Detailed Information on Publication Record
2012
Between units and producers : organization of creative work in Czechoslovak State Cinema 1945-1990
SZCZEPANIK, PetrBasic information
Original name
Between units and producers : organization of creative work in Czechoslovak State Cinema 1945-1990
Authors
SZCZEPANIK, Petr (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Kraków, Restart zespolów filmowych : Film Units : Restart, p. 271-312, 42 pp. 2012
Publisher
Ha!art
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Field of Study
Art, architecture, cultural heritage
Country of publisher
Poland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Publication form
printed version "print"
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14210/12:00058329
Organization unit
Faculty of Arts
ISBN
978-83-62574-73-5
Keywords (in Czech)
český film; Barrandov; tvůrčí skupiny
Keywords in English
Czech cinema; Barrandov studios; creative units
Tags
Změněno: 8/4/2013 16:24, Mgr. Vendula Hromádková
Abstract
V originále
So-called state-socialist mode of film production was in fact a peculiar hybrid of local, regional and global models: it was prepared by the Nazi cultural politics (the idea of centralized "dramaturgy" which enabled ideological control) and Aryanization (which made the post-war nationalization easier). After 1945 and later, after 1948 (when Communists took power in Czechoslovakia), it further developed according to local (Bata shoe factory, inspired by American scientific management) and global (Soviet system, silently inspired by Hollywood vertically integrated studios) models. These three levels of organizational tradition - both in terms of production mode and work culture - persisted as mutually interacting ingredients of the state monopoly until the late 1980s and even on. The aim of the paper is to articulate a comparative model for historical analysis of nationalized cinemas in the region, using the Barrandov studios in Prague as an example. The key question it asks is: how was creativity and day-to-day production of films tactically managed in a system where the only real producer was the state? What organizational instruments had to be developed to balance the centralized control with necessary creative freedom?
Links
GAP409/10/1361, research and development project |
|