VANÍČEK, Jiří, Martin BULIK, Jaroslav BRICHTA and Radim JANČÁLEK. Utility of a rescue endovascular therapy for the treatment of major strokes refractory to full-dose intravenous thrombolysis. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY. LONDON: BRITISH INST RADIOLOGY, 2014, vol. 87, No 1036, p. "20130545", 9 pp. ISSN 0007-1285. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20130545.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Utility of a rescue endovascular therapy for the treatment of major strokes refractory to full-dose intravenous thrombolysis
Authors VANÍČEK, Jiří (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Martin BULIK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jaroslav BRICHTA (203 Czech Republic) and Radim JANČÁLEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution).
Edition BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, LONDON, BRITISH INST RADIOLOGY, 2014, 0007-1285.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30000 3. Medical and Health Sciences
Country of publisher United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 2.026
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/14:00077147
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20130545
UT WoS 000334291900006
Keywords in English ACUTE ISCHEMIC-STROKE; MECHANICAL THROMBECTOMY; RECANALIZATION; VALIDATION; RETRIEVER
Tags EL OK
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Soňa Böhmová, učo 232884. Changed: 6/11/2014 15:31.
Abstract
Objective: Large artery occlusion (LAO) in patients with major stroke predicts poor revascularization by intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and more likely results in a poor outcome. We focused on the effects of intra- arterial thrombolysis (IAT) and endovascular mechanical recanalization (EMR) as rescue therapies in major strokes refractory to IVT. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 87 patients (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale >20), who did not respond to full-dose IVT due to LAO, was performed based on their endovascular therapy status. IAT was performed as an intraclot infusion of alteplase, and EMR was provided by the Solitaire device (TM) (Covidien, Dubin, Ireland). The recanalization and 3-month outcome rates after IAT/EMR were correlated with a group of patients who were scheduled to receive endovascular treatment but who underwent only IVT. Results: We achieved successful recanalization by IAT and EMR in 68.7% and 76.1% of patients, respectively. Despite no significant differences in mortality between IAT and EMR, a trend towards better outcomes after IAT and a statistically significant increase for outcome-modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0-3 (45.7%) and mRS 0-2 (34.9%) after EMR was noted when compared with IVT. The degree of recanalization did not correlate with the functional results except for the good-moderate outcome after successful recanalization by EMR. Conclusion: EMR by the Solitaire device is a safe and beneficial method for the rescue treatment of patients with major stroke whose neurological status does not improve and who fail to recanalize the LAO after a 1-h full dose of IVT. Advances in knowledge: The article verifies efficiency of the Solitaire device in major strokes.
PrintDisplayed: 15/6/2024 05:25