pruh+znak_PF_13_gray5+fialovy_RGB PF_PPT_en Selected Problems of the Czech Criminal Law – Introduction Criminal Liability in the Czech criminal law www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Criminal law reform after 1989 n The reform of criminal law started in 1990, after the „Velvet Revolution“ in November 1989 n2 phases of reform -phase of amendments – numerous amendments to Penal Code a Code of Penal Procedure reflecting the democratic and social changes and also the fact that Czech Republic became a Member State of EU in 2004 have been accepted since 1990 -phase of recodification – the concept of three penal laws (codes) was introduced n •2 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 nabolition of death penalty 1990 + introduction of new conception of exceptional punishment: imprisonment over 15 to 25 years and life imprisonment nabolition of 33 criminal offences based on on the ruling ideology of the Communist party (for example Leaving of the Republic,Dishonouring of the Socialistic State, Subversion of Republic, the extended protection of socialistic property…) nthe new conception of criminal liability in the case ot the culpable insanity nintroduction of new criminal offences responding new social phenomena a changes (especially in the area of economic crimes, for example Insider Trading, new forms of fraud, crimes connected with public tenders, …. nthe idea of alternative punishment: introduction of probation, community service, diversions in the criminal proceedings (conditional suspension of the criminal prosecution, settlement) •3 The most important changes www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Recodification nthe concept of three criminal laws -Criminal Code – since January 1, 2010 - -Juvenile Justice Act – since January 1, 2004 n -Criminal Liability of Legal Persons Act – since January 1, 2012. •4 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Juvenile Justice Act nThis act gives coherent legal regulation of criminal liability and punishment of juveniles (persons between 15 and 18 years of age) together with the legal regulation of criminal proceedings in cases of juvenile. It is related to the matters of minors (children under 15), as well. nThis law extended the application of the new principle of restorative justice into Czech criminal law nThe system of sanctions for juveniles is based on the united system of measures, which are divided into educational, protective and criminal measures. The purpose of these measures is to create conditions for sociable and personal development of the juvenile with respect of his/her mental and moral level, personal character, family background and protection from the negative effects and prevention from committing other transgressions. •5 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 General characteristic of the NCC nintroduction of a formal concept of a criminal offence (hereinafter „offence“) nthe binary categorisation of offences nmisdemeanor and felony nextention of the system of sanctions (new alternative punishments – house arrest, prohibition of entry to sporting, cultural and other social events, protective detention) nstricter punishment in cases of the particularly serious felonies and plural criminal activity nnew systematic arrangement of the Special Part of Criminal Code following human rights attitude nIntroduction of new offences, for example new type of a murder, manslaughter, harm to health out of excusable motives,… n •6 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 nnullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege – „only the law shall determine which acts constitute an offence and what penalties or other detriments to rights or property may be imposed on them“ (Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms, Article 39) n n n •7 The principle of legality www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Criminal Act in the NCC nAccording to Section 13 para 1 of the NCC, an offence shall be an unlawful act which is described as criminal in the Criminal Code and the features of which are laid down in this Code. nThis definiton expreses formal concept of the criminal act. n •8 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 The binary categorisation nOffences are divided into misdemeanors and felonies. nMisdemeanors shall be all negligent offences and these intentional offences with a maximal term of imprisonment not exceeding five years. nFelonies shall be all offences which shall not be considered an offences. nParticularly serious felonies – felonies with a maximal term of imprisonment of at least 10 years of imprisonment nparticularly serious felonies are a subcategory of felonies, not a separate category nJuvenile Justice Act knows only one category - transgression n n •9 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 nAccording to Section 3 para 1 of the previous Criminal Code, a criminal offence shall be an act which is dangerous to the society and the features of which laid down in this Code. According to Section 3 para 2, an act whose degree of danger to society is negligible shall not be considered a criminal offence, even though it may othervise have elements of a criminal offence. nAccording the Juvenile Justice Act, an act whose degree of danger to society is small shall not be considered a criminal offence….. nThe degree of danger to the society shall be determined in particular by the significance of the protected interests affected by such an act, the manner in which the act is committed and its consequences, the circumstances under which the act is committed, the person of the perpetrator and the degree of his culpability and motives. n n •10 Criminal Act in the previous CC www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 The ultima ratio principle in NCC nSection 12 para 2 n the criminal liability and its legal consequences may be only applied in socially harmful cases if application of liability under another legal regualation is not sufficient. •11 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 The use of the ultima ratio principle nAt first problematic reception by the praxis nsocial harm = social danger vs. strict formal approach nDisharmony even at the Supreme court nUnifying opinion of its criminal division nultima ratio as a principle of legislation nultima ratio as a corrective of interpretation ndirect application of the principle nthe individual case does not reach even the lower boarder of criminality •12 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Body of an offence ncan be defined as a complex