J 2011

Bezdůvodné obohacení v užívacích vztazích založených normami veřejného práva

ADAMOVÁ, Hana

Basic information

Original name

Bezdůvodné obohacení v užívacích vztazích založených normami veřejného práva

Name (in English)

he unjustified enrichment in relations based of land use governed by the public law according to current and future legal regulution

Authors

ADAMOVÁ, Hana (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)

Edition

Právní fórum, Praha, Wolters Kluwer ČR, a. s. 2011, 1214-7966

Other information

Language

Czech

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

50500 5.5 Law

Country of publisher

Czech Republic

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14220/11:00064476

Organization unit

Faculty of Law

Keywords (in Czech)

bezdůvodné obohacení užívací vztahy omezení vlastnického práva

Keywords in English

unjustified enrichment land use restriction of the right of ownership
Změněno: 23/3/2013 20:57, Mgr. Hana Adamová, Ph.D.

Abstract

ORIG EN

V originále

Článek se zabývá dopady veřejnoprávní regulace umožňující určité osobě užívat pozemek jiného do soukromoprávních vztahů. Není-li současně upravana pro osobou, jejíž vlastnické právo je takto omezováno, otázka kompenzace za toto omezení, může dojít ke vzniku soukromoprávního vztahu z bezdůvodného obohacení.

In English

It is evident that unjustified enrichment as one of the basic institutes of private law can find its use also in cases concerning relations primarily based on the norms of public law with the purpose of achieving certain all-society interest. Application of regulation of unjustified enrichment can in some cases offer a way out in situations in which the legislator has forgotten to harmonize public interests and private interests in an explicit manner. Its use in case of restricting of the right of ownership in public interest and simultaneously for the benefit of other person may be regarded not only as a simpler solution of regulation of the relations of the concerned persons in its application, than that which would result from eventual direct application of Article 11 par. 4 of the Charter of fundamental rights and freedoms or § 128 of the Civil Code, but in the light of the above quoted findings of the Constitutional Court and decisions of the Supreme Court as a decision more convenient and better expressing the impacts of the given restriction. However it should not be overlooked that it is a sort of a substitute solution, and it would be more appropriate if in these cases the legislator had thought of an explicit legislative regulation, or had directly referred to similar use of the provision on unjustified enrichment. Unjustified enrichment is an institute aiming first of all to regulation of strictly private law relations, its application in usage relations based primarily on norms of public law may raise awkward questions.