DEPENDENCY SCHOOL, THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE, NEOLIBERALISM Structure of the presentation §1) theories of growth §2) theories of international trade – neoclassical and its criticism §3) structuralist perspective - Prebish §4) new school of dependency studies §5) world system theory - Wallerstein § Production- possibility frontier §PPF shows the maximum amount of alternative combination of goods and services that a society can produce at a given time when there is full utilization of economics resources and technology §The PPF shifts outward over time as more resouces become availabe or technology is improved § PRODUCTION-POSSIBILITY FRONTIER §Economic problem of limited production – explained by PPF §ECONOMIC GROWTH occurs when the economy´s productive capabilites increase §- growth depicted as an outward shift of PPF PPF and growth §When production is at its maximum, increased output of A requires reduced production of other goods, §there s opportunity cost to the increased production of A §Increasing opportunity costs – continous expansion in the production of A is secured by sacrificing increasing amount of other goods. Opportunity cost §= the benefits forgone when a specific decision is made §Of two options - the opportunity cost of the option chosen is the opportunity forgone for the other option §(accounting vs. economic theory OP) Increasing costs §Recourses are not homogenous - not equally efficient in the production of goods and services §Not equally productive when used to produce alternative good §This imperfect substitutability of recourses – due to differences in the skillds of labour, fertility of soil, specialized funcion of machinery, buildings etc. Post-war concepts of development §BINNS, T.: Dualistic and unilinear concepts of development pp. 91-95, in: companion_II.pdf. §Dualism or dichotomous nature of development §Advanced and modern sector of the economy coexisted alongside the traditional and backward sectors (Binns, 2008:82). § Truman´s presidential address, 1949 Truman´s presidential address Arthur Lewis §1954 : Economic Development with unlimited labour §Proponent of dualistic structure of underdeveloped economies §Goal - absorption of underempoyed labour force in susbsistence agriculture §Very influential in the 60s and 70s Arthur Lewis §Criticism: failed to appreciate the positive role of small agriculture §Some successes of Green revolution – raising productivity in the rural substistence sector - help development process rather then obstacle Dualism in geographical concepts §Early spation development models §Different qualities and potential of contrasting regions §Initial regional inequalities as a prerequisite for eventual overall development Unilinear models - WW Rostow Institutionalists - Gunnar Myrdal, Albert Hirschmann §Cumulative causation §Particular regions – by virtue of some initial advantages - moved ahead = new increments of activities and growth will be concentrated in those regions already ahead. Criticism of Rostow´s model (and similar ones) §1) unilinear development - ´things can only get better´ x cf sub-Saharan countries and LA §Sub-Saharan worse off then at the independence §2) eurocentic model – developing countries will imitate the development path in Europe and America §3) development occurs in stages Neoliberalism, SAPs §Reading: SIMON, D. : Neoliberalism, stuctural adjustment and poverty reduction strategies, in : companion_II.pdf, pp. 86 §Dramatic oil price increases – 1973 and 1979 – triggered a slowdown, severe recession and debt crisis 1981-2 § Crisis of Keynesian model §Profound disillusionment - record of the state involvement in economic and social life §Keynesian state involvement - inefficient, bureaucratic, unnecessary drain on public coffers (Binns, 2008:87) Opportunity cost §= the benefits forgone when a specific decision is made §Of two options - the opportunity cost of the option chosen is the opportunity forgone for the other option §(accounting vs. economic theory OP) Dependency - readings §Conway, D.; Heynen N.: Dependency theories: from ECLA to André Gunder Frank and beyond, in. Companion_II.pdf §International division of labour §Based on Ricardo´s model of international trade §Factor endowment theory §Specialization on the production of good in which partricular country has comparative advantage FACTOR ENDOWMENT THEORY §Different countries – different factor endowments §Cf china, South Africa §Heckher Ohlin Hypothesis of international trade §Specialization according to the prevailing factor endowements §USA, UK – focus on what kind of goods? §Sierra Leone? Raul Prebish, Singer §LA historical marginalization and resultant underdevelopment – perpetuated by such unequal commercial arrangements §LA shoukd benefit from export strategies §Evidence showed oterwise §Structuralist economists – argued that core countries benefited at LA expense § § Frank – development of underdevelopment §Metropolis satellite relations occured not only among states bust also on region and sub-regional levels §Dependebcuy – perpetuated through global capitalims §Importance of historical significance and transformative impact of capitalism´s penetrartion into continents structures ISI §Import substitution industrialization §Prebish - insisted on major structural changes in development policy §Favoured switching to more domestic production under tariff protection §as a means of replacing industrial imports ISI §Capital goods, intermediate product and energy would be purchaised with national income revenue from export of primary commodities (Conway, Heynen, 2008:93) New forms of dependency §Multinational corporate power and authority over technology transfer anc capital investment emerged as a new form of dependency (Conway, Heynen, 2008:93). Fernando Cardoso §Associated dependent development §Triple alliance §Domestic elite in cooperation wt transnational corporation §ISI under authoritarian regimes, state policies favoured multinational capital at the expense of labour Theory of international trade §SAPSFORD, D.: Smith, Ricardo, and the world marketplace 1776-2007: back to the future? § Smith on international trade Classical depencency school §LA – ECLA , Prebish – head of ECLA §Voices of the periphery §Prebish – criticized outdated international division of labour §LA – asked to produce raw materials for industrial centers § § § André Gundar Frank §development of underdevelopment §Concepts of modernization school distilled from the categories derived from the Western world §Western categories are unable to guide an understanding of the problems facing 3W § Frank §Modernization school ignores the historical experience of colonialism §Metropolis-satellite relationship explain how underdevelopment works §Replicated within countries §Calcuta § Frank §Satellite flourishes when cut off from the centre §Industrialization during WWI WWII Social destruction . §Creation of client serving class §Extension of the colonial power §Corruption of local elites §Disintegration of communities, social conflicts § Hegemony §Educational system §Did not enhance knowledge and technological advances §Ubiquous knowledge § Baran – colonialism in India §Politics of de-industrialization §unfavorable terms of trade §Appropriation of 10% §Plus asymetry of power - Raul Prebish §Structuralist approaches §Critique of Ricardian theory of international trade - empirical evidence – did not prove §LA – growth during both wars §Close links with centers not beneficial to the growth of peripheries § §