Detailed Information on Publication Record
2013
Expert opinion on toxicity profiling – report from a NORMAN expert group meeting.
HAMERS, T., J. LEGLER, Luděk BLÁHA, K. HYLLAND, I. MARIGOMEZ et. al.Basic information
Original name
Expert opinion on toxicity profiling – report from a NORMAN expert group meeting.
Authors
HAMERS, T. (528 Netherlands, guarantor), J. LEGLER (528 Netherlands), Luděk BLÁHA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), K. HYLLAND (578 Norway), I. MARIGOMEZ (724 Spain), C. A. SCHIPPER (528 Netherlands), H. SEGNER (756 Switzerland), D. VETHAAK (528 Netherlands), H. WITTERS (56 Belgium), D. DE ZWART (528 Netherlands) and P.E.G. LEONARDS (528 Netherlands)
Edition
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2013, 1551-3777
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30304 Public and environmental health
Country of publisher
Netherlands
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14310/13:00071503
Organization unit
Faculty of Science
UT WoS
000316811300003
Keywords in English
Toxicity profile; Effect directed analysis; Water framework directive; Bioassays; Biomarkers
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 29/1/2014 15:02, Mgr. Lucie Bláhová, Ph.D.
Abstract
V originále
This article describes the outcome and follow up discussions of an expert group meeting (Amsterdam, October 9, 2009) on the applicability of toxicity profiling for diagnostic environmental risk assessment. A toxicity profile was defined as a toxicological fingerprint of a sample, ranging froma pure compound to a complex mixture, obtained by testing the sample or its extract for its activity toward a battery of biological endpoints. The expert group concluded that toxicity profiling is an effective first tier tool for screening the integrated hazard of complex environmental mixtures with known and unknown toxicologically active constituents. In addition, toxicity profiles can be used for prioritization of sampling locations, for identification of hot spots, and in combination with effect directed analysis (EDA) or toxicity identification and evaluation (TIE) approaches for establishing cause effect relationships by identifying emerging pollutants responsible for the observed toxic potency. Small volume in vitro bioassays are especially applicable for these purposes, as they are relatively cheap and fast with costs comparable to chemical analyses, and the results are toxicologically more relevant and more suitable for realistic risk assessment. For regulatory acceptance in the European Union, toxicity profiling terminology should keep as close as possible to the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) terminology, and validation, standardization, statistical analyses, and other quality aspects of toxicity profiling should be further elaborated.
Links
ED0001/01/01, research and development project |
|