Persistent organic pollutants - sample analysis Jana Klánová klanova@recetox.muni.cz 1. Environmental analytical chemistry Specific features, general scheme 2. Sampling Sampling plan, strategy, sampling protocol, sample size and quality, transport, storage 3. Sample preparation Extraction of solid (Soxhlet, automatic extraction, MAE, ASE, SFE) and liquid (L-L, SPE, SPME, head-space) samples, fractionation and clean-up (column chromatography, gel permeation) 4. Analytical techniques Chromatographic techniques, principals, instrumentation, HPLC, GC, GC-MS 5. Persistent organic pollutants Priority pollutants (PCBs, PCDDs/Fs, PAHs, pesticides), emerging pollutants (SCCPs/MCCPs, antibiotics, degradation products) 6. QA/QC Calibration, limit of detection and quantification, internal and recovery standards, blanks, certified reference materials, interlaboratory calibration tests, method validation and verification, GLP Environmental science brings together scientists from many fields to perform complex studies of various environmental compartments, processes, and interactions. They may include: - water and food quality monitoring - level of contamination of environmental compartments - ozone depletition as a result of the presence of certain chemicals in the atmosphere - regional contamination studies - evaluation of the impact of local sources of pollution - toxicity of chemical compounds as a function of their chemical structure - impact of chemical substances on living organisms - bioavailability - bioaccumulation - biotic and abiotic transformations - transport of pollutants in the environment - global fate of pollutants - international directives and their impact on the global contamination - remediation actions and their quality control - sustainable development Most of them involve the chemical analysis as one of necessary steps. Environmental analytical chemistry chalenges: - international conventions focus attention on the new groups of pollutants - old contamination brings the problem of residue analyses - lowering limits as well as environmental levels require low detection limits - large-scale monitoring is crutial for the studies of the long-range transport - development of new sampling techniques is encouraged - increasing number of samples stresses the need for automatization - fate studies require understanding of distribution processes and equilibria - photochemical reaction complicate the sampling and data interpretation - consideration of both, analytical and toxicological data is important for successful risk assessment - methods of biochemistry and molecular-biology are often implemented in toxicological studies - international studies require standardization of all procedures There are several steps necessary for environmental contamination control: - problem definition - screening of the situation, data interpretation - evaluation of the extent of the problem - selection of the best procedure to monitor the situation - evaluation of the present state and future development - exposure evaluation and risk assessment - suggestion of correcting measures or remediation activities - new directives to control the situation - monitoring designed to evaluate effectiveness of measures Košetice alfa-HCH beta-HCH gama-HCH delta-HCH Košetice 16.2.-15.3.2004 15.3.-13.4.2004 13.4.-11.5.2004 11.5.-8.6.2004 8.6.