J 2013

Expert opinion on toxicity profiling – report from a NORMAN expert group meeting.

HAMERS, T., J. LEGLER, Luděk BLÁHA, K. HYLLAND, I. MARIGOMEZ et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Expert opinion on toxicity profiling – report from a NORMAN expert group meeting.

Authors

HAMERS, T. (528 Netherlands, guarantor), J. LEGLER (528 Netherlands), Luděk BLÁHA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), K. HYLLAND (578 Norway), I. MARIGOMEZ (724 Spain), C. A. SCHIPPER (528 Netherlands), H. SEGNER (756 Switzerland), D. VETHAAK (528 Netherlands), H. WITTERS (56 Belgium), D. DE ZWART (528 Netherlands) and P.E.G. LEONARDS (528 Netherlands)

Edition

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2013, 1551-3777

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30304 Public and environmental health

Country of publisher

Netherlands

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14310/13:00071503

Organization unit

Faculty of Science

UT WoS

000316811300003

Keywords in English

Toxicity profile; Effect directed analysis; Water framework directive; Bioassays; Biomarkers

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 29/1/2014 15:02, Mgr. Lucie Bláhová, Ph.D.

Abstract

V originále

This article describes the outcome and follow up discussions of an expert group meeting (Amsterdam, October 9, 2009) on the applicability of toxicity profiling for diagnostic environmental risk assessment. A toxicity profile was defined as a toxicological fingerprint of a sample, ranging froma pure compound to a complex mixture, obtained by testing the sample or its extract for its activity toward a battery of biological endpoints. The expert group concluded that toxicity profiling is an effective first tier tool for screening the integrated hazard of complex environmental mixtures with known and unknown toxicologically active constituents. In addition, toxicity profiles can be used for prioritization of sampling locations, for identification of hot spots, and in combination with effect directed analysis (EDA) or toxicity identification and evaluation (TIE) approaches for establishing cause effect relationships by identifying emerging pollutants responsible for the observed toxic potency. Small volume in vitro bioassays are especially applicable for these purposes, as they are relatively cheap and fast with costs comparable to chemical analyses, and the results are toxicologically more relevant and more suitable for realistic risk assessment. For regulatory acceptance in the European Union, toxicity profiling terminology should keep as close as possible to the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) terminology, and validation, standardization, statistical analyses, and other quality aspects of toxicity profiling should be further elaborated.

Links

ED0001/01/01, research and development project
Name: CETOCOEN