2013
Intracerebrally recorded high frequency oscillations: Simple visual assessment versus automated detection
PAIL, Martin; Josef HALÁMEK; Pavel DANIEL; Robert KUBA; Ivana TYRLÍKOVÁ et. al.Basic information
Original name
Intracerebrally recorded high frequency oscillations: Simple visual assessment versus automated detection
Authors
PAIL, Martin; Josef HALÁMEK; Pavel DANIEL ORCID; Robert KUBA; Ivana TYRLÍKOVÁ; Jan CHRASTINA; Pavel JURÁK; Ivan REKTOR and Milan BRÁZDIL
Edition
Clinical Neurophysiology, Clare, Elsevier Ireland, 2013, 1388-2457
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Field of Study
30000 3. Medical and Health Sciences
Country of publisher
Ireland
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.979
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14740/13:00066144
Organization unit
Central European Institute of Technology
UT WoS
000324531400006
Keywords in English
High frequency oscillations; Spikes; Ripples; Fast ripples; Temporal lobe epilepsy; Extratemporal lobe epilepsy; Seizure onset zone; Epileptogenic zone
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Changed: 17/10/2013 13:16, Olga Křížová
Abstract
In the original language
Objective: We compared the possible contribution (in the detection of seizure onset zone – SOZ) of simple visual assessment of intracerebrally recorded high-frequency oscillations (HFO) with standard automated detection. Methods: We analyzed stereo-EEG (SEEG) recordings from 20 patients with medically intractable partial seizures (10 temporal/10 extratemporal). Independently using simple visual assessment and automated detection of HFO, we identified the depth electrode contacts with maximum occurrences of ripples (R) and fast ripples (FR). The SOZ was determined by independent visual identification in standard SEEG recordings, and the congruence of results from visual versus automated HFO detection was compared. Results: Automated detection of HFO correctly identified the SOZ in 14 (R)/10 (FR) out of 20 subjects; a simple visual assessment of SEEG recordings in the appropriate frequency ranges correctly identified the SOZ in 13 (R)/9 (FR) subjects. Conclusions: Simple visual assessment of SEEG traces and standard automated detection of HFO seem to contribute comparably to the identification of the SOZ in patients with focal epilepsies. When using macroelectrodes in neocortical extratemporal epilepsies, the SOZ might be better determined by the ripple range. Significance: Standard automated detection of HFO enables the evaluation of HFO characteristics in whole data. This detection allows general purpose and objective evaluation, without any bias from the neurophysiologist’s experiences and practice
Links
| ED1.1.00/02.0068, research and development project |
| ||
| GAP103/11/0933, research and development project |
| ||
| MSM0021622404, plan (intention) |
|