-7.7.2004 Specific problems of environmental analysis - low homogenity of samples (soil) - low stability of samples (biota) - various matrices (methods for extraction of analytes from matrices) - wide range of analytes (method development) - wide range of concentration (robust methods) - monitoring on the levels close to the detection limits (high deviations) - risk of secondary contamination - price of ultra-trace analysis (instrumentation, chemicals, standards) General scheme of environmental analysis - Sampling - homogenization - conservation - transport - storage - Sample preparation - extraction - clean-up - selective elution - concentration - derivatization - Sample analysis - Data interpretation Sampling – documentation required - sampling plan (a goal, selection of sampling sites, analytes, sampling method, number of samples, sampling period and frequency, safety procedures), seeks the balance between the value of data and its price - standard operational procedure for sampling various matrices (sampling devices, steps involved in collecting of representative sample -homogenous, of reasonable size and stability, quality of transport and storage) -sampling protocols (name and number of the sample, sampling site, matrix, date of sampling, local conditions and measurements, methods, sample size, responsible person) GPS: 49°29’48’’ 17°57’14’’ 245 m Local conditions: Sampling site 1. DEZA Polyurethane Foam Filter PUF Air Pump Sampling Techniques High-Volume sampler Particulate Phase Gas Phase Glass Fiber Filter GFF Particles Gas Passive sampling Can environmental concentrations of pollutants be calculated from the analyte levels accumulated in an integrative passive sampler? - Calibration conditions should approximate field conditions - Performance Reference Compounds Calibration of a passive sampler in a flow-through system Peristaltic pump 30 ml/min Peristaltic pump 100 l/min Exposure tank Water waste water Stirrer Chemicals in MeOH Water reservoir overheadstirrer Samplers Analytes In MeOH B. Vrana, R. Greenwood, G. Mills 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 AcenaphtheneFluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benz[a]anthraceneC hrysene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene D ibenz[a.h]anthracene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 70 rpm 40 rpm no sampler stirring Rs[L/d] Sampling rates of PAHs B. Vrana, R. Greenwood, G. Mills PRCs are non-interfering compounds added to the sampler prior to exposure. They are used for in situ calibration approach, where the rate of PRC loss during an exposure is related to the target compound uptake. This is accomplished by measuring PRC loss rates during calibration studies and field exposures. Performance reference compounds 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 no stirring 40 rpm 70 rpm Time (h) c(t)/c(0) PRC = D10-Biphenyl Temperature = 11°C Use of performance reference compounds B. Vrana, R. Greenwood, G. Mills Preparation of the sample before extraction Soil samples - lyofilization or air-drying - sieving (< 2mm) and homogenization - appropriate storage (protected from sunlight, heat and humidity) Sediment samples - stone and water removal, lyofilization or air-drying - grating and sieving (<63um), homogenization - powder copper treatment for sulphur removal Plant samples - lyofilization or air-drying - grating, homogenization Animal samples - lyofilization or - homogenization of a wet sample with sodium sulphate Extraction and clean-up The goal: transfer of analytes to the chemical phase suitable for analysis, removal of interferences and pre-concentration of the sample. Extraction techniques: - solvent extraction (Soxhlet, automatic Soxtec, MAE, ASE, SFE) - liquid-liquid extraction - solid phase extraction and microextraction (SPE, SPME) - semipermeable membrane separation - head space analysis Clean-up techniques - sulphuric acid treatment - column liquid chromatography (silica gel, alumina, florisil) - gel permeation chromatography Solid sample extraction Liquid sample extraction Air samples - filters from high volume samplers or passive samplers are extracted as solid samples (Soxhlet, MAE, ASE, SFE) Water samples - direct analysis of the samples with high concentration of pollutants - head space, SPE, L-L Soil and sediment samples - Soxhlet, MAE, ASE, SFE - powder copper treatment for the sulphur removal in sediment samples Biotic samples - high molecular