American  Literature,  1865–1910 Conclusion  and  paper  proposal It  is  impossible  to  prove  with  mathematical  certainty  that  when  we   talk  or  write  about  a  real-­‐world  we  are  not  in  massive  error  or   wholly  enclosed  within  an  ideological  order  of  things.  It  is,   however,  equally  impossible  to  prove  beyond  doubt  the   incommensurate  relativity  of  separate  worlds.  What  is  at  stake  is   the  possibility  of  community  and  the  potential  to  make  new   worlds.  This  is  the  inherent  utopianism  of  realism  as  art  form. • Pam  Morris,  Realism  (London:  Routledge,  2003),  p.  162. Ezra  Pound,  ‘A  Pact’ I  make  a  pact  with  you,  Walt  Whitman  -­‐ I  have  detested  you  long  enough. I  come  to  you  as  a  grown  child Who  has  had  a  pig-­‐headed  father; I  am  old  enough  now  to  make  friends. It  was  you  that  broke  the  new  wood, Now  is  a  time  for  carving. We  have  one  sap  and  one  root  -­‐ Let  there  be  commerce  between  us.   Purpose: To organize the results of your research, to articulate your main argument regarding a topic of your choice, to receive feedback from your instructor, to get ready to write the research paper. Content: A preliminary version of your main argument (Abstract), three research questions + a list of the primary as well as (at least four) secondary sources. Form: Title, a full paragraph or a detailed outline (200–300 words), an annotated list of sources using a recognised style guide (MLA, Chicago, MHRA [the last available here: http://www.mhra.org.uk/pdf/MHRA-Style- Guide-3rd-Edn.pdf.]) Bring this to our last class. Check access to Homework Vault on our course page on is.muni.cz. Submission deadline: 31 January Submit online in Homework Vault Length: 2,000 words Paper proposal and annotated bibliography Discuss class and nationality in Daisy Miller. Discuss nationality in Daisy Miller. RQ 1: What are the conflicts between different nationalities in the text? RQ 2: What modes of nationality were relevant at the time? RQ 3: What was James’s own experience of modes of nationality? Horne, Philip, ed., Henry James: A Life in Letters (New York: Library of America, 2016) [RQs 2 and 3] Wadsworth, Sarah, ‘What Daisy Knew: Reading Against Type in Daisy Miller: A Study’, in The Blackwell Companion to Henry James, ed. by Greg Zacharias (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008), pp. 32–50 [RQs 2 and 3] Barnett, L. K., ‘Jamesian Feminism: Women in Daisy Miller’, Studies in Short Fiction, 16 (1979), 281–87 [RQ 1] Bartlett, A. A., ‘Some pros and cons of travel abroad’, Old and New, 4.4 (October 1871) [RQ 2] What is the importance of nationality in Daisy Miller? Intro (250) Conflict between nationalities (500) Mrs Walker’s rejection of Daisy in Vevey in Rome Wadsworth’s ‘foreign lady’ James as feminist (Barnett)? Contemporary debates around Americanness (500) Bartlett’s travel writing James’s experience (500) Letters on travel in Europe (using index) Conclusion (250) What is the importance of nationality in Daisy Miller? Intro (250) Randolph’s critique of Europe Conflict (750) Mrs Walker’s rejection of Daisy (250) in Vevey in Rome Comparative lack of conflict around Wadsworth’s ‘foreign lady’ (250) James as feminist (Barnett)? (250) Modes of nationality (750) James’s letters on travel in Europe (using index) (250) Bartlett’s travel writing (250) Compare to Daisy and her mother Daisy as type (Wadsworth)? (250) Conclusion (250) Daisy’s death: reconciliation between nations or continued conflict? Winterbourne and Giovanelli’s conversation in the graveyard. Introductions State clearly what the paper is going to do. This paper will discuss the politics of Samuel Beckett’s writing in his 1982 play Catastrophe. Outline your research statement (referencing the title) It is my position that the political contexts in which Catastrophe was written must be taken into account when studying Beckett’s play. State how you are going to go about answering your research questions In order to examine the politics of Beckett’s work, we must analyse the events which led to the composition of his work, the details he decided to include while writing the play, and the reception of Catastrophe in performance. http://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/introducing-work/ Main body Link each paragraph to one of your research questions. Put these questions in the body of your text if this is suitable. What is the importance of the city in Joyce’s Dubliners? In order to answer this, I’m going to show that the rural west of Ireland functioned as a space which feeds the imagination of urban Irish nationalists in the early twentieth-century. New idea = new paragraph Use secondary sources to back up your points. Don’t just quote them uncritically. While A argues X, a closer analysis of ‘The Dead’ shows Y. As is argued in Hugh Kenner’s analysis of ‘The Dead’, narrative viewpoint is highlighted from the very first sentence. Conclusions Bring what you have done to an ending This paper has argued that the political contexts of Beckett’s Catastrophe must be taken into account for a full understanding of the play. Keep it shorter than your introduction. http://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/writing- conclusions/ Proofreading Proofread for structure Do my introduction, paragraphs and conclusion cohere? Is my argument clear? Do I do what I am going to say I’ll do? Proofread for detail Use spellcheck. Print out your paper or put it on a device other than your computer. Read it slowly, at least three times. Blow up the font on your laptop to 200%. Read it aloud.