European Union Public Policy Professor John Wilton Lecture 2 Agenda-Setting 1: Role and purpose, EU political process, and the nature of agendas European Union Public Policy Lecture 2 Additional Sources: Princen, S. (2007) ‘Agenda-setting in the E.U.: a theoretical exploration and agenda for research’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14:1, pp.21-38. Princen, S. (2011) “Agenda-setting strategies in E.U. policy processes’, in the Journal of European Public Policy, Vol.18, no.7, pp.927-943. Warleigh-Lack, A. and Drachenberg, R. (2011) ‘Spillover in a soft policy era? Evidence from the Open Method of Co- ordination in education and training’, in the Journal of European Public Policy, Vol.18, no.7, pp.999-1015 European Union Public Policy Lecture 2 1. The place of agenda-setting in the policy process – its role and purpose 2. Agenda-setting as a political process – its distinctive aspect in the EU policy process 3. The nature of agendas – the social construction of policy issues 4. Fragmentation 5. Absence of effective policy co-ordination; 6. Proto-Federalism European Union Public Policy Lecture 2 1. The place of agenda-setting in the policy process - key difference between EU and individual states - link between agenda-setting and the EU integration process European Union Public Policy Lecture 2 2. Agenda-setting as a political process a) the identification, determination and clarification of the issue b) the social and political construction of the issue European Union Public Policy Lecture 2 3. The nature of agendas - differing interpretations of issues, agendas and policies - danger of different forms of policy outcomes - negative agenda-setting European Union Public Policy Lecture 2 3. The nature of agendas - The pre-agenda process - contending ideas - advocacy - learning, and knowledge of - information - political debate - political difference and/or agreement European Union Public Policy Lecture 2 3. The nature of agendas - first stage of agenda-setting – social construction of the issue - additional agenda ‘spillover’ - avoiding conflict between national interests and EU interests in agenda-setting European Union Public Policy Lecture 2 4. Fragmentation a) the ‘barrier’ (the EU Commission) b) opportunities – many ‘avenues’ and ‘ways in’ to the agenda-setting process European Union Public Policy Lecture 2 4. Fragmentation of EU Public Policy agenda-setting – due to: a) the role, ambitions and interests of EU Commissioners; b) the role, ambitions and interests of Director-Generals; c) the blurred boundaries and responsibilities of Director-Generals; d) the interests of the Member States in the Council of Ministers; e) The European Parliament ‘shadow committees’ f) The E.U. court system. European Union Public Policy Lecture 2 5. The absence of effective Public Policy co-ordination a) lack of political party cohesion (751 MEPs, 13 political groupings) b) the influence of national policy styles and ‘policy’ cultures European Union Public Policy Lecture 2 6. Proto-Federalism - a divided territorial structure influences pattern of agenda-setting - regional government structure developed = more territorial divided institutional EU bodies for individuals and groups to push and argue own public policy agenda -provides multi-access to public policy agenda – fragmentation or diversity? – good or bad?