The perfect neoliberal economic revolution a critical reflection •Neoliberal revolution (1990) in East Central Europe (ECE: CZE, POL, HUN, SLK) a perfect shot of neoliberalism… •ECE: fundamental redesign of economy, polity, society according principles of Western market economies… –Highest legitimacy and popular support (for 25 years); – •Favorable geographic (proximity, infrastructure), economic (industrialized, easily profitable) political (plur. democracy = market economy), social conditions (skilled, educated, egalitarian)… • •What is (so far) the outcome of this historic opportunity? CZE a perfect planed economy •Level of state´s control of the economy second only to the USSR; •By 1990 CZE: untouched by any liberalization (vs. YUG, POL, HUN, USSR); –87% of product in SOEs, another 10% in socialist cooperatives (together 98,9% of employment); –Export to GDP: 19,4% (low for small economy), 70% through CMEA (i.e. official bilateral agreements); –Foreign trade: state-run monopoly; –Foreign investment negligible; –Banking system: single state-owned national bank… • CZE a perfect neoliberal reform •Neoliberal/monetarist dominated: –CZE policymakers and business; – neoliberal doctrine dominant in EU (climax SEA 1987: deregulation as a solution for decreasing intern. competitive Vs. US)… •Accession process of ECE into EU -> rapid reforms of political, socioeconomic, law institutions; compatible with EU; –Early 1990s: radical privatization; deregulation of foreign trade; currency convertibility; –Late 1990s: no capital controls, little industrial policies; domestic manufacturing industry, financial services, utilities – sold to foreign investors; •Strong incentives to attract FDIs (investment protection, tax breaks, infrastructure development); •CZE by 2014: 67% of manufacturing production and 96% of assets in banking sector under control of foreign capital. • ECE – a perfect economic integration (a distinct model) •Independentist: development of domestic industrial base, using domestic capital, graduating economy (independent developed national economy); (East Asia) • •Integrationists: much of capital comes from abroad – domestic industry is developed through spillovers – learning, upgrading (goal: independent developed national economy); (LATAM, old E periphery) (A. Amsden 2001) • •Hyper-integrationists: domestic firms overtaken by foreign capital, put out of business or pushed to lowest value added segments (low tier suppliers); spillovers, graduation out of question; de facto discriminated compared to foreign investors; (goal: western standard of living); (ECE) (Scepanovic 2013). ECE – a perfect catch-up •FDIs: financial and physical capital, up to date technology, business organization; •Result: rapid growth of productivity, strong competitiveness - complex industrial goods (cars, electronics); • •Unlike other regions: –mature goods for domestic markets (LATAM); –or simpler phase of prod. process for international market (SEA) –in ECE: final product assembled from intermediates locally produced – but by (follow up strategy) foreign owned firms; – •Goal of the operation: to use skilled low cost labor for production activities… in order to supply WE markets; –Vs. headquarters in core economies - keeps central management; RD; design; provision of financial and physical capital and intangible assets… Export % Import % Balance Food and livestock 2,498,265 1.5 3,928,424 2.8 -1,430,159 Beverages and tobacco 930,420 0.6 512,440 0.4 417,980 Crude materials 2,062,152 1.3 1,146,874 0.8 915,277 Mineral fuels 1,244,272 0.8 1,848,437 1.3 -604,165 Oils, fats and waxes 172,978 0.1 149,819 0.1 23,160 Chemicals 4,840,870 3.0 10,875,187 7.6 -6,034,317 Manu. goods classif. by material 15,292,121 9.4 13,666,540 9.6 1,625,581 Machinery and transport eq. -USD/Kg 61,276,432 12.00 37.6 30,156,172 10.20 21.1 31,120,260 