letter 160 nature genetics • volume 32 • september 2002 We have used large-scale insertional mutagenesis to identify functional landmarks relevant to cancer in the recently completed mouse genome sequence. We infected Cdkn2a−/− mice with Moloney murine leukemia virus (MoMuLV) to screen for loci that can participate in tumorigenesis in collaboration with loss of the Cdkn2a-encoded tumor suppressors p16INK4a and p19ARF. Insertional mutagenesis by the latent retrovirus was synergistic with loss of Cdkn2a expression, as indicated by a marked acceleration in the development of both myeloid and lymphoid tumors. We isolated 747 unique sequences flanking retroviral integration sites and mapped them against the mouse genome sequence databases from Celera and Ensembl. In addition to 17 insertions targeting gene loci known to be cancerrelated, we identified a total of 37 new common insertion sites (CISs), of which 8 encode components of signaling pathways that are involved in cancer. The effectiveness of large-scale insertional mutagenesis in a sensitized genetic background is demonstrated by the preference for activation of MAP kinase signaling, collaborating with Cdkn2a loss in generating the lymphoid and myeloid tumors. Collectively, our results show that large-scale retroviral insertional mutagenesis in genetically predisposed mice is useful both as a system for identifying genes underlying cancer and as a genetic framework for the assignment of such genes to specific oncogenic pathways. The Trp53 and Rb pathways are two of the principal pathways controlling cell proliferation that have been identified in human and mouse cells. The Cdkn2a locus is involved in both the p53 and Rb pathways by virtue of encoding p16INK4a, a regulator of CDK4/6-mediated Rb1 phosphorylation, and p19ARF, a modulator of Mdm2-mediated degradation of p53. Loss of Cdkn2a expression enhances the survival and proliferative potential of cells in the face of aberrant oncogenic signaling and cell-cycle entry1. The importance of Cdkn2a in tumor suppression is underscored by its frequent inactivation in human tumors by deletion, mutation or epigenetic silencing2. Mice deficient for both p16INK4a and p19ARF are viable but highly Fig. 1 MoMuLV-induced tumorigenesis in Cdkn2a–/– mice. a, Disease-free survival of MoMuLV-infected Cdkn2a–/– mice after neonatal infection. Diamonds represent MoMuLV-infected Cdkn2a–/– mice (n = 115); triangles represent MoMuLV-infected Cdkn2a–/+ mice (n = 37); squares represent MoMuLV-infected Cdkn2a+/+ mice (n = 27); and ‘x’ marks represent uninfected Cdkn2a–/– mice (n = 6). We did not detect any evidence of a tumor in four of the infected Cdkn2a–/– mice. b−e, Tumors in MoMuLV-infected Cdkn2a–/– mice. b, Spleen of a MoMuLV-infected Cdkn2a–/– mouse with a nodular tumor at the lower left. c, Hematoxylin and eosin staining of a spleen section of a MoMuLV-infected Cdkn2a–/– mouse with a histiocytic sarcoma, shown on the right at low magnification. d, The same section as c at higher magnification, stained with anti-F4/80 and horseradish peroxidase. Tumor cells uniformly stained with the antibody, whereas the staining in the normal portion of the liver is typical of that of hepatic mononuclear phagocytes29. e, Serial section from the same mouse as in d, stained with hematoxylin and eosin. This section shows the tumor at the lower left and a relatively normal hepatic architecture at the upper right. Genome-wide retroviral insertional tagging of genes involved in cancer in Cdkn2a-deficient mice Anders H. Lund1*, Geoffrey Turner2*, Alla Trubetskoy2, Els Verhoeven1, Ellen Wientjens1, Danielle Hulsman1, Robert Russell3, Ronald A. DePinho4, Jack Lenz2 & Maarten van Lohuizen1 *These authors contributed equally to this work. 1Division of Molecular Genetics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Departments of 2Molecular Genetics and 3Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA. 4Department of Adult Oncology, Genetics and Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Correspondence should be addressed to J.L. (e-mail: lenz@aecom.yu.edu) or M.v.L. (e-mail: m.v.lohuizen@nki.nl). Published online: 19 August 2002, doi:10.1038/ng956 0 25 50 75 100 0 100 200 300 400 age (d) MoMuLV –/– uninfected –/– MoMuLV +/– percentsurviving wild type a b c d e ©2002NaturePublishingGrouphttp://www.nature.com/naturegenetics letter nature genetics • volume 32 • september 2002 161 prone to tumors, succumbing to lymphomas and fibrosarcomas early in life3. Transcriptional regulation of Cdkn2a is complex, as evidenced by the growing number of proteins known to regulate its expression. These proteins include Bmi1, Dmp1, E2f family members, Ets, JunB, Myc and TBX2 (refs 4−10). Aberrant upstream signaling through Abl, β-catenin and Src and through the Ras–Raf–MAP kinase pathway can also effect activation of Cdkn2a8,11−15. To identify genes that act in collaboration with the combined loss of p16INK4a and p19ARF in tumorigenesis, we infected neonatal Cdkn2a–/– mice3 with MoMuLV. This retrovirus induces tumors by insertional activation of proto-oncogenes or, more rarely, by insertional inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes. Although infection by MoMuLV elicits T-cell lymphomas, tumor susceptibility and phenotype is strain-dependent16. Cdkn2a–/– mice infected with MoMuLV developed tumors with a significantly shorter mean latent period than that of Cdkn2a+/– or Cdkn2a+/+ littermate controls that were infected with MoMuLV (P < 0.0001, log-rank test) and that of uninfected Cdkn2a–/– siblings (Fig. 1a). This finding demonstrates a synergy between viral infection and loss of Cdkn2a expression in tumorigenesis. We observed that 80% of Cdkn2a–/– mice infected with MoMuLV developed lymphomas. Approximately 60% of these mice had Tcell, 12% B-cell, and 8% mixed B- and T-cell lymphomas. In addition, approximately 55% had histiocytic sarcomas, which were distinctive nodular tumors (Fig. 1b−c), usually in the liver or spleen. These sarcomas stained positive for the macrophage marker F4/80 Table 1 • Integration frequencies into known common insertion loci Cdkn2a–/– tumorsa wt and +/– tumors Myc 10/51 20% 8/46 17% Nmyc1 1/16 6% 2/23 9% Pim1 5/51 10% 0/45 0% Gfi1 14/51 27% 13/47 28% Bmi1 0/51 0% 0/47 0% aFrequencies of genomic rearrangements observed per number of tumors analyzed. Fig. 2 Mapping of 565 unique retroviral insertion sites onto the mouse genome assembly from Celera Genomics. Blue lines indicate single MoMuLV insertions, green lines loci previously identified by retroviral insertional mutagenesis, and red lines newly discovered cancer-related CIS loci, with candidate gene names in red. Chromosome ideograms were modified with permission from C.V. Beechey and E.P. Evans (see Methods). Chromosome Y has not been assembled by Celera Genomics, and no tags were assigned to it. ©2002NaturePublishingGrouphttp://www.nature.com/naturegenetics letter 162 nature genetics • volume 32 • september 2002 (Fig. 1d) and were transplantable into immunodeficient SCID mice (data not shown). Moreover, 40% of MoMuLV-infected Cdkn2a–/– mice sustained both lymphomas and histiocytic sarcomas. Histiocytic sarcomas occurred in four uninfected Cdkn2a–/– mice, albeit at later times than in MoMuLV-infected mice. We observed histiocytic sarcomas in approximately 10% of Cdkn2a+/– mice infected with MoMuLV, but found none in infected wildtype controls, indicating that Cdkn2a deficiency or reduction predisposes to histiocytic sarcomas. All of the Cdkn2a+/– and Cdkn2a+/+ mice infected with MoMuLV developed lymphomas, with no significant difference in the rate of tumorigenesis. On the basis of the demonstrated synergy between MoMuLV insertional mutagenesis and loss of Cdkn2a function, we began a large-scale analysis of retroviral insertion site sequences to identify new oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes. First, Southern-blot analysis of known CISs in MoMuLV-induced tumors revealed that genetic ablation of Cdkn2a did not significantly alter the insertion frequencies into these common loci (Table 1). Although these observations are based on a limited set of genes, it is likely that many specific tumorigenic events may benefit from loss of Cdkn2a expression, thus sensitizing the screen towards the identification of a broader spectrum of loci associated with cancer. From a panel of 104 tumors—57 lymphoid (55%) and 47 myeloid (45%)—we isolated a total of 747 