Environmental Economy Environmental (Green) Economy - Most of us accept the need for a more sustainable way to live, by reducing carbon emissions, developing renewable technology and increasing energy efficiency. - But are these efforts to save the planet doomed? A growing band of experts are looking at figures like these and arguing that personal carbon virtue and collective environmentalism are futile as long as our economic system is built on the assumption of growth. The science tells us that if we are serious about saving Earth, we must reshape our economy. - This, of course, is economic heresy... Liberal economy - main idea: free market, capable of self-regulation - in the market, supply (S) meets demand (D) which the "invisible hand of the market" can return to equilibrium when changing the price (P) or quantity (Q) of goods - quantity x price - given by demand - based on the utility of the good Liberal economy A free (perfect) market assume: - a large number of equally strong buyers and sellers - market participants have perfect information, without a time lag - buyers and sellers compete, and do not enter into collusions - consumers maximize benefits, producers maximize profits - the producer/consumer pays the actual costs - these reflect the final price Liberal economy A free (perfect) market assume: - a large number of equally strong buyers and sellers - market participants have perfect information, without a time lag - buyers and sellers compete, and do not enter into collusions - consumers maximize benefits, producers maximize profits - the producer/consumer pays the actual costs - these reflect the final price Market distortions - incomplete information - transaction costs (long chain of merchants) - artificial stimulation of demand - advertising - tendency to eliminate competition - formation of monopolies - price distortion: the price does not reflect the value of the goods Market distortions - incomplete information - transaction costs (long chain of merchants) - artificial stimulation of demand - advertising - tendency to eliminate competition - formation of monopolies Liberal economy A free (perfect) market assume: - a large number of equally strong buyers and sellers - market participants have perfect information, without a time lag - buyers and sellers compete, and do not enter into collusions - consumers maximize benefits, producers maximize profits - the producer/consumer pays the actual costs - these reflect the final price Market distortions - incomplete information - transaction costs (long chain of merchants) - artificial stimulation of demand - advertising - tendency to eliminate competition - formation of monopolies - price distortion: the price does not reflect the value of the goods Market distortions - incomplete information - transaction costs (long chain of merchants) - artificial stimulation of demand - advertising - tendency to eliminate competition - formation of monopolies Environmentalists‘ objections - public goods and the problem of externalities - consumption of goods vs. carrying capacity of the Earth Greening of the economy 1) Internalization of externalities = polluter pays principle - a product is disadvantaged by a higher price on the market = pressure to change technology or to perish Greening of the economy 1) Internalization of externalities = polluter pays principle - a product is disadvantaged by a higher price on the market = pressure to change technology or to perish 2) Ecological tax system - higher taxes are imposed on those products that are more harmful to the environment - electricity, natural gas, solid fuels Greening of the economy 1) Internalization of externalities = polluter pays principle - a product is disadvantaged by a higher price on the market = pressure to change technology or to perish 2) Ecological tax system - higher taxes are imposed on those products that are more harmful to the environment - electricity, natural gas, solid fuels 3) Eco-labels - people make choices not only by price but also by other value Greener economy – more radical - change economic indicators - GDP is unsatisfactory, better - GPI, HDI or others that better reflect the real development of society Greener economy – more radical - change economic indicators - GDP is unsatisfactory, better - GPI, HDI or others that better reflect the real development of society Radical Green economy – alternative system - criticism of the system based on growth of GDP - efforts to introduce alternative systems Steady state economics (H. Daly) Sustainable economy (P. Victor) To most economists, continual growth is a necessity and a slowly growing economy, or a “steady state” economy that puts the health of the planet first, means catastrophe. Many see endless growth as the only way to create jobs and reduce poverty. To most economists, continual growth is a necessity and a slowly growing economy, or a “steady state” economy that puts the health of the planet first, means catastrophe. Many see endless growth as the only way to create jobs and reduce poverty. Not everyone agrees. Peter Victor, an ecological economist at York University in Toronto, modelled the Canadian economy from 2005 to 2035 under three conditions: 1) business as usual 2) zeroing out all sources of economic growth 3) managed transition to a steady state (sustainable option). To most economists, continual growth is a necessity and a slowly growing economy, or a “steady state” economy that puts the health of the planet first, means catastrophe. Many see endless growth as the only way to create jobs and reduce poverty. Not everyone agrees. Peter Victor, an ecological economist at York University in Toronto, modelled the Canadian economy from 2005 to 2035 under three conditions: 1) business as usual 2) zeroing out all sources of economic growth 3) managed transition to a steady state (sustainable option). Business as usual produced no major surprises. The economy grew, but so did greenhouse gas emissions. Slamming on the economic brakes produced the catastrophe mainstream economists dread – GDP fell while unemployment and poverty soared. The third scenario, which phased in a carbon tax, boosted anti-poverty programmes and reduced working hours, yielded results that mainstream