compounds removal by gel permeation chromatography and column chromatography Presence Availability Activity Total mass Fraction of total mass Measure that drives diffusion and partitioning How much is there? How much is available for ... ? How high is the diffusive pressure into other media? Exhaustive Extraction Depletive Extraction/ Sampling Equilibrium Sampling Devices P. Mayer, F. Reichenberg Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE) High pressure CO2 (100 to 400 bar, 40 to 150 oC) is pumped through a sample, and extracted analytes are collected in a suitable solvent for GC analysis. Why to use supercritical carbon dioxide? - CO2 is a lipophilic solvent much like biological lipids in polarity - PAH solubilities in CO2 are proportional to those in water, but ca. 104 higher - pressure and temperature gradients enable the extraction of both, non-polar and polar compounds - mild SFE can be used to predict bioavailability of compounds Earthworm Mortality Depends on Available PAHs (measured by SFE), not on Total PAH Concentrations Soil Total PAH Available Available Total Mortality (ug/g soil) Fraction (SFE) PAH (ug/g C) % Mortality CG15 1020 0.25 1040 0 OG14 168 0.46 2720 0 CG11 15600 0.06 3280 0 CG12 3790 0.16 7880 0 OG17 17200 0.27 9720 0 OG5 1870 0.41 11100 0 OG10 42100 0.33 16300 0 CG3 4100 0.83 45700 100 OG18 17300 0.74 50100 100 S. B. Hawthorne, C. B. Grabanski, D. J. Miller Sam pling train Rinsing of sampling device Extraction Concentration Silica Silica + H2SO4 Silica Silica + NaOH Silica Silica + AgNO3 Sampling standards Extraction standards Basic Alumina Super I column Active carbon column Concentration GC/MS Syringe standards Flow chart of a clean-up procedure for stack emission samples A. Kočan, Slovak Medical University Priority pollutants - polychlorinated biphenyls - polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and furans - organochlorinated pesticides and their metabolites - polyaromatic hydrocarbons - aromatics and nitro-aromatics - chlorinated benzenes - fenol and chlorinated fenols - halogenated alkans Polychlorinated biphenyls ClyClx - sulphuric acid treatment - silica gel column chromatography - activated carbon for non-ortho PCBs - GC-ECD, GC-MS, GC- HRMS Organochlorinated pesticides HCH p,p’-DDT p,p’-DDD p,p’-DDE (DDT, HCH, hexachlorobenzene, toxaphene, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, endosulfane, chlordane) - analytical procedures similar to PCBs for toxaphene, - sulphuric acid has to be omitted for aldrin or endosulfane - GC-MS, NCI-MS, HRMS - for HCHs and DDTs analytical procedures similar to PCBs - GC-ECD, GC-MS, NCI-MS, HRMS Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans - combined modified silica gel clean-up - fractionation on alumina/florisil column - non-ortho PCBs separation on activated carbon column - HRGC-HRMS - kapilary columns 50-60m (DB-5, DB-17, DB-DIOXIN) - EI, NCI - SIM - MS-MS Polyaromatic hydrocarbons - silica gel column chromatography - GC-MS, FLD-HPLC Sample analysis Chromatographic separation (GC, HPLC) is the most common technique for the analysis of environmental samples. It is a physical method based on the distribution of compounds between two phases (stationary and mobile). Process of continuous sorption and desorption of compounds in contact with the stationary phase is responsible for different migration times and for separation of analytes. Two dimensional (GC-GC) and two modal (HPLC-GC) chromatography provide even more sofisticated tools for environmental analysis GC-MS, HPLC-MS and HRMS enable the trace and ultra-trace analysis GC separation:  Non-polar stationary phase (e.g. DB-5) – used for the samples of animal origin and higher chlorinated congeners  Polar phase (e.g. SP-2330) – used for environmental samples (good separation but shorter lifetime)  Splitless, on-column or large-volume injection  Direct connection of the column to