unique MoMuLV integration sites and directly sequenced them using a combination of inverse PCR and splinkerette-aided insertion site amplification. Homology searches in GenBank and in the nearly complete mouse genome databases from Celera Genomics and Ensembl allowed us to unambiguously map 565 viral insertions (Fig. 2). Several viral integrations were found to target the same locus in independent tumors, thus defining a CIS and indicating the presence of a cancer-associated gene16. The mapping data revealed that 163 (28.8%) of the sequences were clustered in 45 CISs; 37 of these have not been described previously (Table 2). In addition, we identified single viral integrations into many loci with known links to cell-cycle regulation or cancer pathogenesis, such as Cdk2, Cdk8, Cdc25c, Mapk1, Fra1 and E2f2. Of the new CISs, 14 were specific to lymphomas, 6 were specific to the histiocytic sarcomas, Table 2 • CISs identified in tumors of Cdkn2a–/– mice Number GenBank Ensembl mouse Celera mouse Human of Candidate accession Mouse chromosome chromosome chromosome Locusa Celera IDb tags geneb number chromosome positionc positionc position Cell typed NKI-1 No ID 2 Rgs1 NM_015811 1 145163982−145186084 135762279−no hit 1q31 L NKI-2 mCG21261 2 Ggta1 NM_010283 2 35932137−35932421 31638654−31639099 9q33-q34 L NKI-3 mCG8151 3 Zfhx1b NM_015753 2 45582724−45586359 41327870−41331182 2q22 L NKI-4 mCG64382 8 Ptpn1 NM_011201 2 168789627−168845131 165422527−165471534 20q13.1−q13.2 L, HS NKI-5 mCG8829 2 Mef2d S68893 3 88925116−88929012 82005550−82008904 1q12−q23 L, HS mCG8841 Iqgap1 NM_016721 15q26 NKI-6 mCG16756 3 RIKEN cDNA NM_029789 3 95571261−95602603 87303050−87427968 1p21 L, HS NKI-7 mCG22374 2 Nfkb1 NM_008689 3 106285108−no hit 127772992−127857753 4q24 L, HS NKI-8 mCG7369 2 Rabggtb NM_011231 3 154489997−154490618 146325593−146326261 1p31 L NKI-9 mCG2332 2 putative AK013175 4 43733132−43783247 41397143−41447334 ND L, HS NKI-10 mCG65233 3 RIKEN cDNA XM_13153610 4 104505611−104665343 101393203−101543172 ND L NKI-11 mCG17461 3 Runx3 NM_019732 4 132639134−132789991 131734840−131779243 1p36 L, HS NKI-12 mCG7764 2 RIKEN cDNA NM_026383 4 133460472−133463348 132194843−132197692 ND L, HS NKI-13 mCG23363 2 Gnb1 NM_008142 4 150934253−151010713 152078608−152155328 1pter−p31.2 L NKI-14 mCG10252 2 Klf3 NM_008453 5 63873382−63995956 59883104−60002945 4p16.1−p15.2 L, HS NKI-15 mCG7209 2 Kdr NM_010612 5 75154747−75155055 70951478−70952215 4q12 L, HS NKI-16 mCG11116 3 Camkk2, mo NM_031338 5 120807339−120868275 116383995−116512644 12q24.2 L, HS NKI-17 mCG16286 2 KIAA0053, mo NM_014882 6 88356371−88401020 86035121−86077929 ND L, HS NKI-18 mCG19794 2 Hcph NM_013545 6 125626101−125626125 122564894−122564979 12p13 HS NKI-19 mCG62286 2 EST AV083176 6 130155495−130155708 127047268−127047481 ND L NKI-20 mCG13312 3 Kras2 NM_031515 6 145911824−145916127 140215453−140219542 12p12.1 L, HS NKI-21 mCG7264 2 Plaur NM_011113 7 16611803−16692064 9871320−9950546 19q13 L NKI-22 mCG51745 2 Rras2 NM_025846 7 103758158−103810818 94601976− 94604902 11pter−p15.5 L NKI-23 mCG22407 3 PSK, mo NM_016151 7 116737933−116883522 112639555−112918319 16 L, HS mCG22413 Maz AA915408 16p11.2 NKI-24 mCG13090 2 ZNF220 NM_006766 8 21537403−21537452 18309141−18309166 8p11 HS mouse ortholog NKI-25 mCG57225 3 EST BB653745 8 126716162−126866935 120231285−120365173 ND L, HS NKI-26 mCG21612 2 NHE7, AF298591 9 95206300−95210881 90165786−90170216 X L mouse ortholog NKI-27 mCG2827 6 Hbs1l NM_019702 10 21080626−21195919 17946731−18022547 6q23−q24 L NKI-28 mCG5175 2 Galgt1 NM_008080 10 127813456−127815198 109653266−109655579 12q13.3 L NKI-29 mCG7666 6 Rbp1B, mo AF199338 11 88413609−88417214 87602127−87605591 17q25 L, HS NKI-30 mCG1480 2 Dgke NM_019505 11 89769880−89818410 90822843−90872179 17q22 HS NKI-31 mCG20534, 2 Fkbp6 NM_033571 11 101188993−101220645 102752458−102783766 7q11.23 L NKI-32 mCG20453 2 Kif13a AB037923 13 46365600−46409349 41811568−41852808 6p23 HS NKI-33 mCG55520 2 EST BF549796 13 110028533−110034445 101660853−101666913 ND HS NKI-34 mCG62490 2 EST AV287890 17 3423327−3423365 891751−892712 ND HS NKI-35 mCG3890 4 Cabp2 NM_013878 19 6700612−6910493 2625769−2835944 11q13.1 L, HS NKI-36 mCG20866 2 DUSP5, mo NM_004419 19 53530620−5354765- 