Current Opinion in
Genetics & Development
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
^jji^ *%* ScienceDirect
ELSEVIER
New functions for an old variant: no substitute for histone H3.3
Simon J Elsaesser, Aaron D Goldberg and C David Allis
Histone proteins often come in different variants serving specialized functions in addition to their fundamental role in packaging DNA. The metazoan histone H3.3 has been most closely associated with active transcription. Its role in histone replacement at active genes and promoters is conserved to the single histone H3 in yeast. However, recent genetic studies in flies have challenged its importance as a mark of active chromatin, and revealed unexpected insights into essential functions of H3.3 in the germline. With strikingly little amino acid sequence difference to the canonical H3, H3.3 therefore accomplishes a surprising variety of cellular and developmental processes.
Address
Laboratory of Chromatin Biology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
Corresponding author: Elsaesser, Simon J (selsaesser@rockefeller.edu)
Introduction
Histone proteins form the core of the nucleosome—the fundamental repeating unit of chromatin. In a single nucleosome, approximately two superhelical turns of DNA wrap around an octamer of the core histone proteins H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. A wealth of discoveries in recent years has transformed our view of histones from static scaffolding proteins to modulators of virtually all processes that act on or depend on DNA, including replication and repair, regulation of gene expression, and maintenance of centromeres and telo-meres. Apart from the four core histones, metazoans have a number of histone variants such as H3.3, H2A.Z, and H2A.X that contain a distinct amino acid sequence and are expressed in different patterns throughout the cell cycle. Like histone posttranslational modifications (PTMs) and nucleosome remodeling, the use of histone variants contributes to the regulatory repertoire of chro-matin.
Histone H3 variants have distinct sequences and expression patterns
In metazoans, three main classes of histone H3 genes encode distinct H3 proteins: the 'canonical', replication-dependent histone H3, the replication-independent histone variant H3.3, and the centromeric H3 variant CENP-A [1,2]. Apart from the replication-dependent histone H3 shared by all metazoans (called by its systematic name H3.2 hereafter), mammals possess another replication-dependent variant H3.1 with a single amino acid substitution (Figure 1a). Two major exceptionally conserved differences account for unique functions of H3.1/ 2 and H3.3: differential expression during the cell cycle and amino acid variation in residues 87-90 of the histone core region (Figure 1a). As discussed below, the rather subtle difference in primary sequence between H3.3 and H3.1/2 in this region ('AAIG' vs. 'SAVM') is necessary and sufficient to account for selective deposition and enrichment at specific loci in the genome [3]. In the yeast species S. cerevisiae and S. pombe, all non-centromeric H3 genes encode for an identical H3.3-like protein sequence. Phy-logenetic relationships (Figure 1b) suggest that the metazoan H3.3 and yeast H3 share a common ancestor with conserved functions.
Most higher eukaryotes organize their genes for all four canonical histones H2A, H2B, H3.1/2 and H4 in repeats with a total of 10-50 intronless copies of each histone gene [4,5]. Organisms at the base of the metazoan tree, such as Trichoplax adhearens, have only one or few copies of H3.1/2, arguing for a later expansion of the canonical histone genes (Figure 1c). H3.1/2 transcripts from these clusters lack a poly(A) tail but share a conserved 3' stem loop [6]. These unique features are thought to be responsible for the tight restriction of replication-dependent histone gene expression to S phase [7]. By contrast, H3.3 genes are present in single copies, often contain introns, and give rise to classical polyadenylated mRNAs. Unlike H3.1/2, the expression of H3.3 genes is replication-independent, and H3.3 has long been established as the predominant H3 variant in quiescent, G1, and G2 cells [8]. Consequently, its cell-cycle-independent expression enables H3.3 to serve as a substrate for both replication-dependent deposition and histone replacement processes that occur outside of S phase.
H3.3 is enriched at active genes, promoters, and regulatory elements
The bulk of newly synthesized histones are incorporated during DNA replication. Once assembled into nucleo-somes, the H3/H4 tetramer has been observed to be much
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2010, 20:110-117
This review comes from a themed issue on Chromosomes and expression mechanisms Edited by Renato Paro and Jeannie T. Lee
Available online 12th February 2010
0959-437X/$ - see front matter
# 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
DOI 10.1016/j.gde.2010.01.003
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2010, 20:110-117
www.sciencedirect.com
New functions for an old variant: no substitute for histone H3.3 Elsaesser, Goldberg and Allis 111
Figure 1
Protein sequences and gene complements of the non-centromeric histone H3 variants in fungi and metazoans. (a) Schematic representation of the major non-centromeric histone H3 protein sequences from human, mouse and Trichoplax adhearens (one of the most basal metazoan species), as well as budding and fission yeast. Amino acids that distinguish variants are highlighted with residue numbers, additional differences are indicated as dots. H3.1 only exists in mammals and only differs in position 96 from H3.2 present in all metazoans. H3.2 and H3.3 are distinguished by one amino acid difference at position 31 in the histone tail and three in amino acids 87-90 in the core histone fold. (b) Phylogenetic relationship of the respective histone H3 genes. An unrooted parsimony tree was constructed on the basis of representative coding sequences (consensus tree of 100 bootstraps, excluding the wobble bases). The H3 genes of S. pombe and S. cerevisiae cluster with metazoan H3.3. (c) Schematic overview of the major non-centromeric gene complements of the indicated species. The placozoan Trichoplax adhearens has only one gene for H3.2 and H3.3 each, while higher metazoans have greatly expanded H3.1/2 gene complements.