Misc. manufactured articles -USD/Kg 14,587,232 8.61 9.0 7,463,362 7.39 5.2 7,123,870 Commodities 227,811 0.1 147,720 0.1 80,091 Total 63.4 49.0 33,237,578 Czech trade with EU15 2016 – goods (SITC 1 classification; value in thousands of USD) CZE - EU15 (AICs) surplus: 17.23% GDP (CH 4,55%; GER 8,22%; KOR 6,32%; JAP 0,77%) Code Item Share in export Export USD/Kg Share in import Import USD/Kg Most traded items 7522 Portable autom. data proces. machines,<10kg 1.1 268.13 0.4 299.99 75997 Parts for the machines of group 752 0.6 87.44 0.3 126.68 77316 Electric conductors, <1,000 V 0.5 6.54 0.3 5.93 77642 Processors and controllers 0.6 144.92 0.9 364.78 7812 Motor vehicles for the transport of persons 7.9 11.05 1.8 11.53 78432 Other parts and accessories of bodies 2.0 7.27 0.7 4.57 78433 Brakes and servo-brakes and parts thereof 0.9 7.81 0.5 6.45 78434 Gearboxes 0.3 15.34 0.4 14.13 78439 Other parts and accessories for motor vehicles 2.6 8.80 1.5 7.92 82119 Parts of the seats of subgroup 821.2 0.9 9.55 0.4 5.36 89399 Other articles 0.5 8.30 0.7 6.75 Other largest CZE exports 74159 Parts for the air-conditioning machines 0,.6 12.03 0.1 7.65 7422 Fuel, lubricating or cooling medium pumps 0.6 29.77 0.1 22.41 7523 Other autom. data process. machines 1.1 57.84 0.1 101.47 7527 Storage units 0.6 224.41 0.1 200.04 7616 Reception apparatus for television 0.5 24.56 0.0 38.02 76411 Telephone sets (incl. cellular, wireless) 1.0 981.58 0.2 752.15 76412 Other apparatus for voice, data transmission 0.7 245.28 0.1 118.64 77261 Equipment for control of electric., <1,000 V 0.5 47.12 0.3 53.70 77834 Electrical lighting/signalling equipment 1.0 28.92 0.1 28.89 82112 Seats of a kind used for motor vehicles 0.5 9.47 0.0 5.36 8942 Toys 1.0 19.91 0.2 9.25 Most traded items - Czech trade with EU15 in 2016 (SITC items groups 7 and 8; SITC 5) Perfect domination by foreign capital •Despite large trade surplus (both goods and services) – Current Account of CZE in deficit untill 2013; reason: extremely passive international investment position; –Large deficit of primary income balance: most significant was repatriation of income from FDIs -> negative net balance equals 8,2% GDP in 2016; –Crisis 2008 led to rapid decrease of (already small) earnings from CZE investments Vs. no decrease for profits from foreign investments in CZE (profits the same story: 2009 big fall for domestic companies, profitability of foreign owned decreased little); – •Net primary income per capita is exceptionally negative… compared to all industrial AICs and DCs (exc. Ireland, Luxembourg…); •Capital inflows are gradually slowing down – since 2012 there is an overall outflow of investments; •…despite highest profitability of business in OECD (e.g. CZE banks easily most profitable in EU during 2008-2014); •Repatriation of profits from CZE Vs. reinvestment of profits and upgrading of firms in CZE. FDI Payments and receips 2019 Payments Receips Balance CZE 20,753 4,608 -16,145 POL 22,806 2,044 -20,762 HUN 9,404 2,083 -732 GER 53,052 121,903 68,851 USA 208,140 532,724 32,4584 SPA 26,860 35,978 9,118 ITA 17,824 28,628 10,804 GRE 1,868 935 -933 balance per capita bal. 2019 p/c 2019 CZ -11,169 -1,052.6 -12,707 -1,190.9 Core industrial economies Germany 57,164 697.9 124,402 1,497.2 France 54,078 835.6 UK -32,357 -491.8 US 180,589 560.5 236,344 719.9 Japan 166,550 1,303.7 Korea Rep. 1,459 28.7 Other emerging markets Poland -17,571 -459.7 -22,828 -601.2 Spain 737 15.9 Turkey -8,991 -113.1 Mexico -33,598 -263.4 Brazil -41,080 -197.8 China -44,013 -31.4 Primary income balance 2016 and 2019 (mill. USD; USD per capita) Inward FDI Outward FDI Balance FDI stocks Net primary income (mil.) Net primary income Italy 22 29 7 11,797 0,6 Spain 47 43 -4 49 0,0 Portugal 60 24 -36 -5,442 -2.5 Greece 16 10 -6 20 0,0 Czechia 72 11 -61 -11,424 -5.3 Poland 45 5 -40 -20,218 -3.8 Slovakia 