52164129−52180624 10q25 L NKI-37 mCG5050 2 Elf4 NM_062654 X 34081336−34081401 33637118−33637542 Xq26 L, HS aNewly discovered common insertion loci. Loci specific for the Cdkn2a–/– background, relative to previous screens27,28, are indicated in bold. NKI, Netherlands Cancer Institute. bCandidate genes are based on their proximity to integrations. mo, mouse ortholog. cThe position of both proximal and distal integration is indicated. dL, lymphoma; HS, histiocytic sarcoma; ND, not determined. ©2002NaturePublishingGrouphttp://www.nature.com/naturegenetics letter nature genetics • volume 32 • september 2002 163 and the remaining 17 consisted of sequences from both lymphomas and histiocytic sarcomas. As many mice had both histologically evident lymphoma and histiocytic sarcoma, it is likely that at least a fraction of the DNA samples were derived from tissue that was a mixture of both types of tumors. Many of the newly discovered CISs encode proteins that can be assigned to functional pathways previously associated with mitogenic processes or transformation. The identification of two Ras homologs, Kras2 and Rras2, is consistent with a large body of data establishing cooperative interactions between activated H-Ras and loss of Cdkn2a function15. Viral insertions near both Gnb1 (at locus NKI-13) and Gnb2 (single insertion) underline the importance of G-protein βγ-subunits in the regulation of signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation and survival17. Moreover, NKI-1, NKI-5 and NKI-17 also encode G-protein regulatory factors, and single viral insertions were mapped near Rap1a, Rap1b and an uncharacterized member of the Ras gene family. These findings further highlight the importance of deregulated Ras-like signaling in tumorigenesis. Three CISs, NKI-4, NKI-18 and NKI- 36, target phosphatase genes. Both Ptpn1 and Hcph have been proposed to activate Src through removal of an inhibitory tyrosine phosphate within the Src-homology 2 (SH2) domain18. The CIS NKI-36 targets the mouse ortholog of the gene (DUSP5) encoding dual-specificity protein phosphatase, which is thought to negatively regulate the activity of the ERK1 MAP kinase19. Notably, the insertions in NKI-36 are found within the gene, indicating a potential tumor-suppressor function. The urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (NKI-21) is central to several pathways implicated in tumor progression. Aside from functions in angiogenesis and invasion, the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor activates the ERK1/2 MAP kinases, probably through interactions with β-integrins and receptor tyrosine kinases20. Transcription factors constituted a second large group of candidate oncogenes. The factor NFκB, identified in NKI-7, has important functions in cell-cycle progression, transformation and survival21. Myeloid elf-1 like factor (Elf4, NKI-37), a member of the Ets family, is a potent transcriptional activator in both lymphoid and myeloid cells. Notably, Elf4 recognizes consensus DNA-binding sequences similar to those recognized by other Ets proteins, which directly upregulate the CDKN2A promoter7. The protein ZNF220 is implicated in subtypes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) carrying a t(8;16)(p11;p13) translocation22. The identification of the mouse ZNF220 ortholog as a CIS in histiocytic sarcomas (NKI-24) points to the use of this model to identify genes specifically involved in myeloid tumorigenesis. The targeting of a member of the AML gene family, Runx3 (Aml2, NKI-11), is notable. Human RUNX3 is located at 1p36, a region associated with structural aberrations in a number of neoplasias, including acute and chronic leukemia. In addition, RUNX3 was recently proposed to be an important tumor suppressor in human gastric cancers23, raising the question of how Runx family members may exert both oncogenic and tumorsuppressor functions. In NKI-3, the integration hot spot targets Zfhx1b, encoding a transcriptional repressor recently shown to repress E-cadherin and promote tumor-cell migration24. The validity and sensitivity of the screen is evidenced by the identification of many genes previously implicated in MoMuLVinduced tumorigenesis (Table 3). Specifically, 