991). Star Trek Next Generation: Darmok (S05E02).
• Kroeker, A. (2003). Star Trek Enterprise: The Expanse (S02E26).
• Kroeker, A. (2003). Star Trek Enterprise: The Xindi (S03E01).
• Landau, L. (1996). Star Trek Voyager: Alliances (S02E14).
• Lang, F. (1927). Metropolis.
• Lederman, R. (1992). Star Trek Next Generation: I, Borg (S05E23).
• Livingston, D. (1996). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: Homefront (S04E11).
• Lobl, V. (1998). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: In the Pale Moonlight (S06E19).
• Lorraine, L. (2012). The Other Son.
• Lucas, G. (1999). Star Wars. Episode I: The Phantom Menace.
• Lucas, G. (2002). Star Wars. Episode II Attack of the Clones.
• Lucas, G. (2005). Star Wars. Episode III Revenge of the Sith.
• Moore, R.D. (1996). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: For the Cause (S04E22).
• Moore, R.D. (1996). Star Trek Deep Space Nine: Paradise Lost (S04E12).
• Niccol. A. (2011). In Time.
• PBS. (2011). Salmon: Running the Gauntlet (Nature Episode S29E13).
• Rush, M.V. (2005). Star Trek Enterprise: Terra Prime (S04E21).
• Shyamalan, M.N. (2004). The Village.
• Spielberg, S. (2004). Terminal.
25
• Spielberg, S. (2015). Bridge of Spies.
• The Wachowskis. (1999). The Matrix.
• Villeneuve, D. (2016). Arrival.
• Windell, T. (2000). Star Trek Voyager: Critical Care (S07E08).