economists would never have dreamed of: GDP per person rose and stabilised at about 150 per cent of current levels, while unemployment, poverty and greenhouse gas emissions all fell. “It is possible for people to live well in a society in which economic stability rather than economic growth is the norm, where all its members flourish and social justice is served,” Victor concludes. Common goods issue • common goods – collective consumer goods, the consumption of which by any individual reduce the level of consumption of another individual • under the influence of active demand and unrestricted access, common goods are often abused or even looted • this pays also for global public goods, the use of which is not regulated by national legislation Common goods issue • common goods – collective consumer goods, the consumption of which by any individual reduce the level of consumption of another individual • under the influence of active demand and unrestricted access, common goods are often abused or even looted • this especially pays for global public goods, the use of which is not regulated by national legislation • public goods - collective consumer goods, the consumption of which by any individual does not reduce the level of consumption of another individual The Tragedy of the Commons „The Tragedy of the Commons“ Garrett Hardin, Science (1968) - two possible solutions: - Somali - Tyrranical (authority) Price x scarcity The degree of scarcity in economics is expressed by price → price - the most important source of information in the economy → does the actual price correspond to the scarcity of the goods? - NO! Price x scarcity The degree of scarcity in economics is expressed by price → price - the most important source of information in the economy → does the actual price correspond to the scarcity of the goods? - NO! Three reasons 1) the price does not correspond to the total value of the goods → utility x non-utility value 2) price distortions → subsidies, regulation, corruption 3) externalization of costs (externalities) → not counting all costs Price x scarcity The degree of scarcity in economics is expressed by price → price - the most important source of information in the economy → does the actual price correspond to the scarcity of the goods? - NO! Three reasons 1) the price does not correspond to the total value of the goods → utility x non-utility value 2) price distortions → subsidies, regulation, corruption 3) externalization of costs (externalities) → not counting all costs According to economists, there is no reason for the price of abundant resource - e.g. The price of today's forests? → real appreciation of natural goods can never be achieved (non-marketed values, health, heritage, etc.) - but it is possible to get closer → market mechanisms (alone) do not ensure the maintenance of a quality of the environment Value of the goods Total value of the goods = utility + non-utility value Utility values 1) direct → marketed values, - direct benefit from the consumption 2) indirect → non-marketed values, Value of the goods Total value of the goods = utility + non-utility value Utility values 1) direct → marketed values, - direct benefit from the consumption 2) indirect → non-marketed values, - functional benefit Value of the goods Total value of the goods = utility + non-utility value Value of the goods Total value of the goods = utility + non-utility value Option value → the value of preserving freedom of future decision (someday in the future I can use the goods) Value of the heritange → value of preservation by others, including future generations Existential values → existence of the goods itself (intrinsic value, value of life, value of being) Value of the goods Total value of the goods = utility + non-utility value Option value → the value of preserving freedom of future decision (someday in the future I can use the goods) Value of the heritange → value of preservation by others, including future generations Existential values → existence of the goods itself (intrinsic value, value of life, value of being) Increasing of the value Economic benefits of alternative management practices. „A 100-metre belt of dense mangroves could reduce the destructive energy of a tsunami by as much as 90 per cent.“ „ Coral reefs and mangroves of Belize yield about $15 mil. in fish, at least $150 mil. in tourism and about $150 million in storm protection per year. Price distortions with consequences for ecosystems Subsidy - meaning: Price distortions with consequences for ecosystems Subsidy - meaning: to support the desired (social) goals - industry growth, productivity… Consequences - Increased pressure on ecos. - eg. subsidies for pesticides → increase employment in production ↑ agricultural production, but also the overuse of "cheap" pesticides = eco. consequences, negative to the health of peasants, water contam. etc. Price distortions with consequences for ecosystems Subsidy - meaning: to support the desired (social) goals - industry growth, productivity… Consequences - Increased pressure on ecos. - eg. subsidies for pesticides → increase employment in production ↑ agricultural production, but also the overuse of "cheap" pesticides = eco. consequences, negative to the health of peasants, water contam. etc. - eg. subsidies for the fishing industry Price distortions with consequences for ecosystems Regulation - a "grow now, clean up later" approach consequence - in China, for example, in 1998, the cost of environmental damage and pollution was 14% of GDP! Corruption - embezzlement and theft of public goods with the „approval" of leaders - price increase (due to lost profits) with a consequent increase in mining Externalities "Unintended effects of economic activity which are not reflected in market transactions Externalities "Unintended effects of economic activity which are not reflected in market transactions Positive x negative externalities - not counting total production costs, use and disposal of products / services → transfer of these costs to other market participants spatially (elsewhere) or temporally (other times) Externalities "Unintended effects of economic activity which are not reflected in market transactions Positive x negative externalities - not counting total production costs, use and disposal of products / services → transfer of these costs to other market participants spatially (elsewhere) or temporally (other times) → market damage - the entrepreneur does not receive the correct signal about the effectiveness of his activity - the buyer does not receive the correct signal about the scarcity of the purchased goods (underestimation of the price of the goods) „Indeed, everywhere we look, we see products whose prices don’t reflect the true environmental costs of their production.