22 integrations targeted Myc, a major collaborator in tumorigenesis with loss of Cdkn2a25. Reciprocally, no insertions among the 104 tumors analyzed targeted Bmi1, a known CIS previously shown to encode a repressor of Cdkn2a4. We confirmed the ability of the screen to identify collaborators of Cdkn2a loss using three independent approaches. First, Southern-blot analysis of a selected subset of the newly discovered CISs in tumors from Cdkn2a–/– and wildtype littermate controls revealed Cdkn2a–/–-specific MoMuLV insertions in 2 of 45, 4 of 45 and 2 of 45 tumors analyzed for Zfhx1b, Ptpn1 and Rbp1B, respectively. We found no viral insertions at these loci in a panel of 38 Cdkn2a+/– and Cdkn2a+/+ tumors. Table 3 • Viral insertions into known and new CISs Number Mouse Human Locus of tags chromosome chromosome Known CISs Myc 22 15 8q24.12−q24.13 Gfi1 16 5 1p22 Tpl2 8 18 10p11.2 Pim1 7 17 6p21.2 Myb 4 10 6q22−q23 Ccnd1 3 7 11q13 Ccnd3 3 17 6p21 MycN1 3 12 2p24.1 Ets1 1 9 11q23.3 Evi26 1 14 10 Fgf8 1 19 10q24 Fos 1 12 14q24.3 His1 1 2 2q14−q21 Notch1 1 2 9q34.3 Sint1 1 11 17q25 Sox4 1 13 6p22.3 Zfp36 1 7 19q13.1 Newly discovered CISsa Dkmi5 1 3 1q21 Dkmi17 1 15 8q24 Dkmi22 1 19 11q13 Evi38 1 1 1q32 Evi42 1 2 9q34 Evi50 1 2 NDb Evi62 1 4 1p36.13−p36.12 Evi73 1 5 7p22−p21 Evi78 1 6 2p21 Evi82 1 7 19 Evi92 1 8 4 Evi102 1 10 ND Evi105 1 10 ND Evi112 1 11 17q11.2 Evi130 1 17 6p21 Evi134 1 17 2p22.3−p21 Evi146 1 6 12pter−p13.31 Evi148 1 11 5q31.1 aSingle insertions from Cdkn2a–/– tumors identified as CISs27,28. bNot determined. 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 1 2 3 4 5 time (d) relativegrowth wt MEFs + vector wt MEFs + Tpl2 wt MEFs + RAS Cdkn2a–/– MEFs + vector Cdkn2a–/– MEFs + Tpl2 Cdkn2a–/– MEFs + RAS Fig. 3 Ectopic expression of Tpl2 collaborates with loss of Cdkn2a. The graph shows proliferation curves for wildtype (wt) and Cdkn2a–/– primary mouse embryo fibroblasts infected with pBabepuro-Tpl2, pBabepuro-RASV12 or empty vector. Error bars indicate standard deviations for triplicate samples. ©2002NaturePublishingGrouphttp://www.nature.com/naturegenetics letter 164 nature genetics • volume 32 • september 2002 Second, we obtained experimental validation for a notable CIS within the screen: Tpl2, encoding a previously identified MAP kinase kinase kinase known to activate several MAP-kinase pathways26. Extending on the data generated from insertion site retrieval, Southern-blot analyses revealed MoMuLV insertions into Tpl2 in 16 of 24 myeloid tumors analyzed, consistent with an important role of Tpl2 in myeloid tumorigenesis. As myeloid tumors arose exclusively in the Cdkn2a–/– background, no control myeloid tumors were available for analysis. Whereas five Tpl2 insertions were found among tumors from mice sustaining mixed lymphoid and myeloid tumors or harboring sporadically appearing Cdkn2a–/– tumor types, no MoMuLV integrations were found at Tpl2 among 47 Cdkn2a–/– and 30 Cdkn2a+/+ or Cdkn2a+/– lymphomas. Ectopic expression of Tpl2 in mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) resulted in diminished growth, resembling that seen in wildtype MEFs expressing oncogenic Ras. In contrast, the proliferation rate of Cdkn2a–/– MEFs infected with a Tpl2-expressing retroviral vector was similar to that of mock-infected cells (Fig. 3), and the cells eventually reached a higher cell density than did mockinfected Cdkn2a–/– MEFs (data not shown). These findings demonstrate a collaboration between Tpl2 and loss of Cdkn2a and further support MAP-kinase activation as an important feature in Cdkn2a activation. Third, to analyze the extent to which we have identified genes that act in collaboration with loss of the tumor suppressor Cdkn2a, we carried out extensive comparative data analyses against the retroviral tagging screens described in the accompanying papers by Suzuki et al.27 and Mikkers et al.28. Of the 37 new CISs we identified, 18 loci were also identified as single or multiple hits in the screens described therein27,28. Thus, 19 new loci associated with cancer were identified on the Cdkn2a–/– background; these loci are targets for future investigations (Table 2). In addition, at several loci where we found overlaps among the three screens, we saw