more stable in chromatin than the H2A/H2B dimers, measured by global levels of displacement during replication and transcription [9]. However, pioneering cyto-logical studies of H3 variant deposition in Drosophila provided evidence for rapid H3/H4 exchange at specific loci in euchromatin [3]. While low levels of H3.3 are deposited together with H3.2 during replication, H3.3 was specifically enriched within actively transcribed genes by a replication-independent replacement process dependent on active transcription [3,10]. Conversion of the H3.3 variant region 87-90 ('AAIG') to the H3.1/2 sequence   'SAVM'  abolished replication-independent
incorporation [3]. These findings underscore the importance of the variant H3.3 sequence in addition to its cell-cycle-independent expression. Interestingly, the single replacement of a 'S' with 'A'' at position 31 of the histone H3 tail did not have any influence on the deposition pathway, suggesting that H3.3 S31 and its phosphoryl-ation do not play a role in H3.3 deposition [11].
Recent advances in chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) technologies have allowed a more detailed map of H3.3 deposition, revealing specific H3.3 incorporation throughout the gene body of transcribed genes as well as
www.sciencedirect.com
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2010, 20:110-117
112  Chromosomes and expression mechanisms
Figure 2
Genomic H3.3 localization and H3.3 deposition pathways. (a) Schematic map of an active and inactive gene locus comprising an upstream regulatory element (RE), transcription start site (Promoter) and transcription end site (TES). The distribution of histone H3.3 across the locus is shown in green, with representative H3.3 and H3.1/2 nucleosomes, as well as RNA polymerase II (RNAP). (b) Summary of the known factors involved in replication-dependent (right, S phase) and replication-independent (left, Interphase) chromatin assembly pathways, in metazoans and yeast. Replication-coupled assembly is thought to be mediated by the CAF-1 complex and Asf1 proteins in the wake of DNA polymerase (DNAP). H3.3-enrichment at telomeres is dependent on ATRX. Replication-independent deposition at promoters, regulatory elements and genic regions in metazoans requires HIRA, CHD1, and/or other factors, analogous to pathways in yeast mediated by Snf2, Asf1, HIR complex and/or Spt6. The FACT complex (Spt16 and Pob3/Ssrp1) might contribute to incorporation of new or recycling of old histones.
highly enriched foci at the promoter region in Drosophila and mammalian cells (Figure 2a) [12-17,18*,19,20**]. H3.3 enrichment at promoter regions has been observed not only at active genes but also at inactive genes, possibly accounting for a 'poised' state of these genes [13,18*]. Furthermore, H3 replacement also occurs at genic and intergenic regulatory regions in various metazoans (Figure 2a) [13,14,20**].
Mechanism of H3.3-specific deposition in metazoans
HIRA, the homolog of yeast Hir1 in higher eukaryotes, has been shown to assemble chromatin independent of
replication and to interact with ASF1a/b in a multi-subunit complex specific for H3.3 [21,22]. HIRA and the SWI/SNF family chromatin remodeler CHD1 have also been implicated in H3.3 deposition in vivo [23]. Globally, H3.3 continues to be incorporated into chro-matinevenintheabsenceofHIRAorCHD1[23,24]. To this end, we have recently found that, while HIRA is required for H3.3 deposition at genic regions in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, H3.3 enrichment at telo-meres and most regulatory elements is HIRA-indepen-dent [25**]. Instead, the SWI/SNF-type chromatin remodeler ATRX mediates localization of H3.3 to telomeres [25**,26].
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2010, 20:110-117
www.sciencedirect.com
New functions for an old variant: no substitute for histone H3.3 Elsaesser, Goldberg and Allis 113
Thus, a number of factors required for proper H3.3 localization at specific genomic regions have now been identified, while the precise mechanisms of H3.3 replacement remain obscure. How are the subtle differences between H3.3 and H3.1/2 interpreted by and translated into to a site-specific deposition? To date, there are no structural details known on the recognition of H3.3. While several H3.3-associated factors have been identified [22], none of them have been shown to directly and specifically bind H3.3.
