| SMETANOVÁ, Soňa, Luděk BLÁHA, Matthias LIESS, Ralf B. SCHAFER and Mikhail A. BEKETOV. Do predictions from Species Sensitivity Distributions match with field data? Environmental Pollution. OXFORD, OXON, ENGLAND: ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2014, vol. 189, JUN 2014, p. 126-133. ISSN 0269-7491. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.03.002. |
Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1228913,
author = {Smetanová, Soňa and Bláha, Luděk and Liess, Matthias and Schafer, Ralf B. and Beketov, Mikhail A.},
article_location = {OXFORD, OXON, ENGLAND},
article_number = {JUN 2014},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.03.002},
keywords = {Pollution; Risk assessment; Freshwater; Rivers; Statistical modelling},
language = {eng},
issn = {0269-7491},
journal = {Environmental Pollution},
title = {Do predictions from Species Sensitivity Distributions match with field data?},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749114000876},
volume = {189},
year = {2014}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1228913
AU - Smetanová, Soňa - Bláha, Luděk - Liess, Matthias - Schafer, Ralf B. - Beketov, Mikhail A.
PY - 2014
TI - Do predictions from Species Sensitivity Distributions match with field data?
JF - Environmental Pollution
VL - 189
IS - JUN 2014
SP - 126-133
EP - 126-133
PB - ELSEVIER SCI LTD
SN - 02697491
KW - Pollution
KW - Risk assessment
KW - Freshwater
KW - Rivers
KW - Statistical modelling
UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749114000876
L2 - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749114000876
N2 - Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) is a statistical model that can be used to predict effects of contaminants on biological communities, but only few comparisons of this model with field studies have been conducted so far. In the present study we used measured pesticides concentrations from streams in Germany, France, and Finland, and we used SSD to calculate msPAF (multiple substance potentially affected fraction) values based on maximum toxic stress at localities. We compared these SSD-based predictions with the actual effects on stream invertebrates quantified by the SPEAR(pesticides) . The results show that the msPAFs correlated well with the bioindicator, however, the generally accepted SSD threshold msPAF of 0.05 (5% of species are predicted to be affected) severely underestimated the observed effects (msPAF values causing significant effects are 2-1000-times lower). These results demonstrate that validation with field data is required to define the appropriate thresholds for SSD predictions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
ER -
SMETANOVÁ, Soňa, Luděk BLÁHA, Matthias LIESS, Ralf B. SCHAFER and Mikhail A. BEKETOV. Do predictions from Species Sensitivity Distributions match with field data? \textit{Environmental Pollution}. OXFORD, OXON, ENGLAND: ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2014, vol.~189, JUN 2014, p.~126-133. ISSN~0269-7491. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.03.002.
|
