its subjeot matter.
I I. -- v :. ,,*;9r& j616r $aywhatrbubelieve to be false.
. &q@hjnar&at fitWM& you lackedwuaw evidence.
?3-f&$e-eqab&of mwntxqI place a rinds maxim,namely,
$::q&&,,ytpcU&" the maxim WE is terse, its fbrmuWm oon;fx
&fil.rinmber of problems&at exercise me a load dsd: puestlons
,& @ t & q Y a t ~ ~ n tid& and focusa OF d a m e there may be,
h d w e&ift ih the come of a exoh~blge,how to allow for h e
'
foPr$uitmbje& of canvemtim are lagitimately changed, and so on.
1!&id Qe tmament of such questions exceedingly dlfflcult, and Ic- bspctrnravertto
them in a laterwork.
: M y , d e r the category of MANNER,which I understend as
' @&&g xtot (Wte the pswious categories)to what is said but, rakher,
. w ww+t is said' is to be said, E include the supmaxim-'%
penipicuw --and vrvious maxims such as:
-. I,,&;aidobgclltikyOEexpressIo1~.
I -, % ht4,idmb-.
0 i ~-BSSW P ~ W @ ) .
is moh that it shwld no6 be
co~~~tmating~ather maxinrq
b tthis lRax1mof Qudb
os the generalltl~df*
&ation ofthe presence of
osesan initid knowledge of the
will be a condition that
on of the expression's conle
for what starts life,
to become convencase
would require
@&wMonn, So, initiallyatleast, conversationd implicata are
'i"& &&the meanjng of l e expressions to the employment of
&& they atbeh.
-'% Sinpedte tr& of a conve~sationa~implicatum is not required
by Letmth of what is said (what is said may be true-what ~s
implicated may be .faIse), the impiicature is not by what is
said,but onlyby thesayingof whatis said, or by 'putting it that way.'
5. to d.~&tea canversational implicature is to calc&te
tobesupposed inordertopreservethe supposition &at.the
observed, and smce there may b ; ~
tions, a list of which may be ope&
m such cases wiU be disjunam of
if the list of these is open, the imjjliof
indeterminacy that many