Mechanism of H3 replacement in yeast
On the basis of the homology in sequence, we expect a common structural theme in chaperones that recognize yeast H3 and metazoan H3.3 in a way that would allow specific discrimination of H3.3-specific sequence features. Despite relying on a single H3.3-like species, both replication-dependent and replication-independent H3 deposition pathways are found in yeast: in S. pombe,H3 expressed outside of S phase is preferentially incorporated in euchromatin [27,28]. A number of studies in S. cerevisiae detected H3 replacement at active [29*] and also inactive [30*,31*] promoters, but only to a small extent throughout transcribed gene bodies. Genetic studies in yeast delineated a pathway comprising the SWI/SNF family chromatin remodeler Snf2 and the histone chaper-one Asfl, as well as Hirl or Spt6 for H3 exchange at the promoter region [31*,32,33,34,35*]. H3 deposition at the gene body required active transcription, Hir1, and Asf1 [30*,31*,36]. Hirl, Hir2, Hir3 and Hpc2 constitute the HIR repressor complex that has been shown to catalyze replication-independent histone deposition together with the H3/H4 chaperone Asf1 in vitro [37,38]. Spt6 has also been shown to facilitate nucleosome assembly in vitro [39]. Therefore, chromatin remodelers, histone chaper-ones and deposition factors cooperate in the eviction of old and deposition of new histones in yeast (Figure 2b). Interestingly, the elongation complex FACT (Spt16/ Pob3) redeposit H3/H4 units in the wake of RNAPII, favoring recycling of 'old' histone over exchanging them with 'new' H3/H4 [40*]. When Spt16 is deleted, a Hir1-dependent pathway takes over to deposits more 'new' H3 [40*,41]. In conclusion, yeast genetics ofreplication-inde-pendent histone exchange processes might yield clues to yet undiscovered components of metazoan H3.3-depo-sition pathways. Moreover, novel pathways for histone exchange might exist uniquely in higher eukaryotes
(Figure 2b).
H3.3 function: a balancing act between facilitating and repressing transcription?
As a highly conserved replacement variant, does H3.3 have a conserved function at promoters, coding regions, and regulatory elements? Two recent studies assessing inducible gene expression suggest that incorporation of H3.3 promotes initial gene activation [18*,42*]. One possibility is that nucleosome eviction and H3.3 depo-
sition may serve as a mechanism for the rapid removal of inhibitory histone posttranslational modifications and/or replacement with activating marks as suggested by others [3]. However, even though nucleosomal H3.3 is enriched in activating modifications such as H3K4me3, these modifications in particular seem to be established only after nucleosomal deposition [43,44]. Rather than introducing a particular set of PTMs, ongoing histone exchange could therefore contribute to a highly dynamic steady state of establishment and removal of histone PTMs at specific genomic locations. Continuous histone exchange and H3.3 incorporation at boundaries of chro-matin domains has therefore been proposed to limiting the spreading of certain histone modifications [13,30*].
On the basis of the apparent lability of H3.3 nucleosomes in chromatin extracts, it has been proposed that nucleo-some-destabilizing properties could help promote and propagate an active chromatin state [20**,45]. As in vitro studies found little stability difference in recombinant H3.1/2 and H3.3 nucleosome [46,47], this effect might be potentiated by histone PTMs or inherent to CG-rich promoter DNA sequences that often coincide with H3.3 enrichment [48*]. Furthermore, cooperative effects with H2A.Z and exclusion of the linker histone H1 could account for some of the properties of H3.3-containing nucleosomes [45,49**].
Is H3.3 a general marker of active chromatin? Notably, the HIR complex has been shown to have a repressive role on transcription in yeast [45,50-52,53*,54]. Hir1 was first identified as a potent repressor of the canonical histone genes in S. cerevisiae [50], and recently its repres-sor function in S. pombe has been mapped to a large number of promoters and also to suppression of cryptic transcripts from within coding regions [53*], probably by repopulating nucleosome-free regions [32]. It is tempting to speculate that replication-independent H3.3 deposition in metazoans is similarly used to replenish nucleo-some-free regions. Indeed, H3.3 knockdown leads to a slight decrease in nucleosome density [49**].
Despite its predominant enrichment in euchromatin, H3.3 might also play significant roles in heterochromatic regions. HIRA, ASF1a and the mammalian Hir2 homolog Ubinuclein-1 have been implicated in the formation of facultative heterochromatin [55,56], and H3.3 has been observed in pericentric heterochromatin and at telomeres
[11,57*].
Biological significance of replication-
independent H3.3 deposition
Clues for the functional significance of H3.3 come from genetic studies in flies and mice. Loss of both genes of H3.3 in flies leads to complete sterility, mild transcriptional defects, particularly at highly expressed genes, and partial but incomplete lethality (^42% viability) [58].
www.sciencedirect.com
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2010, 20:110-117
114  Chromosomes and expression mechanisms
Intriguingly, the grossly normal development to adulthood of the surviving H3.3-deficient flies indicates that H3.3 is not absolutely required for transcription and development [58,59**]. Indeed, while expression of a subset of genes in adults was perturbed, the precisely timed and localized expression of developmental key factors was not affected in H3.3-deficient flies. Similarly, although HIRA is required for fertility, adult HIRA null flies have no phenotypic abnormalities [24]. In mice, targeted mutagenesis of HIRA resulted in gastrulation defects and patterning abnormalities of mesendodermal derivatives before early embryonic lethality [60], suggesting a more prominent role for replication-independent chromatin assembly during mammalian development. Although HIRA may have various H3.3-independent functions, H3.3 itself is also important for mammalian development: a retroviral gene trap insertion into the murine H3.3A gene generated an H3.3 hypo-morph that caused developmental defects and neonatal lethality [61**].