the ion source out of splitless injector to mass spectrometer A. Kočan, Slovak Medical University Chromatogram Ion Source Mass Analyzer Ion Detector Vacuum Pumps Inlet Sample Introduction Data System Data Output Mass Spectrometer • All the MS systems compose of the following parts: Ionization, separation of ions and their detection take place in vacuum (~ 10-4 – 10-6 Pa) •Electron multiplier •Photomultiplier •Microchannel plate •Magnetic-sector •Quadrupole •Ion trap •Time-of-flight •Ion-cyclotron resonance •Electron impact (EI) •Chemical ionization (CI) •Electrospray (ESI) •Fast-atom bombardment (FAB) •Laser ionization (LIMS) •Resonance ionization (RIMS) •ˇThermal ionization (TIMS) •Plasma-desorption ionization (PD) •Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) •GC •LC •Direct inlet A. Kočan, Slovak Medical University Electron Impact Ionization Source ~70 Volts + _ + _ e- e-e++ +++ + _ Electron Collector (Trap) Repeller Extraction Plate Filament to Analyzer Inlet Electrons Neutral Molecules Positive Ions 10 to 20 eV out of those 70 eV are transferred to the molecules during the ionization process; Since ~ 10 eV are enough to ionize most organic molecules the excess energy leads to extensive fragmentation; Hence EI is classified as a „hard“ ionization technique The fragmentation gives structural information A. Kočan, Slovak Medical University Detector Ion Source + _ _ DC and AC Voltages resonant ion non-resonant ion + Quadrupole Mass Filter • Consists of 4 parallel metal rods. • Two opposite rods have an applied potential combined from DC and AC voltages. • A mass spectrum is obtained by monitoring the ions passing through the quadrupole filter as the voltages or frequency on the • For given dc and ac voltages, only ions of a certain mass-to-charge ratio pass through the filter and all other ions are thrown out of their original path. • The voltages affect the trajectory of ions traveling down the flight path centered between the rods. Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry • The advantages of the ion-trap mass spectrometer include compact size, and the ability to trap and accumulate ions to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of a measurement. Wolfgang Paul 1989 Nobel Price for Physics „for the development of the ion trap technique“ • This technique can be used easily in the MS/MS (MSn ) mode • The ion-trap analyzer consists of 3 electrodes with hyperbolic surfaces to trap ions in a small volume – the central ring electrode and 2 adjacent endcap electrodes. A mass spectrum is obtained by changing the electrode voltages to eject the ions from the trap. A. Kočan, Slovak Medical University Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (TOFMS) • It uses differences in transit time through a drift region to separate ions of different masses • It operates in a pulsed mode so ions must be produced or extracted in pulses • An electric field accelerates all ions into a field-free drift region with the same initial kinetic energy for all the ions produced • Since the ion kinetic energy is 0.5mv2, lighter ions have a higher velocity than heavier ions and reach the detector sooner (e.g., ions of m/z 500 arrive in ~ 15 s and m/z 50 in ~ 4.6 s • By TOF-MS, up to 50000 full spectra can be measured in a second • Since full spectra are available, peak deconvolution software enabling to differentiate non-separated GC peaks may be applied • The TOF ultra-fast scanning is suitable for fast GC where peak widths can be much less then a second A. Kočan, Slovak Medical University ion trajectory not in register (too heavy) Ion Source Detector ion trajectory not in register (too light) ion trajectory in register S N Electromagnet Magnetic Sector Mass Analyzer Mass spectra What is the SCAN Mode in Mass Spectrometry ? • The scanning mode provides mass spectra. They are recorded (scanned) at regular intervals (typically 0.5 – 1 /s; much faster if TOFMS is used) during the GC separation and stored in the instrument data system for subsequent qualitative or quantitative evaluation. • From mass spectra, it is often possible to deduce structural features (mass spectral interpretation) but this requires experience and can be very timeconsuming, particularly as a complex mixture might contain hundreds of components. • The spectra can also be compared with those stored in mass spectral libraries. Although library searching is a very useful and timesaving technique, it is important to remember that such searches do not identify compounds – analysts do! A. Kočan, Slovak Medical University What is the SIM (or MID) Mode in Mass Spectrometry ? • SIM (Selected Ion Monitoring) or MID (Multiple Ion Detection) is much more sensitive technique suitable for trace quantitative analysis. Here, instead of scanning a whole spectrum, only a few ions (generally, the most abundant but characteristic selected from the mass spectrum) are detected during the GC run. • This can result in as much as a 500-fold increase in sensitivity, at the expense of selectivity. Depending on the analyte, low picogram to even low femtogram amounts can be measured using this powerful technique. • Stable isotope-labeled internal standards can be employed. HRMS/LRMS-SIM chromatogram from the analysis of 2378-TCDD in a soil extract by the isotope dilution method 2,3,7,8-TCDD 13 C12-2,3,7,8-TCDD M+. A=1392 (82%) m/z 319.9 m/z 321.9 m/z 323.9 [M+2]+. A=1688 (100 %) [M+4]+. A=829 (49%) M+. A=1936 (80%) m/z 331.9 m/z 333.9 m/z 335.9 [M+2]+. A=2415 (100%) [M+4]+. A=1198 (50%) A. Kočan, Slovak Medical University • In general, more ions have the same nominal mass • To distinguish between them certain MS resolution is needed • For example, to separate these 2 ions we need a resolution of 5124 R = 122 / (122.060585 – 122.036776) = 5 124 A. Kočan, Slovak Medical University • This conversion is based on the assumption that all the 2,3,7,8-substituted PCDDs and PCDFs (17 cong.), as well as the dioxin-like PCBs (12 cong.), bind to the same receptor, the Ah receptor, and show comparable qualitative (toxic) effects, but with different potencies TEQ = (PCDDi × TEFi) + (PCDFi × TEFi ) + (PCBi × TEFi ) Conversion of Analytical Results into the Toxic Equivalent (TEQ) • These differences in toxicity are expressed in the toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) • TEF of the most toxic 2378-TCDD = 1 Congener I-TEF WHO-TEF Congener I-TEF WHO- TEF 2378-TCDD 1 1 2378-TCDF 0.1 0.1 12378-PeCDD 0.5 1 23478-PeCDF 0.5 0.5 123478-HxCDD 0.1 0.1 12378-PeCDF 0.05 0.05 123678-HxCDD 0.1 0.1 123478-HxCDF 0.1 0.1 123789-HxCDD 0.1 0.1 123789-HxCDF 0.1 0.1 1234678-HpCDD 0.01 0.01 123678-HxCDF 0.1 0.1 OCDD 0.001 0.0001 234678-HxCDF 0.1 0.1 1234678-HpCDF 0.01 0.01 1234789-HpCDF 0.01 0.01 OCDF 0.001 0.0001 A. Kočan, Slovak Medical University Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) Quality assurance Preventive measures (quality of facilities, personnel and education, equipment and service, calibration, internal and recovery standards) Quality control Control measures (internal – blank and reference material analyses, external – interlaboratory comparison, audit) Reasons - repeatibility of measurements - comparison of results between laboratories - political and economical importance of results Terminology Calibration Limit of detection and quantification Sensitivity and specificity Accuracy, trueness, precision Method validation and verification Internal standards Recovery and surrogate recovery standards Certified reference materials interlaboratory calibration tests, GLP Standard operational procedure - General information (terminology, principles, range of use, limitations, safety procedures, toxicology, waste treatment) - Directives - Consumables and chemicals (glass, standards, solvents, reference materials) - Equipment (sampling