Stano Pekár“Populační ekologie živočichů“  dN = Nr dt  study of organisms with special attention to stage or age structure  processes are associated to age, stage or size - fecundity is dependent on age (e.g., mammals), stage (e.g., insects) or size (e.g., fish) Four concepts: 1. Every population has a structure – individuals in each class have similar rate of reproduction and mortality 2. Every population has a specific intrinsic rate of increase 3. Every population has specific mortality x .. age/stage/size category px .. age/stage/size specific survival 4. Every population has a specific reproductive rate mx .. reproductive rate (expected average number of offspring per female) x x x S S p 1  main focus on births and deaths immigration & emigration is ignored  no adult survive  one (not overlapping) generation per year  egg pods over-winter  despite high fecundity they just replace themselves Chorthippus Richards & Waloff (1954) Annual species  breed at discrete periods  no overlapping generations Biennal species  breed at discrete periods  adult generation may overlap adults adults 0 birth t0 t1 adults pre-adults 0 birth t0 t1 adults t2 p pre-adults birth t0 t1adults t2 0 pre-adults p  breed at discrete periods  breeding adults consist of individuals of various ages (1-5 years)  adults of different generations are equivalent  overlapping generations Perennial species Parus major Perins (1965)  age/stage classification is based on developmental time  size may be more appropriate than age (fish, sedentary animals)  Hughes (1984) used combination of age/stage and size for the description of coral growth Age-size-stage life-table Agaricia agaricites  show organisms‘ mortality and reproduction as a function of age  examination of a population in a cohort = a group of individuals born at the same period  followed from birth to death  provide reliable information  designed for short-lived organisms  only females are included Cohort (horizontal) life-table Vulpes vulpes x Sx Dx lx px qx mx 0 250 50 1.000 0.800 0.200 0.000 1 200 120 0.800 0.400 0.600 0.000 2 80 50 0.320 0.375 0.625 2.000 3 30 15 0.120 0.500 0.500 2.100 4 15 9 0.060 0.400 0.600 2.300 5 6 6 0.024 0.000 1.000 2.400 6 0 0 0.000 Sx .. number of survivors Dx .. number of dead individuals lx .. standardised number of survivors qx .. age-specific mortality px .. age-specific survival 0S S l x x  x x x S D q  1 xxx SSD x x x l l p 1   examination of a population during one segment (time interval) - segment = group of individuals of different cohorts - designed for long-lived organisms  ASSUMPTIONS: - Birth rate and survival are constant over time - population does not grow - proportions of age classes in a sample corresponds to the real state  DRAWBACKS: confuses age-specific changes in e.g. mortality with temporal variation Static (vertical) life-tables Cervus elaphus Lowe (1969) x Sx Dx lx px qx mx 1 129 15 1.000 0.884 0.116 0.000 2 114 1 0.884 0.991 0.009 0.000 3 113 32 0.876 0.717 0.283 0.310 4 81 3 0.628 0.963 0.037 0.280 5 78 19 0.605 0.756 0.244 0.300 6 59 -6 0.457 1.102 -0.102 0.400 7 65 10 0.504 0.846 0.154 0.480 8 55 30 0.426 0.455 0.545 0.360 9 25 16 0.194 0.360 0.640 0.450 10 9 1 0.070 0.889 0.111 0.290 11 8 1 0.062 0.875 0.125 0.280 12 7 5 0.054 0.286 0.714 0.290 13 2 1 0.016 0.500 0.500 0.280 14 1 -3 0.008 4.000 -3.000 0.280 15 4 2 0.031 0.500 0.500 0.290 16 2 2 0.016 0.000 1.000 0.280  survival and reproduction depend on stage / size rather than age  age-distribution is of no interest  used for invertebrates (insects, invertebrates)  time spent in a stage / size can differ Lymantria dispar Campbell (1981) x Sx Dx lx px qx mx Egg 450 68 1.000 0.849 0.151 0 Larva I 382 67 0.849 0.825 0.175 0 Larva II 315 158 0.700 0.498 0.502 0 Larva III 157 118 0.349 0.248 0.752 0 Larva IV 39 7 0.087 0.821 0.179 0 Larva V 32 9 0.071 0.719 0.281 0 Larva VI 23 1 0.051 0.957 0.043 0 Pre-pupa 22 4 0.049 0.818 0.182 0 Pupa 18 2 0.040 0.889 0.111 0 Adult 16 16 0.036 0.000 1.000 185  display change in survival by plotting log(lx) against age (x)  sheep mortality increases with age  survivorship of lapwing (Vanellus) is independent of age but survival of sheep is age-dependent Pearls (1928) classified hypothetical age-specific mortality:  Type I .. mortality is concentrated at the end of life span (humans)  Type II .. mortality is constant over age (seeds, birds)  Type III .. mortality is highest in the beginning of life (invertebrates, fish, reptiles) ln(Survivorship) 0 Type I Type II Type III 1 Time - Sum of intrinsic and extrinsic mortality  fecundity - potential number of offspring  fertility - real number of offspring  semelparous .. reproducing once a life  iteroparous .. reproducing several times during life  birth pulse .. discrete reproduction (seasonal reproduction)  birth flow .. continuous reproduction Numberofoffsprings 0 Time reproductivepre-reproductive post-reproductive 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Time [Days] Fecundity Triaeris stenapsis Geospiza scandensnumber.ofbirths/individual 0 0.4 age 16 Cervus elaphus Odocoileus numberofbirths/individual 0 6age 0.8  k-value - killing power - another measure of mortality  k-values are additive unlike q Key-factor analysis - a method to identify the most important factors that regulates population dynamics  k-values are estimated for a number of years  important factors are identified by regressing kx on log(N) )ln(pk  x kK   over-wintering adults emerge in June  eggs are laid in clusters on the lower side of leafs  larvae pass through 4 instars  form pupal cells in the soil  summer adults emerge in August  begin to hibernate in September  mortality factors overlap Leptinotarsa decemlineata Harcourt (1971)  highest k-value indicates the role of a factor in each generation  profile of a factor parallel with the K profile reveals the key factor  emigration is the key-factor Summary over 10 years