How do flies compensate so well for the loss of H3.3 or HIRA? Intriguingly, an unknown mechanism seems to allow the cells to sense overall histone levels, as replication-dependent histone H3.2 genes are upregulated in H3.3-deficient flies. Furthermore, upregulated endogenous replication-dependent histone gene transcripts were found to be polyadenylated to some extent, probably achieved by a known alternative histone mRNA processing mechanism [58**,62]. Importantly, viability and wildtype expression of most genes are fully restored when an additional H3.2 transgene is introduced [58**]. Thus, elevated levels of H3.2 can largely rescue the transcrip-tional phenotype in adult H3.3 null flies. In rapidly dividing cells, replication-dependent deposition of H3.1/2 could compensate for loss of nucleosomes during transcription (Figure 3a). Alternatively, replication-independent pathways could tolerate H3.1/2 as substrates in the absence of H3.3 (Figure 3b).
Interestingly, global H3K4me3 levels in flies lacking H3.3 were comparable to wild type but drastically reduced in flies with a H3.3K4A transgene [58**], indicating that only in the absence of H3.3, H3.2 becomes the major carrier for this mark. We and others speculate that in the absence of a replacement variant, re-deposition of histones in cis partially substitute for replication-independent incorporation of new histones [63], which is analogous to the competing pathways for 'new' and 'old' histone observed in yeast (Figure 3c)[40*]. Thus, if no 'new' histones are available, more 'old' histones with 'old' marks might be retained.
Histone replacement by H3.3 is essential for reproduction in metazoans
Despite potential compensatory mechanisms, HIRA and H3.3 play crucial roles in sexual reproduction in all
Figure 3
Putative compensatory mechanisms for the loss of H3.3. (a) Absence of H3.3 as substrate for replication-independent chromatin assembly could create nucleosome-free regions (see also ref. [63]). In rapidly dividing cells, these gaps could be filled during the next S phase via canonical replication-dependent chromatin assembly. (b)Elevated levels of H3.1/2 throughout the cell cycle could provide substrate for replication-independent chromatin assembly factors that are not restricted to H3.3. (c)Inthe absenceof de novo chromatin assembly, the FACT complex could favor transient eviction and redeposition of histone units in cis.
(a) Enhanced replication-dependent deposition
(b) Alternative deposition pathways
expression
i i
1 HIRA? i CHD1?
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2010, 20:110-117
www.sciencedirect.com
New functions for an old variant: no substitute for histone H3.3 Elsaesser, Goldberg and Allis 115
studied metazoans [24,58**,59**]. Both male and female H3.3 null flies are sterile. In mammals, the hypomorphic gene trap of H3.3A described above also led to male sub-fertility [61**]. Strikingly, H3.3 is substrate for several large-scale chromatin remodeling events during metazoan reproduction, in particular gametogenesis and fertilization [64*]. Meiotic sex-chromosome inactivation in mammalian male germ cells also involves massive incorporation of H3.3 into the X and Y chromosomes and subsequent silencing [65*], a process that could be mechanistically related to the formation of facultative heterochromatin [55,56].
Meiosis is partly impaired in H3.3 null flies owing to a defect in chromosome segregation [58**]. After meiosis, the condensation of sperm chromatin requires removal of most histones and replacement with protamines, although some pool of H3.3 is retained in mammalian and C. elegans sperm chromatin [65*,66]. After fertilization, a maternal pool of H3.3 is used to rechromatinize the paternal genome in the male pronucleus [23,24,66,67]. This asymmetrical distribution of H3 variants could be important in epigenetic distinction of maternal and paternal information.
Critically, all remodeling events in the germline seem to be exquisitely specific to H3.3, as a H3.2 transgene under the H3.3 promoter cannot rescue the fly's sterility [59**]. It is therefore likely that the phenotype is a direct consequence of impaired large-scale chromatin remodeling rather than a secondary effect due to gene expression changes related to transcriptional defects in the absence of H3.3. Consistent with this notion, H3.3 incorporation in the male pronucleus precedes onset of transcription and relies on HIRA and CHD1 activity [23,24]. The essential germline functions of H3.3 therefore probably created the strong evolutionary pressure that drove the exceptional conservation of the H3.3 protein in higher eukaryotes.
Conclusions
Why is the use of H3.3 so diverse and widespread while not all of its functions are essential in metazoans? We speculate that both germline and somatic functions of H3.3 have evolved from the single H3.3-like ancestor present in unicellular organisms. Differential timing of H3 gene expression might have allowed some tailoring of H3 variants for replication-dependent and independent functions, but ultimately the diversification of H3.1/2 amino acid sequence efficiently excluded these replication-dependent histones from H3.3-specific pathways. The separation of replication-dependent and replication-independent pools of H3/H4 might have allowed subsequent multiplication of the replication-dependent histone genes to fuel the growing need for bulk histones during replication of larger genomes without affecting fine-tuned histone replacement processes. We will need
more detailed studies on how these H3.3-specific pathways affect chromatin structure and function to ultimately understand why metazoans evolved this exquisite specificity. Interestingly, H3 variants similar to H3.1/2 and H3.3 have emerged by convergent evolution in plants, multicellular fungi and even the protozoans Tetrahymena and Trypanosoma brucei [68,69], suggesting a universal theme in chromatin regulation by histone variants.