of formal elements (characteristics) which has to be accomplish nobject nperpetrator nobjective part (aspect) –actus reus nsubjective part (aspect)–means rea n •13 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Object of an offence nInterests, relations and values protected by criminal law nLife, health, freedom, property, family, humanity, public order, economics etc. n •14 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 A perpetrator nAge - a person who has not reached fifteen years of age at the time an offence is committed shall no be criminal liable (CC, Section 25) nSanity – a person who was not able, due to his mental disorder, to recognize the illegality of his acting or control it, he shall not be criminally liable for his act (CC, Section 25) nSpecial character or position of a perpetrator n n •15 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 A cupable insanity nDrunkeness: insanity caused by application of addictive substace + committing an act otherwise classified as offence nActio libera in causa dolosa: insanity caused with intention of committing an offence nActio libera in causa culposa: comitting a offence out of negligence consisting in entering into an insanity. n •16 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Objective part nacting – act of commission or act of omission nconsequence - violation or endangering of an interest protected ncausality n nManner in which the offence was committed, the place and time of committing n •17 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Subjective part nCulpability nthe intention is required as a regular condition of punishability, unless the Criminal Code expressly provides that the negligence is sufficient for committing a crime nMotive n n •18 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Intent nDirect intent – the perpetrator was aware that he (she) could violate or endanger an interest protected by the Criminal Code and wanted to cause such violation or endagering. nIndirect intent – the perpetrator was aware that he(she) could to violate or endanger an interest protected by the Criminal Code and, if he (she) caused such violation or endangering, he (she) agreed with its result •19 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Negligence nWilful negligence – the perpetrator knew that he (she) could violate or endanger an interest protected by the Criminal Code, but without adequate reasons he (she) believed he (she) would not cause such violation or endangering. n Unwilful negligence – the perpetrator did not know that his (her) acting could violate or endanger an interest protected by the Criminal Code, although, with respect to the circumstances and his (her) personal situation, he (she) should and could have known •20 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Other forms of offences nAccording to Section 111 offence means also preparation for a criminal act, attempted offence (inchoate offences), organisation, abetting and assistance (complicity). nExtension of criminal liability nit stems from a committed (completed) offence, i. e. from the fulfillment of all elements of the body of an offence nsome of these elements are missing in respect to inchoate offences and n •21 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Inchoate offences nAttempt - § 21 CC nintentional offences only nthe perpetrator started to fulfill the body of a particular offence, but hasn’t finished yet nthe perpetrator has removed the last obstacle to fulfill the body of a particular offence nthere is nothing that prevents the perpetrator from committing the offence nPreparation - § 20 CC nonly particularly serious felonies where the CC explicitly states so nBoth attempt and preparation are punished in principle as committed offences •22 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Complicity - § 24 CC norganizing norchestratig or managing the committing of an offence nabetting ninstilling the idea of committing an offence in another nassistance nenabling or simplifying of commiting an offence by another nespecially providing instuments, removing obstacles, luring out the victim to the crime scene, patroling at the crime scene etc. nall forms are punished in principle as committed offences n •23 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Criminal Liability of Legal Persons nQuite a new idea in the Czech Republic nhistorically the Czech criminal law followed the doctrine Sociates deliquere non potest, pressure from the EU and international community instigated a change n§ 6 of Criminal Liability of Legal Persons Act (hereinafter „CLLP“) nlist of legal persons incapable of committing offences nthe state, local government units in exercise of public powers + foreign states and international organizations notherwise no exceptions (both private and public entities) n§ 7 of CLLP nexhaustive list of offences that cannot be committed by a legal person (e.g. maslaughter, infanticide by a mother, bigamy etc.) n n •24 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 How can a legal person commit a crime? nalways through a conduct of another person (§ 8/1 CLLP) ncould be another legal person, but it always ultimately is a natural person nstatutory body or its member, another person in leading position with right to represent the legal entity, person exercising managing or controlling activity, person with decisive influence (e.g. in a holding) nemployee in relation to his work assignment who was ordered or instructed to conduct in a particular way or who wasn’t prevented from doing so n n •25 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Accountability principle nquite strict nin principle, it is sufficient when some of aforementioned persons committs an offence on behalf of a legal entity or in the course of its activities nthe criminal liabilities of this person and of the legal entity are independent and separable nconditions for exclusion of criminal liability nthe legal person must have previously made all the effort to prevent such an offence from happening which can be fairly required from it (§ 8/5 CLLP) - compliance programs neffective remorse (§ 11 CLLP) – some offences are excluded n •26 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Other modifications nsuccession of criminal liability (§ 10 CLLP) non all of legal successors -> prevention from disposing of „toxic“ components to one successor ndifferent list of punishments nmodification of the scope of the act n n •27 www.law.muni.cz PF_PPT_nahled PF_PPT_en2 Thank you for your attention! n Now is a good time to ask any questions. •28