Detailed Information on Publication Record
2012
Causal and Contrastive Discourse Markers in Novice Academic Writing
POVOLNÁ, RenataBasic information
Original name
Causal and Contrastive Discourse Markers in Novice Academic Writing
Authors
POVOLNÁ, Renata (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Brno Studies in English, Brno, Masarykova univerzita, 2012, 0524-6881
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
60200 6.2 Languages and Literature
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14410/12:00073470
Organization unit
Faculty of Education
Keywords (in Czech)
akademický diskurz; akademické psaní začínajících autorů; koherentní vztahy; příčinné vztahy; kontrastivní vztahy; diskurzní ukazatele; diplomové práce
Keywords in English
academic discourse; novice academic writing; coherence relations; causal relations; contrastive relations; discourse markers; Master's theses
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 15/4/2021 18:28, Dana Nesnídalová
Abstract
V originále
The article studies causal and contrastive relations between adjacent or more distant segments of discourse since they play an important role in expressing coherence relations (Taboada 2006) in academic discourse including discourse written by university students of English. By overtly signalling how the writer intends the discourse segment that follows to relate to the previous segment(s), discourse markers (DMs), in particular those expressing causal and contrastive relations, contribute to cohesion and enhance the establishment and maintenance of coherence in academic written discourse. While analysing a corpus of Master’s theses written by non-native novice writers the author of the article attempts to find out which DMs Czech students of English use when expressing causal and contrastive relations, whether they are able to use selected DMs correctly and, in addition, whether there are any differences in the preferences of students that accord with the fields of study – linguistics, literature and culture, and methodology – in which the Master’s theses are written.
Links
GA405/08/0866, research and development project |
|