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the Allis laboratory for critical reading and discussions. SJE is supported by the David Rockefeller Graduate Program and the Boehringer Ingelheim Funds; ADG is supported by NIH MSTP grant GM07739; CDA acknowledges support from the NIH and The Rockefeller University.
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest of outstanding interest
1. Franklin SG, Zweidler A: Non-allelic variants of histones 2a, 2b and 3 in mammals. Nature 1977, 266:273-275.
2. Palmer DK, O'Day K, Wener MH, Andrews BS, Margolis RL: A17-kD centromere protein (CENP-A) copurifies with nucleosome core particles and with histones. J Cell Biol 1987, 104:805-815.
3. Ahmad K, Henikoff S: The histone variant H3.3 marks active chromatin by replication-independent nucleosome assembly.
MolCell 2002, 9:1191-1200.
4. Marzluff WF, Gongidi P, Woods KR, Jin J, Maltais LJ: The human and mouse replication-dependent histone genes. Genomics 2002, 80:487-498.
5. Rooney AP, Piontkivska H, Nei M: Molecular evolution of the nontandemly repeated genes of the histone 3 multigene family. Mol Biol Evol 2002, 19:68-75.
6. Dominski Z, Marzluff WF: Formation of the 3' end of histone mRNA. Gene 1999, 239:1-14.
7. Harris ME, Bohni R, Schneiderman MH, Ramamurthy L, Schumperli D, Marzluff WF: Regulation of histone mRNA in the unperturbed cell cycle: evidence suggesting control at two posttranscriptional steps. Mol Cell Biol 1991, 11:2416-2424.
8. Wu RS, Tsai S, Bonner WM: Patterns of histone variant synthesis can distinguish G0 from G1 cells. Cell 1982,
31 :367-374.
9. Kimura H: Histone dynamics in living cells revealed by photobleaching. DNA Rep (Amst) 2005, 4:939-950.
10. Schwartz BE, Ahmad K: Transcriptional activation triggers deposition and removal of the histone variant H3.3. Genes Dev 2005, 19:804-814.
11. Hake SB, Garcia BA, Kauer M, Baker SP, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, Allis CD: Serine 31 phosphorylation of histone variant H3.3 is specific to regions bordering centromeres in metaphase chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:6344-6349.
12. Wirbelauer C, Bell O, SchiJbeler D: Variant histone H3.3 is deposited at sites of nucleosomal displacement throughout transcribed genes while active histone modifications show a promoter-proximal bias. Genes Dev 2005, 19:1761-1766.
13. Mito Y, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S: Histone replacement marks the boundaries of cis-regulatory domains. Science 2007, 315:1408-1411.
14. Nakayama T, Nishioka K, Dong Y-X, Shimojima T, Hirose S: Drosophila GAGA factor directs histone H3.3 replacement that prevents the heterochromatin spreading. Genes Dev 2007,
21 :552-561.
www.sciencedirect.com
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2010, 20:110-117
116  Chromosomes and expression mechanisms
15. Janicki SM, Tsukamoto T, Salghetti SE, Tansey WP, Sachidanandam R, Prasanth KV, Ried T, Shav-Tal Y, Bertrand E, Singer RH et al.: From silencing to gene expression: real-time analysis in single cells. Cell 2004, 116:683-698.
16. Daury L, Chailleux C, Bonvallet J, Trouche D: Histone H3.3 deposition at E2F-regulated genes is linked to transcription.
EMBO Rep 2006, 7:66-71.
17. Chow C-M, Georgiou A, Szutorisz H, Maia e Silva A, Pombo A, Barahona I, Dargelos E, Canzonetta C, Dillon N: Variant histone H3.3 marks promoters of transcriptionally active genes during mammalian cell division. EMBO Rep 2005, 6:354-360.
18. Tamura T, Smith M, Kanno T, Dasenbrock H, Nishiyama A, •    Ozato K: Inducible deposition of the histone variant H3.3
in interferon-stimulated genes. J Biol Chem 2009, 284:12217-12225.
The eight IFN response genes studied are constitutively enriched in H3.3 at their promoter region. IFN stimulates expression and incorporation of H3.3 in the gene body. Interestingly, H3.3 knockdown attenuates induction of these genes.
19. Sutcliffe EL, Parish IA, He YQ, Juelich T, Tierney ML, Rangasamy D, Milburn PJ, Parish CR, Tremethick DJ, Rao S: Dynamic histone variant exchange accompanies gene induction in T cells. Mol Cell Biol 2009, 29:1972-1986.