a significant skewing toward specific targeting of Cdkn2a–/–. For example, we found nine insertions in Ptpn1 on the Cdkn2a–/– background, whereas this locus is hit only once in each of the screens by Mikkers et al.28 and Suzuki et al.27 (P < 0.001, Fisher exact test). Similarly, targeting of the Rbp1B and Zfhx1b loci is significantly biased towards the Cdkn2a–/– background (P < 0.02 and P < 0.05, respectively). Although genetic predispositions, such as loss of Cdkn2a, favor activation of a specific subset of oncogenic pathways, the observed overlap between the three screens (including Myc, Myb and Gfi1) probably reflects common events in cancer that fall outside the functional groups identified in each of the systems used. Single insertions from the Cdkn2a–/– screen overlapped 18 of the CISs identified by Mikkers et al.28 or Suzuki et al.27, raising the proportion of insertions within CISs to 36.4%. Combined CIS analysis of the three screens (where a CIS is defined as three insertions within a window of 100 kb) revealed 15 additional CIS loci28. This finding underscores the cumulative nature of largescale insertional mutagenesis screens, the data from which have been assembled into a publicly available database. Many of the candidate genes identified in this mouse model have been linked to cancer in humans or belong to gene families associated with human neoplastic diseases. Our identification of 37 new CISs, along with the large number identified in the accompanying papers27,28, indicates that the ability to contribute to tumorigenesis is a potential property of many genes, not just a crucial few. Apart from its use in discovering new cancer genes, the power of the approach lies in the ability to focus on, and place these genes in, a limited set of signaling pathways associated with cancer. Owing to the specific genetic predisposition used in this screen, the majority of the loci can probably be functionally linked to the Cdkn2a locus, when the relevant candidate cancer genes have been verified, as is demonstrated by the preference for MAP-kinase activation via Tpl2. Evidence exists from both human tumors and rodent model systems showing that inactivation of Cdkn2a or downstream pathways is crucial in tumorigenesis. Thus, identification and functional characterization of genetic components acting on or in collaboration with these pathways is central to the understanding of many cancers. Methods MoMuLV tumorigenesis. Cdkn2a–/– and Cdkn2a+/– mice and wildtype littermates3 were injected intraperitoneally with 105 infectious units of MoMuLV within 72 h of birth. We killed diseased mice, necropsied them and then carried out Cdkn2a genotyping by PCR. We froze most of each tumor for genetic studies. Fragments of tumors were fixed in either 10% formalin or Bouin’s fixative, embedded in paraffin, sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. T-cell lymphomas appeared as lymphoblastic-like, diffuse tumors with pale-staining nuclei that were vesicular, pleiomorphic and frequently large. B-cell lymphomas appeared as lymphoblastic-like, diffuse tumors with moderately basophilic nuclei and prominent nucleoli. In some B-cell lymphomas, a fraction of cells showed immunoblastic morphology. We analyzed lymphomas by Southern blotting to assess T-cell receptor and immunoglobulin gene rearrangements (experimental details are available upon request). Cellsurface markers for hematopoietic lineages were determined by immunohistochemistry. We carried out histiocytic sarcoma transplantation into immunodeficient mice by subcutaneous injection, near the scapulae of BALB/c SCID mice, of approximately 4.5 × 105 disaggregated cells from macroscopically visible histiocytic liver nodules in virally infected Cdkn2a–/– mice. Tumors occurring in the livers of recipient mice histologically resembled those of donors. We confirmed that these tumors were of donor origin by PCR genotyping for the Cdkn2a allele with exon 2 deleted. Retrieval and analysis of MoMuLV integration site sequences. We amplified 463 viral insertion sites using splinkerette-aided amplification essentially as described in Mikkers et al.28. We retrieved 284 insertionsite sequences using inverse PCR on SacII-digested tumor