and analytical equipment, service) - Calibration (standards, procedures) - Analytical scheme (method validation and verification) - Quality control (internal - blank, reference material, external – intercalibration) - Data interpretation - Annexes Mokrá - půdy 2002 - 4 vyhodnoceno: 25.4.2003 Koncentrace ng/g Číslo vzorku toluen 02-753 02-752 02-740 02-741 02-742 02-743 02-744 02-745 02-746 02-747 02-748 02-749 02-750 02-751 Lokalita GC blank Lab. blank RM 454 Hosten Čihálky 332 Vodojem Velká Bata1 Velká Bata2 Prostřed kopec 420Vel Bata Chlumek 1 Chlumek 2 Horák mysl. Nové pole jižní CVM LOQ Číslo zadavatele 303S 304S 305S 306S 307S 308S 309S 310S 311S 312S 313S 314S Datum odbě ru 14.11.02 14.11.02 14.11.02 14.11.02 14.11.02 14.11.02 14.11.02 14.11.02 14.11.02 14.11.02 14.11.02 14.11.02 KALIB30 Naváž ka (g) 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 Ředění 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Naftalen 0,10 1,86 26,74 12,5 6,6 7,5 5,2 5,5 11,8 13,5 7,1 6,6 8,6 5,9 8,5 0,10 Acenaftylen - 0,02 0,58 0,8 0,3 0,7 0,4 0,5 2,2 1,8 0,6 0,5 1,2 2,4 0,8 0,10 Acenaften - 0,04 1,22 1,4 0,3 1,4 1,6 0,6 5,3 3,4 2,5 0,8 2,0 5,4 1,2 0,10 Fluoren - 0,04 2,26 1,7 0,6 1,4 1,3 0,7 4,9 3,8 2,0 1,0 2,2 4,7 1,5 0,10 Fenantren - 0,12 23,96 24,9 6,4 20,5 18,8 8,4 69,1 59,4 14,2 13,6 29,5 109,3 16,8 0,10 Antracen - - 1,12 2,0 0,4 1,9 3,4 1,1 6,1 5,2 2,1 1,4 2,9 16,9 1,8 0,10 Fluoranten - - 27,78 68,2 13,7 58,0 42,0 24,2 213,0 162,5 40,7 37,6 82,5 450,2 42,9 0,10 Pyren - - 19,38 50,5 9,7 45,6 35,4 20,2 159,3 123,6 32,0 28,6 63,8 377,2 33,0 0,10 Benz(a)antracen - - 4,60 17,9 2,9 14,4 14,7 9,1 61,5 49,3 18,3 13,1 26,3 206,3 13,6 0,10 Chrysen - - 11,50 32,4 7,3 25,6 18,4 12,2 102,6 75,9 22,3 16,8 41,2 204,2 20,0 0,10 Benzo(b)fluoranten- - 18,30 61,0 11,7 32,2 23,6 20,4 169,5 128,2 28,0 29,4 67,7 261,1 31,2 0,10 Benzo(k)fluoranten- - 6,04 18,1 3,8 14,4 11,0 7,9 56,4 41,9 13,0 11,2 22,4 134,8 11,6 0,10 Benzo(a)pyren - - 8,34 27,6 3,5 23,6 20,3 13,3 92,8 71,6 24,2 18,4 38,4 285,9 21,3 0,10 Indeno(123cd)pyren- - 8,22 33,1 6,4 21,4 14,8 11,1 98,7 72,0 22,6 19,6 41,0 216,1 20,7 0,10 Dibenz(ah)antracen- - 0,82 2,7 0,6 2,4 1,6 0,9 7,1 8,3 1,8 2,3 4,1 25,8 1,8 0,10 Benzo(ghi)perylen- - 11,26 29,7 5,3 20,6 14,8 11,4 83,9 61,4 19,4 16,3 36,0 181,8 18,5 0,10 Suma PAHs 0,10 2,08 172,12 384,5 79,5 291,6 227,3 147,5 1144,2 881,8 250,8 217,2 469,8 2488,0 245,2 1,60 100% D-PAHs (ng)2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000 2 000 ředění 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 D8-naftalen 0% 0% 88% 72% 79% 66% 65% 80% 62% 66% 21% 61% 75% 81% 81% D10-fenantren 0% 0% 90% 77% 91% 68% 72% 86% 77% 79% 88% 79% 85% 94% 92% D12-perylen 0% 0% 86% 74% 34% 67% 73% 86% 83% 83% 89% 82% 93% 101% 96% GC blank ..... slepý vzorek přístroje GC-MS - nástřik čistého rozpouštědla do plynového chromatografu CRM ..... analýza certifikovaného referenčního materiálu Lab. blank ..... laboratorní slepý vzorek - analyzovaný celým analytickým postupem s čistými rozpouštědly a všemi použitými materiály RM ..... analýza laboratorního referenčního materiálu GPC blank ..... slepý vzorek GPC chromatografu NQ ..... nekvantifikováno - analyt byl překryt interferentem PUF blank, GF blank ..... terénní slepé vzorky - pasivní odběr na polyuretanovou pěnu a skleněné vlákno LOQ ..... meze stanovitelnosti PAHs in Ambient Air - Košetice 1996-2004 Weekly Sampling - Gas Phase 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 3.1.1996 3.7.1996 1.1.1997 2.7.1997 31.12.1997 1.7.1998 30.12.1998 30.6.1999 29.12.1999 28.6.2000 27.12.2000 27.6.2001 26.12.2001 26.6.02 25.12.02 25.6.03 24.12.03 23.6.04 22.12.04 Sampling Date PAHs[ng.m-3] Benzo[ghi]perylene Dibenzo[ah]anthracene Indeno[123cd]pyrene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Chrysene Benzo[a]anthracene Pyrene Fluoranthene Anthracene Phenanthrene Fluorene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Naphthalene