Podrobný výpis o publikaci

MOLEK, Pavel a Michael LONGO. Freedom of Expression: European and Australian Perspectives. Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies. 2014, neuveden, č. 6, s. 2-16. ISSN 1837-2147.

Další formáty: BibTeX LaTeX RIS

Základní údaje
Originální název	Freedom of Expression: European and Australian Perspectives
Autoři	MOLEK, Pavel (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí) a Michael LONGO (36 Austrálie).
Vydání	Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies, 2014, 1837-2147.

Další údaje
Originální jazyk	angličtina
Typ výsledku	Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor	50500 5.5 Law
Stát vydavatele	Austrálie
Utajení	není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV	RIV/00216224:14220/14:00077321
Organizační jednotka	Právnická fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky	Australia; Europe; freedom of expression; judiciary; legal protections; limitations
Štítky	rivok
Příznaky	Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil	Změnila: Mgr. Petra Georgala, učo 32967. Změněno: 27. 2. 2015 11:18.

Anotace
This article explores the legal frameworks supporting the right to freedom of expression in Europe and Australia. Whereas in Europe there are overlapping protections of this right embedded within highly visible, legally binding instruments, the Australian protection rests on a judicial constitutional implication. Despite fundamental differences in salience, visibility and scope, it appears that neither jurisdiction is averse to limiting the right to free speech in certain circumstances, for instance when expressions are deemed gratuitously offensive. It is evident that the limits imposed on the freedom of expression both in Europe and in Australia determine the nature of the right. Whether or not the multiple layers of legal protection in Europe provide a bulwark against the erosion of the right to speech in Europe, this article reveals the comparative fragility of the constitutional implication in Australia.

Anotace

This article explores the legal frameworks supporting the right to freedom of expression in Europe and Australia. Whereas in Europe there are overlapping protections of this right embedded within highly visible, legally binding instruments, the Australian protection rests on a judicial constitutional implication. Despite fundamental differences in salience, visibility and scope, it appears that neither jurisdiction is averse to limiting the right to free speech in certain circumstances, for instance when expressions are deemed gratuitously offensive. It is evident that the limits imposed on the freedom of expression both in Europe and in Australia determine the nature of the right. Whether or not the multiple layers of legal protection in Europe provide a bulwark against the erosion of the right to speech in Europe, this article reveals the comparative fragility of the constitutional implication in Australia.