DNA as described by Suzuki et al.27. All sequences have been deposited with GenBank (for exact insertion site positions, see Web Tables A–C online and the website listed below). Sequences of the MoMuLV−specific primers used for the nested inverse PCR are available upon request. We purified amplification products from agarose gels and subjected them to direct automated sequencing. To identify candidate genes, we filtered the insertion-site sequences for the presence of repetitive DNA and carried out homology searches using BLASTn in GenBank databases and in the mouse genome sequence databases from Celera Genomics (version 12) and Ensembl (Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium, Mouse Assembly 3 February 2002 freeze). Whereas CISs traditionally have been demonstrated using Southern blotting, the presence of the complete mouse genome allows for in silico CIS determination. Following a previously described statistical analysis28, we defined retroviral common insertion sites as two or more integrations within 26 kb, or three insertions within 300 kb. For a set of 500 insertions, these windows give a tolerable statistically calculated background of approximately 2.5 CISs occurring at random. For insertions flanking a gene, the accepted distance between insertions was set to 100 kb. Although the functional distance between viral insertions and candidate oncogenes is known to differ between loci, the statistical threshold set here is in accordance with viral integration patterns surrounding previously characterized common insertion sites. In some loci, no candidate gene could be found in the immediate vicinity of an insertion. Moreover, a current limitation to the insertional mutagenesis approach is the limited extent and fidelity of the mouse genome annotation. This will improve over time. When analyzing overlaps between the Cdkn2a–/– screen and the screens carried out by Mikkers et al.28 and Suzuki et al.27, sequence tags falling within 100 kb on either side of a CIS were defined as overlapping. ©2002NaturePublishingGrouphttp://www.nature.com/naturegenetics letter nature genetics • volume 32 • september 2002 165 Cell-culture assays. We cloned the Tpl2 cDNA26 into pBabe-puro. The retroviral vector pBabe-RASV12, procedures for growth, retroviral infection and proliferation analyses of primary mouse embryo fibroblasts have been described25. Briefly, MEFs were infected at passage 2, selected with 2 µg ml−1 of puromycin at passage 3 and seeded in triplicate with 25.000 cells per well in six-well plates at passage 4 for proliferation analysis. We measured relative proliferation using crystal violet staining. We repeated the experiment three times with independent batches of MEFs. URLs. Data from the insertional mutagenesis screens are available at http://protagdb.nki.nl; Mo-MLV viral insertion site positions can be found at http://protagdb.nki.nl; the reference Standard Ideogram/Anomaly Breakpoints of the Mouse (Beechey, C.V. & Evans, E.P.) can be found at http://www.mgu.har.mrc.ac.uk/anomaly/anomaly-intro.html. GenBank accession numbers. The retroviral flanking sequences have been deposited to GenBank, submission numbers AF524262–AF524826. Note: Supplementary information is available on the Nature Genetics website. Acknowledgments We thank L. Johnson, R. Stanley, D. Polsky, C. Cordon-Cardo, G. Hart, L. Spunk Jacobsen and R. Westrop for assistance. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (to J.L.) and a US National Institutes of Health training grant. A.H.L. was supported by a grant from the Danish Medical Research Council. Competing interests statement The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests. Received 23 April; accepted 8 July 2002. 1. Sherr, C.J. The Cdkn2a network in tumour suppression. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 731−737 (2001). 2. Ruas, M. & Peters, G. The p16INK4a/CDKN2A tumor suppressor and its relatives. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1378, F115−177 (1998). 3. Serrano, M. et al. Role of the INK4a locus in tumor suppression and cell mortality. Cell 85, 27−37 (1996). 