20. Jin C, Zang C, Wei G, Cui K, Peng W, Zhao K, Felsenfeld G: H3.3/ H2A.Z double variant-containing nucleosomes mark 'nucleosome-free regions' of active promoters and other regulatory regions. Nat Genet 2009, 41:941-945.
This careful analysis of nucleosome occupancy at promoters regions by ChIP-Seq suggests that previously reported 'nucleosome-free' regions harbor, at least transiently, nucleosomes containing both H3.3 and H2A.Z histone variants.
21. Ray-Gallet D, Quivy J-P, Scamps C, Martini EM-D, Lipinski M, Almouzni G: HIRA is critical for a nucleosome assembly pathway independent of DNA synthesis. Mol Cell 2002, 9:1091-1100.
22. Tagami H, Ray-Gallet D, Almouzni G, Nakatani Y: Histone H3.1 and H3.3 complexes mediate nucleosome assembly pathways dependent or independent of DNA synthesis. Cell 2004, 116:51-61.
23. Konev AY, Tribus M, ParkSY, Podhraski V, Lim CY, Emelyanov AV, Vershilova E, Pirrotta V, Kadonaga JT, Lusser A etal.: CHD1 motor protein is required for deposition of histone variant H3.3 into chromatin in vivo. Science 2007, 317:1087-1090.
24. Bonnefoy E, Orsi GA, Couble P, Loppin B: The essential role of Drosophila HIRA for de novo assembly of paternal chromatin at fertilization. PLoS Genet 2007, 3:1991-2006.
25. Goldberg AG, Banaszynski LA, Noh KM, Lewis PW, Elsaesser SJ, Stadler S, Dewell S, Law S, Guo X, Li X et al.: Distinct factors control histone variant H3.3 localization at specific genomic regions. Cell 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.003.
This work provides genome-wide profiles of H3.3 localization in mouse ES and neuronal precursor cells using ChIP-seq. Surprisingly, HIRA is responsible for H3.3 localization at active and repressed genes, but not telomeres and most regulatory elements. ATRX (alpha thalassemia and X-linked mental retardation) specifically associates with H3.3 and is required for HIRA-independent localization of H3.3 at telomeres and for repression of telomeric repeat-containing RNA.
26. Wong LH, McGhie JD, Sim M, Anderson MA, Ahn S, Hannan RD, George AJ, Morgan KA, Mann JR, Choo KHA: ATRX interacts with H3.3 in maintaining telomere structural integrity in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Genome Res 2010 doi: 10.1101/gr.101477.109.
27. Choi ES, Shin JA, Kim HS, Jang YK: Dynamic regulation of replication independent deposition of histone H3 in fission yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:7102-7110.
30. Dion MF, Kaplan T, Kim M, Buratowski S, Friedman N, Rando OJ:
• Dynamics of replication-Independent histone turnover In budding yeast. Science 2007, 315:1405-1408.
See annotation in Ref. [31T.
31. Rufiange A, Jacques P-E, Bhat W, Robert F, Nourani A: Genome-
• wide replication-independent histone H3 exchange occurs predominantly at promoters and implicates H3 K56 acetylation and Asfl. Mol Cell 2007, 27:393-405.
Ref. [29^-311 report genome-wide maps of replication-independent histone dynamics in yeast, resembling patterns of H3.3 incorporation in metazoans.
32. Schermer UJ, Korber P, Horz W: Histones are incorporated in trans during reassembly of the yeast PHO5 promoter. Mol Cell 2005, 19:279-285.
33. Gkikopoulos T, Havas KM, Dewar H, Owen-Hughes T: SWI/SNF and Asf1p cooperate to displace histones during induction of the saccharomyces cerevisiae HO promoter. Mol Cell Biol 2009, 29:4057-4066.
34. Adkins MW, Tyler JK: The histone chaperone Asflp mediates global chromatin disassembly in vivo. J Biol Chem 2004,
279:52069-52074.
35. Adkins MW, Tyler JK: Transcriptional activators are
• dispensable fortranscription in the absence of Spt6-mediated chromatin reassembly of promoter regions. Mol Cell 2006, 21:405-416.
This study shows that chromatin reassembly at yeast promoter regions is essential for basal repression of transcriptional activity. In contrast to ref. [28], the authors find Spt6 but not Hir1 to be essential for histone deposition at the promoter.
36. Kim H-J, Seol J-H, Cho E-J: Potential role of the histone chaperone, CAF-1, in transcription. BMBRep 2009,42:227-231.
37. Prochasson P, Florens L, Swanson SK, Washburn MP, Workman JL: The HIR corepressor complex binds to nucleosomes generating a distinct protein/DNA complex resistant to remodeling by SWI/SNF. Genes Dev 2005, 19:2534-2539.
38. Green EM, Antczak AJ, Bailey AO, Franco AA, Wu KJ, Yates JR, Kaufman PD: Replication-independent histone deposition by the HIR complex and Asf1. Curr Biol 2005, 15:2044-2049.
39. Bortvin A, Winston F: Evidence that Spt6p controls chromatin structure by a direct interaction with histones. Science 1996, 272:1473-1476.
