NEMEC, Juraj, Markéta ŠUMPÍKOVÁ, Stanislav KLAZAR and Matúš GREGA. Efficiency versus economy in public procurement. Online. In Löster T., Pavelka T. Conference Proceedings: The 8th International Days of Statistics and Economics. 1st ed. Praha: Melandrium, 2014, p. 1054-1063. ISBN 978-80-87990-02-5.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Efficiency versus economy in public procurement
Authors NEMEC, Juraj (703 Slovakia, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Markéta ŠUMPÍKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Stanislav KLAZAR (203 Czech Republic) and Matúš GREGA (703 Slovakia).
Edition 1. vyd. Praha, Conference Proceedings: The 8th International Days of Statistics and Economics, p. 1054-1063, 10 pp. 2014.
Publisher Melandrium
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Proceedings paper
Field of Study 50600 5.6 Political science
Country of publisher Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form electronic version available online
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14560/14:00074328
Organization unit Faculty of Economics and Administration
ISBN 978-80-87990-02-5
UT WoS 000350226700103
Keywords in English public procurement; lowest price; best bid
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Ing. Lenka Matějová, Ph.D., učo 175001. Changed: 15/1/2015 19:21.
Abstract
We argue that both active and passive corruption represent important problem in the Czech public procurement. We also propose that most of passive corruption is caused by “over-legislation” and the corresponding principle of bureaucratic safety. By documenting the problem of the too-frequent use of economy (lowest price) as the criterion for selecting the best bid by public procurers in CEE countries,we try to describe one concrete dimension of passive corruption. Usage of the lowest price criterion in public procurement has some advantages, but can deliver also problems if it is not used properly, as our two case studies proved.If the focus of procurement is on the process, on compliance with the rules rather than on the actual results, it is difficult to expect positive selections, especially for service and works. The only solution to this problem is radical change–to switch from a focus on the process to a focus on both the process and the results in public procurement by all the main actors, specifically the controlling and auditing bodies.
Links
GAP403/12/0366, research and development projectName: Identifikace a evaluace regionálně specifických faktorů úspěšnosti reforem v duchu NPM ? země CEE
PrintDisplayed: 8/8/2024 21:17