4. Jacobs, J.J., Kieboom, K., Marino, S., DePinho, R.A. & van Lohuizen, M. The oncogene and Polycomb-group gene bmi-1 regulates cell proliferation and senescence through the ink4a locus. Nature 397, 164−168 (1999). 5. Inoue, K., Roussel, M.F. & Sherr, C.J. Induction of ARF tumor suppressor gene expression and cell cycle arrest by transcription factor DMP1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3993−3998 (1999). 6. Bates, S. et al. p14ARF links the tumour suppressors RB and p53. Nature 395, 124− 125 (1998). 7. Ohtani, N. et al. Opposing effects of Ets and Id proteins on p16INK4a expression during cellular senescence. Nature 409, 1067−1070 (2001). 8. Passegue, E. & Wagner, E.F. JunB suppresses cell proliferation by transcriptional activation of p16(INK4a) expression. EMBO J. 19, 2969−2979 (2000). 9. Zindy, F. et al. Myc signaling via the ARF tumor suppressor regulates p53dependent apoptosis and immortalization. Genes Dev. 12, 2424−2433 (1998). 10. Jacobs, J.J. et al. Senescence bypass screen identifies TBX2, which represses Cdkn2a (p19(ARF)) and is amplified in a subset of human breast cancers. Nature Genet. 26, 291−299 (2000). 11. Damalas, A., Kahan, S., Shtutma -dependent growth arrest and cooperates with Ras in transformation. EMBO J. 20, 4912−4922 (2001). 12. Zhu, J., Woods, D., McMahon, M. & Bishop, J.M. Senescence of human fibroblasts induced by oncogenic Raf. Genes Dev. 12, 2997−3007 (1998). 13. Radfar, A., Unnikrishnan, I., Lee, H.W., DePinho, R.A. & Rosenberg, N. p19(Arf) induces p53-dependent apoptosis during abelson virus-mediated pre-B cell transformation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13194−13199 (1998). 14. Lin, A.W. et al. Premature senescence involving p53 and p16 is activated in response to constitutive MEK/MAPK mitogenic signaling. Genes Dev. 12, 3008− 3019 (1998). 15. Serrano, M., Lin, A.W., McCurrach, M.E., Beach, D. & Lowe, S.W. Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell 88, 593−602 (1997). 16. Jonkers, J. & Berns, A. Retroviral insertional mutagenesis as a strategy to identify cancer genes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1287, 29−57 (1996). 17. Radhika, V. & Dhanasekaran, N. Transforming G proteins. Oncogene 20, 1607− 1614 (2001). 18. Bjorge, J.D., Jakymiw, A. & Fujita, D.J. Selected glimpses into the activation and function of Src kinase. Oncogene 19, 5620−5035 (2000). 19. Ishibashi, T., Bottaro, D.P., Michieli, P., Kelley, C.A. & Aaronson, S.A. A novel dual specificity phosphatase induced by serum stimulation and heat shock. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29897−29902 (1994). 20. Aguirre Ghiso, J.A., Kovalski, K. & Ossowski, L. Tumor dormancy induced by downregulation of urokinase receptor in human carcinoma involves integrin and MAPK signaling. J. Cell Biol. 147, 89−104 (1999). 21. Joyce, D. et al. NF-κB and cell-cycle regulation: the cyclin connection. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 12, 73−90 (2001). 22. Borrow, J. et al. The translocation t(8;16)(p11;p13) of acute myeloid leukaemia fuses a putative acetyltransferase to the CREB-binding protein. Nature Genet. 14, 33−41 (1996). 23. Li, Q.-L. et al. Causal relationship between the loss of RUNX3 expression and gastric cancer. Cell 109, 113−124 (2002). 24. Comijn, J. et al. The two-handed E box binding zinc finger protein SIP1 downregulates E-cadherin and induces invasion. Mol. Cell 7, 1267−1278 (2001). 25. Jacobs, J.J. et al. Bmi-1 collaborates with c-Myc in tumorigenesis by inhibiting cMyc-induced apoptosis via Cdkn2a. Genes Dev. 13, 2678–2690 (1999). 26. Patriotis, C., Makris, A., Chernoff, J. & Tsichlis, P.N. Tpl-2 acts in concert with Ras and Raf-1 to activate mitogen-activated protein kinase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 9755−9759 (1994). 27. Suzuki, T. et al. New genes involved in cancer identified by retroviral tagging. Nature Genet. 32 86–94 (2002). 28. Mikkers, H. et al. High-throughput retroviral tagging to identify components of specific signaling pathways in cancer. Nature Genet. 32 73–79 (2002). 29. Roth, P., Dominguez, M.G. & Stanley, E.R. The effects of colony-stimulating factor- 1 on the distribution of mononuclear phagocytes in the developing osteopetrotic mouse. Blood 91, 3773−3783 (1998). ©2002NaturePublishingGrouphttp://www.nature.com/naturegenetics