“ T.H.Dixon, We must green the market Internalization of externalities „Polluter pays" → burdening the polluter with extra-market costs that are otherwise involuntarily payed by the public and future generations - including negative externalities in the price of the product → price increase → product not for sale → producer forced to change production to reduce negative externalities „Polluter pays" → burdening the polluter with extra-market costs that are otherwise involuntarily payed by the public and future generations - including negative externalities in the price of the product → price increase → product not for sale → producer forced to change production to reduce negative externalities Problems associated with internalization I) the free market model does not work in practice - prices determine monopolies and multinational companies → risk of relocation of production to countries with ↓ costs II) distance of environmental impacts in time and space → the problem of quantifying permanent externalities → nature complex system → impacts complex, nonlinear, with long latency III) often lacks a clear causality of the injuring-injured Internalization of externalities „Polluter pays" → burdening the polluter with extra-market costs that are otherwise involuntarily payed by the public and future generations - including negative externalities in the price of the product → price increase → product not for sale → producer forced to change production to reduce negative externalities Problems associated with internalization I) the free market model does not work in practice - prices determine monopolies and multinational companies → risk of relocation of production to countries with ↓ costs II) distance of environmental impacts in time and space → the problem of quantifying permanent externalities → nature complex system → impacts complex, nonlinear, with long latency III) often lacks a clear causality of the injuring-injured IV) nature provides its goods and services for free – common goods - the problem of determining the price of natural services, resources and the value of nature, human health, life, and just pay for the damage at all? Internalization of externalities Possibilities and methods of env. valuation - the price is formed on the relevant markets - for many goods there are no markets (common goods) → underestimation - valuation of the environment (natural resources) → determining the demand for the quality of nature's goods and evaluating the benefits they provide → assigning a certain value or price: a necessary precondition for adequate internalisation of externalities Valuing the „real“ value of natural resources I) market / off-market mechanisms - microeconomic level II) techniques at the macroeconomic level III) regulatory mechanisms (state) I) Market / off-market mechanisms - microecon. level (A) methods based on direct markets - creation of markets for environmental goods and services - privatization → the premise here is the opinion that the owner manages his private property better ... I) Market / off-market mechanisms - microecon. level (A) methods based on direct markets - creation of markets for environmental goods and services - privatization → the premise here is the opinion that the owner manages his private property better ... (B) methods based on proxy markets - the methods used to find and analyze certain representative markets I) Market / off-market mechanisms - microecon. level (A) methods based on direct markets - creation of markets for environmental goods and services - privatization → the premise here is the opinion that the owner manages his private property better ... (B) methods based on proxy markets - the methods used to find and analyze certain representative markets I) hedonic evaluation method - is based on the analysis of real markets, how positive or negative changes in the quality of the environment are reflected in the price of real estate - the price is therefore sought in the representative (real) real estate market and the difference in price corresponds to the financial value of the environment where the real estate stands II) travel cost method - finds out the amounts that people spend in order to visit the recreation area → such is its "value" criticism: a hidden assumption - the value of a territory is determined by market behavior Valuation of ecosystem services • ecosystem → production engines of the planet = life I) Market / off-market mechanisms - microecon. level III) methods of so-called off-market (non-market) evaluation - eg the method of conditional (contingent) evaluation finding a willingness to pay (for the preservation of a certain property) or a willingness to accept compensation (for damage to a certain property) → finding out the preferences of individuals (consumers) Willingness to pay Willingness to accept I) Market / off-market mechanisms - microecon. level III) methods of so-called off-market (non-market) evaluation - eg the method of conditional (contingent) evaluation finding a willingness to pay (for the preservation of a certain property) or a willingness to accept compensation (for damage to a certain property) → finding out the preferences of individuals (consumers) E.g. Conditional valuation of a certain area - to protect it? A questionnaire survey finds out how much an individual would be willing to pay for a visit to the newly proposed protected area, and how many times he visited it. E.g. 1st visit = 25 CZK, 2nd visit = 20 CZK, 3rd visit = 15 CZK etc. From these values, you can construct a pseudo-demand curve. The area under the curve then corresponds to the individual's willingness to pay. Criticism: hidden assumption - people are consumers with a priority