PRACH, Karel, Kateřina ŘEHOUNKOVÁ, Kamila LENCOVA, Alexandra JÍROVÁ, Petra KONVALINKOVÁ, Ota MUDRÁK, V. STUDENT, Z. VANĚČEK, Lubomír TICHÝ, Petr PETRIK, Petr ŠMILAUER and Petr PYŠEK. Vegetation succession in restoration of disturbed sites in Central Europe: the direction of succession and species richness across 19 seres. Applied Vegetation Science. HOBOKEN: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 2014, vol. 17, No 2, p. 193-200. ISSN 1402-2001. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12064.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Vegetation succession in restoration of disturbed sites in Central Europe: the direction of succession and species richness across 19 seres
Authors PRACH, Karel (203 Czech Republic), Kateřina ŘEHOUNKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Kamila LENCOVA (203 Czech Republic), Alexandra JÍROVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Petra KONVALINKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Ota MUDRÁK (203 Czech Republic), V. STUDENT (203 Czech Republic), Z. VANĚČEK (203 Czech Republic), Lubomír TICHÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petr PETRIK (203 Czech Republic), Petr ŠMILAUER (203 Czech Republic) and Petr PYŠEK (203 Czech Republic).
Edition Applied Vegetation Science, HOBOKEN, WILEY-BLACKWELL, 2014, 1402-2001.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 10600 1.6 Biological sciences
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 2.548
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14310/14:00079517
Organization unit Faculty of Science
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12064
UT WoS 000332774800002
Keywords in English Species number; Ordination; Restoration; Succession; Target species
Tags AKR, rivok
Changed by Changed by: doc. Mgr. Lubomír Tichý, Ph.D., učo 6669. Changed: 13/3/2015 20:00.
Abstract
Questions (1) How do seres differ with respect to vegetation changes? (2) What are the directions of succession? (3) How do species numbers change? (4) How do target species, i.e. those typical of natural and semi-natural vegetation, participate in succession? (5) Are spontaneously developed successional stages acceptable from the point of view of ecosystem restoration? Location Extracted peatlands, bulldozed sites in forests destroyed by air pollution, an emerged bottom of a water reservoir, corridors of former Iron Curtain, artificial fishpond islands and barriers, sedimentary basins, spoil heaps from mining, stone quarries, forest clearings, road verges, sand and gravel-sand pits, ruderal urban sites, river gravel bars and abandoned arable fields, located in various parts of the Czech Republic in Central Europe. Methods Phytosociological releves were recorded in 10-25m(2) plots located in the centre of representative successional stages defined by their age, ranging from 1 to 100yrs. In total, we obtained 2392 vegetation samples containing 951 species. We performed DCA ordination to compare 19 seres. Desirable target species were considered as those representing (semi)-natural vegetation and all Red List species. Results The seres studied are more similar in their species composition in the initial and early stages, in which synathropic species prevail, than in the later stages when the vegetation differentiates. This divergence is driven mainly by local moisture conditions. In most cases, succession led to woodland, which usually established after ca. 20yrs. In very dry or wet places (with limited presence of woody species) open vegetation developed, often highly valuable from the restoration and conservation point of view. The total number of species and the number of target species increased in the majority of seres with successional age. Conclusions The vegetation in the sites studied formed a continuum along a moisture gradient and by successional age. The individual seres largely overlapped in their species composition; the sere identity was not significant. Spontaneous succession usually proceeded towards woodland, except at very dry or wet sites, and generally appeared to be an ecologically suitable way of ecosystem restoration of disturbed sites because target species became dominant over time.
PrintDisplayed: 23/8/2024 21:01