Detailed Information on Publication Record
2013
THE RESPONSE OF HUMULUS LUPULUS TO DROUGHT: THE CONTRIBUTION OF STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL PLANT TRAITS
GLOSER, Vít, Milan BALÁŽ, Radek JUPA, Halyna KOROVETSKA, Petr SVOBODA et. al.Basic information
Original name
THE RESPONSE OF HUMULUS LUPULUS TO DROUGHT: THE CONTRIBUTION OF STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL PLANT TRAITS
Authors
GLOSER, Vít (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Milan BALÁŽ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Radek JUPA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Halyna KOROVETSKA (804 Ukraine, belonging to the institution) and Petr SVOBODA (203 Czech Republic)
Edition
Mosónymagyarovár, Hungary, III. International Humulus Symposium, p. 149-154, 6 pp. 2013
Publisher
ICPBR, ISHS
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Stať ve sborníku
Field of Study
10600 1.6 Biological sciences
Country of publisher
Belgium
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Publication form
printed version "print"
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14310/13:00066508
Organization unit
Faculty of Science
ISBN
978-90-6605-696-1
ISSN
UT WoS
000333338300017
Keywords in English
transpiration; leaf water potential; hydraulic conductance; xylem
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 11/4/2014 10:12, doc. RNDr. Vít Gloser, Ph.D.
Abstract
V originále
The work summarizes information about key processes and structural traits that may affect water use in hop plants and how these traits affect plant response to drought. We measured changes in the transpiration rate, leaf water potential and stem hydraulic conductance in response to declining water availability in soil in several hop cultivars. We also explored the anatomical traits of xylem in the stem. We investigated structural and functional traits that may represent potential limitations in hop plants. Plants showed decreased transpiration rates and shoot water potential under declining water availability. We found that hop cultivars differ significantly in some traits that underlie water use such as the rate of transpiration and leaf water potential. These differences probably do not relate to differences in water transport in xylem and xylem anatomy. More likely, they are connected to differences in processes that regulate stomatal aperture in leaves.
Links
GA206/09/1967, research and development project |
|