SVAČINOVÁ, Iva. Reconstruction of Metaphors in Argumentation : a Case Study of Lincoln’s Metaphor of “Swapping Horses While Crossing a Stream”. Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation. 2014, vol. 6, No 2, p. 67-89. ISSN 0718-8285.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Reconstruction of Metaphors in Argumentation : a Case Study of Lincoln’s Metaphor of “Swapping Horses While Crossing a Stream”
Name in Czech Rekonstrukce metafor v argumentaci : případová studie Lincolnovy metafory "výměny koně uprostřed proudu"
Authors SVAČINOVÁ, Iva (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation, 2014, 0718-8285.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 60300 6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
Country of publisher Chile
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14210/14:00079593
Organization unit Faculty of Arts
Keywords in English AMT model; endoxon; metaphor; pragma-dialectics; strategic maneuvering
Tags rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Ing. Mgr. Zdeňka Jastrzembská, Ph.D., učo 11408. Changed: 31/3/2015 15:30.
Abstract
The paper deals with the possibilities of reconstruction of metaphors as a means of argumentation provided by pragma-dialectics. In the case of Lincoln’s famous statement, in which he uses the metaphor of “swapping horses while crossing a stream” for replacing the President, two methods of the reconstruction currently under consideration are first introduced: metaphor as an argument by analogy in the “standard” model of pragma-dialectics and as a presentation device in pragma-dialectics extended by the concept of strategic maneuvering. Then, a competing reconstruction of Lincoln’s metaphors in the Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT) is presented, which is based on the development of the pragma-dialectical concept of material and procedural starting-points. Lincoln’s argument is reconstructed as a complex argument, where the metaphor figures as a sub-argument using locus from analogy that is used to support a datum in the main branch of the argument. This reconstruction is compared with previous solutions, and benefits of AMT are presented: the transparency of the captured argument structure and a more complex view on the strategic function of metaphor. For research of the strategic function of metaphor, the concept of keyword and the results of the research of the interaction between datum and endoxon are used. It is proposed to consider metaphor as a lexical unit used to identify a keyword.
Links
MUNI/A/0803/2013, interní kód MUName: Proměny a konstanty soudobé filozofie
Investor: Masaryk University, Category A
PrintDisplayed: 5/9/2024 21:43