of personal interest Willingness to pay Willingness to accept ad II) Macroeconomic level - efforts to assess the environmental damages objectively (eg damage to forests caused by acid rains) - efforts to count externalities from the scientific data 1) Cost-benefit analysis – analyis of pros and cons process: identification of positives (profits, benefits) + identification of negative impacts (losses, costs) → expression in cash → sum of all monetary values ​​of benefits, from which the costs for the given year are deducted → project implementation only if the result is positive criticism: - Lots of costs and benefits are hard to express in money (difficult monetization of ecosystems) 2) Life cycle analysis (LCA) - Evaluation of externalities that originates in the whole life cycle of a product or service Economic tools of environmental policy - indirect influencing of entities damaging the environment - does not operate on the basis of direct power but economic motivation 1) Negative stimulation fees → mostly income of the SFŽP and the state budget: - for environmental pollution (emissions to air, water, landfills) - for the use of natural resources (water, wood, minerals) - user fees (freons, dog fee ...) taxes - for environmental protection (road tax, tolls, consumption tax on coal fuels) - ecological tax reform penalty payments - fines, surcharges – eg. for electronics Economic tools of environmental policy 2) Positive stimulation tax relief (within VAT, income taxes, road taxes, real estate taxes) financial support (grants, subsidies, loans) deposit-refund systems - beer bottles EU ETS – emission trading system environmental insurance - environmental liability insurance - usually does not cover damage to the environment itself, to biodiversity and does not include remediation costs - transport insurance - covers accidents during transport. substances Consumer intervention Ecolabelling Eco-labels Other labels GDP - criticism and alternatives - the monetary value of goods and services created per year in a territory - a macroeconomic indicator for determining the performance of national economies GDP calculation - eg expenditure method → GDP = sum of following expenditures: - personal consumption expenditure (durable goods, short-term goods, services) - gross private domestic investment (fixed investment by companies, changes in inventories, fixed investment in housing) - government expenditure on the purchase of goods and services GDP - criticism and alternatives - the monetary value of goods and services created per year in a territory - a macroeconomic indicator for determining the performance of national economies GDP calculation - eg expenditure method → GDP = sum of following expenditures: - personal consumption expenditure (durable goods, short-term goods, services) - gross private domestic investment (fixed investment by companies, changes in inventories, fixed investment in housing) - government expenditure on the purchase of goods and services Criticism - GDP does not include services that people do outside the official market → garden work, cooking, counter-work… → illegal production - eg production and sale of drugs, prostitution… - GDP includes the costs of liquidation of environmental damage, the fight against crime… GPI – Genuine Progress Indicator - an indicator trying to better describe the quality of life in the territory - based on GDP, from which subtracts items associated with deterioration of the environment or society, and adds new items GPI – Genuine Progress Indicator GDP growth x happiness - assumption of the consumer society - ↑ consumption = ↑ happiness - What makes people happy? GDP growth x happiness - assumption of the consumer society - ↑ consumption = ↑ happiness - What makes people happy? - GDP per capita in the USA has tripled since 1950, the percentage of the population claiming to be very happy has not increased since the mid- 1970s. - In Japan, the number of happy people has not changed in the last few decades - In the UK, the percentage of very happy people fell from 52% (1957) to 36% (2006). GDP growth x happiness - assumption of the consumer society - ↑ consumption = ↑ happiness - What makes people happy? - GDP per capita in the USA has tripled since 1950, the percentage of the population claiming to be very happy has not increased since the mid- 1970s. - In Japan, the number of happy people has not changed in the last few decades - In the UK, the percentage of very happy people fell from 52% (1957) to 36% (2006). HDP x HPI (Happy Planet Index) Fair Trade - alternative to conv. international trade - emphasis on the social and environmental dimension of production and trade Fair Trade - alternative to conv. international trade - emphasis on the social and environmental dimension of production and trade Objective: sustainable development of producers, mainly in the "South" countries - Africa, Latin America and South and South-East Asia - providing fair business conditions - about 3,000 Fair Trade shops in Europe - about 70% are food (mostly coffee, cocoa, bananas, tea), 30% handicrafts - Fair Trade coffee - 2-3% of the European coffee market - largest market share - 50% of bananas in Switzerland - total retail sales turnover 6 billion euros (2014) Fair trade - principles It offers to the manufacturers: - adequate and stable prices for products - possibility of pre-financing (up to 50% of the order) - interest-free or low-interest investment loans - long-term business partnership and supply security - investments from the common fund in local infrastructure, social development and environmental protection projects - consulting (marketing, management, organic farming, etc.) It offers to the employees - social security and working conditions in accordance with the ILO It offers to consumers - quality products (organic?) at a reasonable price - a guarantee of the origin of goods - a choice Fair trade – reality - certification costs (repeated) high - not everyone can pay for it - repeated personal checks by Commissioners - sometimes guaranteed too low purchase prices (x quality) - however, certainty of guaranteed prices and consumption, and a feeling of self-sufficiency, very important, so farmers are mostly satisfied with FT