40. Jamai A, Puglisi A, Strubin M: Histone chaperone Spt16
• promotes redeposition of the original H3-H4 histones evicted by elongating RNA polymerase. Mol Cell 2009, 35:377-383.
This study suggest existence of competing pathways for chromatin reassembly in the wake RNA polymerase--in the presence of Spt16, 'old' histones are redeposited after RNA polymerase passage, while in its absence newly synthesized histones are preferably incorporated.
41. Formosa T, Ruone S, Adams MD, Olsen AE, Eriksson P, Yu Y, Rhoades AR, Kaufman PD, Stillman DJ: Defects in SPT16 or POB3 (yFACT) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cause dependence on the Hir/Hpc pathway: polymerase passage may degrade chromatin structure. Genetics 2002,
162:1557-1571.
42. Placek B, Huang J, Kent J, Dorsey J, Rice L, Fraser N, Berger S:
• The histone variant H3.3 regulates gene expression during lytic infection by Herpes Simplex Virus, HSV-1. J Virol 2008.
Example of HIRA-dependent replication-independent H3.3-deposition in vivo. H3.3 is rapidly incorporated into the viral genome in infected cells independent of replication. HIRA knockdown reduces H3.3 occupancy and expression levels of viral genes.
43. McKittrick E, Gafken PR, Ahmad K, Henikoff S: Histone H3.3 is enriched in covalent modifications associated with active chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:1525-1530.
28. Takayama Y, Takahashi K: Differential regulation of repeated histone genes during the fission yeast cell cycle. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35:3223-3237.
29. Jamai A, Imoberdorf RM, Strubin M: Continuous histone H2B •    and transcription-dependent histone H3 exchange in yeast
cells outside of replication. Mol Cell 2007, 25:345-355. See annotation in Ref. [311.
44. Loyola A, Bonaldi T, Roche D, Imhof A, Almouzni G: PTMs on H3 variants before chromatin assembly potentiate their final epigenetic state. Mol Cell 2006, 24:309-316.
45. Kim H-J, Seol J-H, Han J-W, Youn H-D, Cho E-J: Histone
chaperones regulate histone exchange during transcription.
EMBO J 2007, 26:4467-4474.
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2010, 20:110-117
www.sciencedirect.com
New functions for an old variant: no substitute for histone H3.3 Elsaesser, Goldberg and Allis 117
46. Flaus A, Rencurel C, Ferreira H, Wiechens N, Owen-Hughes T: Sin mutations alter inherent nucleosome mobility. EMBO J 2004, 23:343-353.
47. Thakar A, Gupta P, Ishibashi T, Finn R, Silva-Moreno B, Uchiyama S, Fukui K, Tomschik M, Ausio J, Zlatanova J: H2A.Z and H3.3 histone variants affect nucleosome structure: biochemical and biophysical studies. Biochemistry 2009, 48:10852-10857.
48. Ramirez-Carrozzi VR, Braas D, Bhatt DM, Cheng CS, Hong C,
• Doty KR, Black JC, Hoffmann A, Carey M, Smale ST: A unifying model for the selective regulation of inducible transcription by CpG islands and nucleosome remodeling. Cell 2009, 138:114-128.
This study suggests that high CpG content at promoter DNA sequences intrinsically disfavors formation of nucleosomes.
49. Braunschweig U, Hogan G, Pagie L, van Steensel B: Histone H1 ••   binding is inhibited by histone variant H3.3. EMBO J 2009. This study shows a general inverse correlation of H1 occupancy and H3.3 enrichment and a globally reduced nucleosome density upon H3.3 knockdown.
50. Sherwood PW, Tsang SV, Osley MA: Characterization of HIR1 and HIR2, two genes required for regulation of histone gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1993,
13:28-38.
51. Sharp JA, Fouts ET, Krawitz DC, Kaufman PD: Yeast histone deposition protein Asf1p requires Hir proteins and PCNA for heterochromatic silencing. Curr Biol 2001, 11:463-473.
52. Blackwell C, Martin KA, Greenall A, Pidoux A, Allshire RC, Whitehall SK: The Schizosaccharomyces pombe HIRA-like protein Hip1 is required for the periodic expression of histone genes and contributes to the function of complex centromeres. Mol Cell Biol 2004, 24:4309-4320.
53. Anderson H, Wardle J, Korkut S, Murton H, Lopez-Maury L,
• Bahler J, Whitehall S: The fission yeast HIRA histone chaperone is required for promoter silencing and the suppression of cryptic antisense transcripts. Mol Cell Biol 2009.
This study shows that the S. pombe Hira homologs act as global transcriptional repressors, genes and cryptic transcripts. Its function in establishing repressive chromatin structure also contributes to genome stability.
54. Fillingham J, Kainth P, Lambert J-P, Bakel Hv, Tsui K, Pena-Castillo L, NislowC, Figeys D, HughesTR, Greenblatt J etal.: Two-color cell array screen reveals interdependent roles for histone chaperones and a chromatin boundary regulator in histone gene repression. Mol Cell 2009, 35:340-351.
