Občanství Evropské unie - nedopsaná kapitola unijního práva

SEHNÁLEK, David. Občanství Evropské unie - nedopsaná kapitola unijního práva (Citizenship of the European Union - an Unfinished Chapter of the EU Law). Acta Universitatis Carolinae/Iuridica. Karolinum, 2013, vol. 59, No 2, p. 57-65. ISSN 0323-0619.

Basic information

Original name

Občanství Evropské unie - nedopsaná kapitola unijního práva

Name (in English)

Citizenship of the European Union - an Unfinished Chapter of the EU Law

Authors

SEHNÁLEK, David (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)

Edition

Acta Universitatis Carolinae/Iuridica, Karolinum, 2013, 0323-0619

---

Other information

Language

Czech

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

50500 5.5 Law

Country of publisher

Czech Republic

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14220/13:00072446

Organization unit

Faculty of Law

Keywords (in Czech)

právo pohybut a/nebo pobytu; unijní občanství; svoboda pohybu osob.

Keywords in English

right to move and/or reside; EU citizenship; free movement of persons.

Tags

rivok

---

Abstract

V originále

Článek analyzuje rozhodovací praxi Soudního dvora a právní úpravu vztahující se k institutu občanství Evropské unie. Zkoumána je otáka jeho účelu a obsahu v návaznosti na možnost pohybu a pobytu v rámci Evropské unie.

In English

The movement and residence of people within the EU are regulated by both the national and EU law where the first applies primarily to third country nationals and the second to EU citizens and where both regimes are of course different. The problem is that members of both groups are often linked together (as family members) meaning that both regimes must be used at once. The EU secondary law regulates the legal status of such citizen and his/her relatives only when exercising the right to move and reside in another Member state. The case law of the Court of Justice has extended the right to reside within the EU also to static EU citizens and their relatives. The article therefore analyses the respective case law of the Court of Justice. In addition to that the author tries to find the answer on following questions: what is the purpose of Art. 20 and 21 of the TFEU? Is there a right to move and subsequently reside in another Member state? Or shall they be understood as allowing the EU citizen to move and/or reside anywhere in the EU?