Detailed Information on Publication Record
2012
Creative Commons and Grand Challenge to Make Legal Language Simple
MYŠKA, Matěj, Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ, Jaromír ŠAVELKA and Martin ŠKOPBasic information
Original name
Creative Commons and Grand Challenge to Make Legal Language Simple
Authors
MYŠKA, Matěj (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jaromír ŠAVELKA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Martin ŠKOP (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. Models and Ethical Challenges for Legal Systems, Legal Language and Legal Ontologies, Argumentation and Software Agents, p. 271-285, 15 pp. 2012
Publisher
Springer
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Stať ve sborníku
Field of Study
50501 Law
Country of publisher
Germany
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Publication form
printed version "print"
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14220/12:00062135
Organization unit
Faculty of Law
ISBN
978-3-642-35730-5
Keywords in English
legal language simplification certainty copyright Creative Commons
Tags
Změněno: 9/9/2020 14:47, Mgr. Petra Georgala
Abstract
V originále
In this paper we analyse the Creative Commons computerized licensing system. We draw the attention to the fact that despite considerable efforts to make the complicated task of licensing work using so-called free license as simple as possible, the system is apt to give rise to countless ambiguities often leading to copyright infringements. We maintain that the phenomenon has been caused by the modifications of ‘language’ that facilitates the communication of the relevant section of law and consequent loss of vital context and structure in the framework of which the communication has to be perceived. We come to a conclusion that while context and structure preserving modifications should be regarded as the preferable method of simplifying legal language, its scope is too narrow to achieve the goal of making legal language easily understandable for a layperson. Unconstrained simplification is powerful enough to achieve the goal but entails a danger of driving a layperson, as well as a professional, into undesirable outcomes.