58 4 -54 -2,255 -2.4 Hungary 65 21 -44 -5,756 -4.1 FDI stocks; net primary income (percent of GDP, 2017, USD) Industry Finances and insurance Other services Other Total CZE 16.2 10.0 10.7 17.5 13 Japan 5.1 17.8 10.7 18.2 10 Poland 13.3 10.3 7.4 3.5 10 Hungary 15.2 8.4 5.7 3.9 9 Estonia 13.0 7.9 9.9 4.7 9 Austria 18.7 9.1 3.5 7.7 9 Sweden 7.6 8.2 8.1 3.0 7 Denmark 4.4 3.0 7.4 - 7 United Kingdom 5.1 4.0 8.1 8.0 6 USA 6.2 4.7 5.7 6.6 6 Netherlands 3.9 6.2 1.6 9.3 5 Italy 4.2 2.9 3.9 2.1 3 Spain 4.7 4.2 3.0 0.1 3 Slovenia 12.7 -2.5 -17.7 -7.3 0 Korea -0.7 -0.9 -0.2 -0.7 -1 Ireland 24.7 5.8 - 0.0 - The profit rate of foreign investments situated in countries (OECD 2014) CZE banks: easily highest RoA and RoE indicators in whole EU. Immediate investing country Ultimate investing country Netherlands 24.0 5.2 Austria 13.2 9.5 Germany 12.6 26.5 Luxembourg 12.1 3.0 France 6.1 6.4 Switzerland 4.7 2.8 Cyprus 3.9 3.2 Slovakia 3.8 2.8 US 3.6 8.9 UK 2.6 4.6 Foreign direct investment in the CZ – territorial structure 2014 (percentage), immediate and ultimate investors Poor ability to retain FDIs •CZE economy is extensively incorporated into global value chains; •OECD input-output tables: CZE has the lowest and declining value added (VA) among members; lower than figure usual for DCs; •Domestic VA only 35.5% in overall product (e.g. cars 18.3%); 54.7% in exports (e.g. cars 46.4%); •In context of complete product processing (including intermediate parts… e.g. Skoda cars) on its territory – it raises questions about transfer pricing: –arbitrary set prices of specialized services provision or provision of intangible assets by concern headquarters; manipulation with cost of financing and credit). 1995 2000 2005 2008 2011 CZE Gross Output 39.41 38.32 37.30 35.98 35.54 - motor vehicles 18.18 17.09 19.70 20.36 18.25 - electronics 27.85 22.13 13.14 8.55 9.75 Germany Gross Output 54.48 51.68 51.41 49.33 48.98 - motor vehicles 33.68 23.37 24.52 22.35 27.11 - electronics 41.73 37.82 41.16 39.19 42.94 Mexico Gross Output 58.47 57.44 58.81 57.70 59.04 - motor vehicles 32.27 34.18 34.32 34.09 33.97 - electronics 18.26 19.41 13.73 11.85 13.54 Portugal Gross Output 48.05 47.92 48.39 46.94 48.20 - motor vehicles 10.94 19.16 16.92 14.93 15.74 - electronics 23.59 22.30 16.52 15.77 20.62 Spain Gross Output 49.19 48.41 46.94 48.34 52.00 - motor vehicles 22.59 19.56 18.95 18.72 19.55 - electronics 33.17 28.00 27.30 31.91 43.85 Turkey Gross Output 53.15 54.84 43.43 44.89 44.56 - motor vehicles 36.2 37.35 19.49 20.22 19.27 - electronics 52.55 40.49 17.80 21.80 25.97 Brazil Gross Output 53.33 51.02 48.70 48.60 50.57 - motor vehicles 23.01 20.81 15.16 17.53 17.58 - electronics 19.28 24.76 20.19 22.29 21.76 Indonesia Gross Output 52.10 49.90 51.63 51.38 51.86 - motor vehicles 35.49 24.59 43.90 43.99 45.00 - electronics 24.29 30.47 35.43 35.43 35.46 Malaysia Gross Output 46.32 36.81 31.12 34.03 34.65 - motor vehicles 35.90 20.83 15.02 16.03 17.60 - electronics 33.92 17.87 12.66 16.13 16.44 Domestic value added as a percentage of gross output (motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers; and computer, electronic and optical equipment; in percentage) 1995 2000 2005 2008 2011 CZE Gross Exports 30.47 38.73 42.55 42.31 45.28 - motor vehicles 55.12 50.55 52.42 51.11 53.56 - electronics 45.49 49.76 70.13 65.18 67.08 Germany Gross Exports 14.86 20.22 21.34 24.77 25.54 - motor vehicles 20.03 27.29 28.32 32.36 31.43 - electronics 18.68 24.51 23.88 27.56 24.49 Mexico Gross Exports 27.34 34.39 33.03 32.75 31.71 - motor vehicles 40.80 48.76 46.98 47.81 49.61 - electronics 62.01 64.20 69.37 69.72 64.11 Portugal Gross Exports 27.37 30.18 31.81 33.81 32.78 - motor vehicles 56.47 55.12 58.23 60.13 58.33 - electronics 47.42 50.39 55.10 61.60 52.45 Spain Gross Exports 19.16 25.83 26.28 27.58 26.88 - motor vehicles 36.47 47.04 46.64 46.32 46.09 - electronics 28.12 39.75 40.72 34.95 29.12 Turkey Gross Exports 8.94 13.06 20.96 2499 25.73 - motor vehicles 13.16 29.05 36.29 38.13 44.20 - electronics 18.13 33.61 40.63 37.44 38.93 Brazil Gross Exports 7.83 11.46 11.71 12.54 10.77 - motor vehicles 12.68 17.88 20.14 22.31 19.92 - electronics 17.59 27.42 27.19 26.98 24.08 Indonesia Gross Exports 12.57 17.37 16.56 14.62 11.97 - motor vehicles 33.25 32.13 27.85 29.59 25.47 - electronics 34.82 27.76 26.55 29.72 27.11 Malaysia Gross Exports 30.50 47.73 45.95 41.23 40.62 - motor vehicles 38.65 50.20 62.34 59.91 59.11 - electronics 45.81 70.20 70.74 67.16 66.83 Foreign value added as a share of gross exports (exports of “motor vehicles, trailers, and semi-trailers” and of “computers, electronics and optical Equipment;” in percentage) Poor convergence record •Great recession (since 2008) unveiled some less evident problems of CZE (and ECE) convergence process; •Real consumption in CZE stagnated 2008-2014; consumption grew slowly even before vs. solid growth of GDP/capita (outflow of profits); •For whole period 1990-2016 the CZE indicator improved by only 5.5% towards US level (15.7% to GER)(1990=100). •If extrapolated – this pace would result in catch-up by year 2814 (US) resp. 2146 (GER); •Hyper-integrationist model delivered limited (CZE) or moderate (ECE) economic convergence; •Doesn't outperform other contemporary nor historical examples of (partials) catch-ups (consumption, GDP/cap). 1990 2000 2008 2010 2018 2019 Czechia 23.66 25.05 34.71 33.51 39.45 40.31 Poland 11.32 16.23 22.46 23.98 31.77 33.09 Hungary 16.54 19.55 25.98 24.49 31.07 32.62 Slovakia 16.09 26.14 26.07 32.07 32.79 Italy 36.77 43.27 44.84 42.87 42.20 42.41 Spain 27.60 34.83 39.32 37.00 40.33 40.88 Portugal 23.59 30.42 32.35 31.84 34.01 34.80 Greece 24.46 29.37 37.70 33.97 29.71 30.32 GDP/capita (PPP, thousands of 2017 constant USD) GDP per capita GNI Consumption Italy 39,421 39,421 21,535 Spain 38,006 37,990 19,661 Portugal 31,673 30,980 18,047 Greece 27,602 27,620 17,095 Czechia 36,327 34,450 15,634 Poland 29,124 27,970 16,145 Slovakia 31,616 30,880 15,555 Hungary 28,108 26,960 12,710 EU 28 41,192 41,074 20,938 limit for CF 36,967 Standard of living, V4 and SE comparison (2017, USD) Dorothee Bohle & Béla Greskovits (2018): Politicising embedded neoliberalism: continuity and change in Hungary’s development model, West European Politics Poor perspective of graduation •Division of labor between particular activities within one chain of activities inside one corporate structure – but on territories of different national economies; •Headquarters can assign value to particular activities -> decrease value added and reported productivity in controlled firm -> decrease in reported productivity -> can justify low wages; –Graduation unlikely: productivity (higher VA content) increase leads to growth of wages = inconvenient side effect; –Goal of foreign investors: keep profitability of activities conducted in investors´ home (high wage) country; – •Private business expenditures on RD in CZE low as share of GDP and per capita; fragment of investments by core economies…. (hard to imagine how CZE could converge…). • R&D, percent of GDP R&D per capita (USD, PPP) Researchers per million inhabitants Universities in top 500 (top 800) H2020 allocation (mill. Euro) H2020 (Euro per capita) Sweden 3.34 1798 6875 11 (11) 1,970 195.1 Austria 3.17 1752 4947 7 (11) 1,630 181.0 Czechia 1.93 754 3402 1 (3) 423 39.5 Poland 1.21 381 2064 0 (1) 633 16.7 Italy 1.40 581 1956 26 (48) 4,830 79.9 Spain 1.24 494 2613 7 (21) 5,350 114.4 Portugal 1.37 452 3662 3 (8) 972 95.3 Greece 1.18 355 2791 2 (7) 1,410 135.3 Selected R&D indicators (2019, 2020) http://www.roomsterclub.com/obrazky/tovarna/01b.jpg http://www.ceskatelevize.cz/ct24/sites/default/files/styles/scale_1180/public/images/1562640-644086 .jpg?itok=5QW10PXb