STUDNIČKA, Jan, Barbora ŘÍHOVÁ, Eva RENCOVÁ, Pavel ROZSÍVAL, Zora DUBSKÁ, Oldřich CHRAPEK, Petr KOLÁŘ, Vít KANDRNAL, Regina DEMLOVÁ, Šárka PITROVÁ and Jiří ŘEHÁK. Cost and effectiveness of therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration in routine clinical practice. Ophthalmologica. BERN: KARGER, 2013, vol. 230, No 1, p. 34-42. ISSN 0030-3755. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000350802.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Cost and effectiveness of therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration in routine clinical practice
Authors STUDNIČKA, Jan (203 Czech Republic), Barbora ŘÍHOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Eva RENCOVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Pavel ROZSÍVAL (203 Czech Republic), Zora DUBSKÁ (203 Czech Republic), Oldřich CHRAPEK (203 Czech Republic), Petr KOLÁŘ (203 Czech Republic), Vít KANDRNAL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Regina DEMLOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Šárka PITROVÁ (203 Czech Republic) and Jiří ŘEHÁK (203 Czech Republic).
Edition Ophthalmologica, BERN, KARGER, 2013, 0030-3755.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30200 3.2 Clinical medicine
Country of publisher Switzerland
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 1.867
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/13:00069347
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000350802
UT WoS 000321466100005
Keywords in English Age-related macular degeneration; Choroidal neovascular membrane; Ranibizumab; Pegaptanib; Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin; Cost-effectiveness
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Tereza Miškechová, učo 341652. Changed: 11/11/2019 12:42.
Abstract
Purpose: Evaluation of the cost and effectiveness of therapy for patients with the wet form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in routine clinical practice. Methods: A retrospective multicentre evaluation of changes in the best-corrected visual acuity in applied kinds of therapy and a comparison with the cost of individual therapeutic procedures. Results: An overall total of 788 eyes of 763 patients with an average age of 73.2 +/- 8.6 years was evaluated for a 1-year minimum period. In the ranibizumab and pegaptanib therapy groups, a reduction of 1.3 letters (p = 0.303) and 1.4 letters (p = 0.197) was found, respectively. In the group of photodynannic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin, a reduction of 5.2 letters was achieved (p < 0.001). Under the conditions of routine practice in the Czech Republic, the annual cost is highest (EUR 5,467.63/patient) in patients with pegaptanib therapy. The annual cost in patients with ranibizumab therapy is lower by EUR 1,220.16. The cost is nearly half (EUR 2,783.65) in the group treated with PDT with verteporfin. Conclusion: An initiation of AMD therapy by ranibizumab is cost-effective as compared to pegaptanib. Both ranibizumab and pegaptanib are significantly more efficient as compared to PDT with verteporfin. Therapy with ranibizunnab and pegaptanib, as compared to PDT with verteporfin, prevents the loss of 1 line of vision on the ETDRS chart for EUR 1,225.98 and 2,286.18, respectively.
PrintDisplayed: 9/9/2024 00:58