55. Zhang R, Chen W, Adams PD: Molecular dissection of formation of senescence-associated heterochromatin foci. Mol Cell Biol 2007, 27:2343-2358.
56. Banumathy G, Somaiah N, Zhang R, Tang Y, Hoffmann J, Andrake M, Ceulemans H, Schultz D, Marmorstein R, Adams P: Human UBN1 is an ortholog of yeast Hpc2p and has an essential role in the HIRA/ASF1a chromatin-remodeling pathway in senescent cells. Mol Cell Biol 2009, 29:758-770.
57. Wong L, Ren H, Williams E, McGhie J, Ahn S, Sim M, Tam A,
• Earle E, Anderson M, Mann J et al.: Histone H3.3 incorporation provides a unique and functionally essential telomeric chromatin in embryonic stem cells. Genome Res 2009.
This study identifies H3.3 as essential part of a emryonic stem cell-specific telomeric chromatin.
58. Sakai A, Schwartz BE, Goldstein S, Ahmad K: Transcriptional and ••   developmental functions of the H3.3 histone variant in
Drosophila. Curr Biol 2009:1-5. This detailed study of H3.3-deficient flies reports partial lethality, sterility and some transcriptional defects in adult flies. The authors provide
evidence that loss of H3.3 is partly compensated by increased expression of H3.2. They further show that H3.3 is required for faithful chromosome segregation in meiosis of male germ cells. While variant residues 87-90 of H3.3 are essential, H3.3 S31, K4 and K9 do not seem to play a role in this process.
59. Hodl M, Basler K: Transcription in the absence of histone H3.3.
Curr Biol 2009:1-6. First genetic assessment of H3.3 function. Flies showed normal development in the absence of H3.3 but were sterile. Spatial and temporal expression of key developmental factors was not affected by H3.3 deletion. However, both male and female germline development absolutely required H3.3, as H3.2 transgene expression could not rescue sterility.
60. Roberts C, Sutherland HF, Farmer H, Kimber W, Halford S, Carey A, Brickman JM, Wynshaw-Boris A, Scambler PJ: Targeted mutagenesis of the Hira gene results in gastrulation defects and patterning abnormalities of mesoendodermal derivatives prior to early embryonic lethality. Mol Cell Biol 2002, 22:2318-2328.
61. Couldrey C, Carlton MB, Nolan PM, Colledge WH, Evans MJ: A ••   retroviral genetrap insertion intothehistone3.3Agenecauses
partial neonatal lethality, stunted growth, neuromuscular deficits and male sub-fertility in transgenic mice. Hum Mol
Genet 1999, 8:2489-2495.
A gene trap insertion in the H3.3A locus of mice provides evidence for essential developmental and germline function of H3.3 in mice. The hypomorphic insertion leads to a strong reduction of H3.3A mRNA expression accompanied by partial lethality, developmental defects and male sterility.
62. Akhmanova A, Miedema K, Kremer H, Hennig W: Two types of polyadenated mRNAs are synthesized from Drosophila replication-dependent histone genes. Eur J Biochem 1997,
244:294-300.
63. Bell O, Schubeler D: Chromatin: sub out the replacement. Curr Biol 2009, 19:R545-547.
64. Orsi GA, Couble P, Loppin B: Epigenetic and replacementroles
• of histone variant H3.3 in reproduction and development. Int J
Dev Biol 2009, 53:231-243. An in-depth review of H3.3 functions in the germline of various metazo-ans.
65. van der Heijden GW, Derijck AA, Posfai E, Giele M, Pelczar P,
• Ramos L, Wansink DG, van der Vlag J, Peters AH, de Boer P: Chromosome-wide nucleosome replacement and H3.3 incorporation during mammalian meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Nat Genet 2007, 39:251-258.
This study reveals large-scale incorporation of H3.3 during transcriptional silencing and condensation of the sex chromosomes preceding meiosis and provides first evidence for a role of H3.3 in mammalian germline chromatin dynamics.
66. Ooi SL, Priess JR, Henikoff S: Histone H3.3 variant dynamics in the germline of Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet 2006,
2:e97.
67. Torres-Padilla M-E, Bannister AJ, Hurd PJ, Kouzarides T, Zernicka-Goetz M: Dynamic distribution of the replacement histone variant H3.3 in the mouse oocyte and preimplantation embryos. Int J Dev Biol 2006, 50:455-461.
68. Allis CD, Glover CV, Bowen JK, Gorovsky MA: Histone variants specific to the transcriptionally active, amitotically dividing macronucleus of the unicellular eucaryote, Tetrahymena thermophila. Cell 1980, 20:609-617.
69. Siegel TN, Hekstra DR, Kemp LE, Figueiredo LM, Lowell JE, Fenyo D, Wang X, Dewell S, Cross GAM: Four histone variants mark the boundaries of polycistronic transcription units in Trypanosoma brucei. Genes Dev 2009:1-15.
www.sciencedirect.com
Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2010, 20:110-117