J 2014

Ictal and postictal semiology in patients with bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy

ŘEHULKA, Pavel, Irena DOLEŽALOVÁ, Eva JANOUŠOVÁ, Martin TOMÁŠEK, Petr MARUSIČ et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Ictal and postictal semiology in patients with bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy

Authors

ŘEHULKA, Pavel (203 Czech Republic, guarantor), Irena DOLEŽALOVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Eva JANOUŠOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Martin TOMÁŠEK (203 Czech Republic), Petr MARUSIČ (203 Czech Republic), Milan BRÁZDIL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Robert KUBA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)

Edition

EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, San Diego, Academic Press INC Elsevier Science, 2014, 1525-5050

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30000 3. Medical and Health Sciences

Country of publisher

United States of America

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

URL

Impact factor

Impact factor: 2.257

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/14:00078424

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.09.033

UT WoS

000346187700010

Keywords in English

Epilepsy; Bitemporal; Bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy; Invasive EEG; Semiology; Postictal unresponsiveness

Tags

EL OK, MP, RIV

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 30/1/2015 09:56, Ing. Mgr. Věra Pospíšilíková

Abstract

V originále

Bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy is characterized by evidence of seizure onset independently in both temporal lobes. Themain aim of the present study was to determine whether patients with evidence of independent bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (biTLE) can be identified noninvasively on the basis of seizure semiology analysis. Thirteen patients with biTLE, as defined by invasive EEG, were matched with 13 patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (uniTLE). In all 26 patients, the frequency of predefined clusters of ictal and periictal signs were evaluated: ictal motor signs (IMSs), periictalmotor signs (PIMSs), periictal vegetative signs (PIVSs), the frequency of early oroalimentary automatisms (EOAs), and the duration of postictal unresponsiveness (PU). Some other noninvasive and clinical data were also evaluated. A lower frequency of IMSs was noted in the group with biTLE (patients = 46.2%, seizures = 20.7%) than in the group with uniTLE (patients = 92.3%, seizures = 61.0%) (p = 0.030; p < 0.001, respectively). The individual IMS average per seizure was significantly lower in the group with biTLE (0.14; range = 0-1.0) than in the group with uniTLE (0.80; range = 0-2.6) (p = 0.003). Postictal unresponsiveness was longer than 5 min in more patients (75.0%) and seizures (42.9%) in the group with biTLE than in the groupwith uniTLE (patients = 30.8%, seizures= 18.6%) (p= 0.047; p= 0.002). The frequency of EOAs, PIMSs, PIVSs, and other clinical data did not differ significantly. There is a lower frequency of ictal motor signs and longer duration of postictal unresponsiveness in patients with biTLE. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Links

ED1.1.00/02.0068, research and development project
Name: CEITEC - central european institute of technology
Displayed: 3/11/2024 04:56