Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1297246,
author = {Jarabinský, Ivan},
article_number = {Issue 1},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2014.990960},
keywords = {Russia; credibility; electoral management body; Central Election Commission; United Russia; A Just Russia},
language = {eng},
issn = {2159-9165},
journal = {East European Politics},
title = {Appearances are deceptive: credibility of the Russian Election Commission},
url = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21599165.2014.990960},
volume = {Volume 31},
year = {2015}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1297246
AU - Jarabinský, Ivan
PY - 2015
TI - Appearances are deceptive: credibility of the Russian Election Commission
JF - East European Politics
VL - Volume 31
IS - Issue 1
SP - 88-103
EP - 88-103
SN - 21599165
KW - Russia
KW - credibility
KW - electoral management body
KW - Central Election Commission
KW - United Russia
KW - A Just Russia
UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21599165.2014.990960
L2 - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21599165.2014.990960
N2 - This text focuses on the Russian Electoral Commission (EC) and its performance during the Russian parliamentary elections in 2011. The three-step analysis consists of (1) the EC’s role and organisational structure; (2) a description of the complaints over the EC’s performance and (3) a detailed focus on the EC’s decisions on these complaints’ relevance. Quantitative content analysis is used to analyse the original data and a new forensic method is developed to look for potential biases in the EC’s decisions on raised complaints. Evidence indicate loss of professionalism, dependence, and biased behaviour. Therefore the EC lacks its credibility.
ER -
JARABINSKÝ, Ivan. Appearances are deceptive: credibility of the Russian Election Commission. \textit{East European Politics}. 2015, Volume 31, Issue 1, p.~88-103. ISSN~2159-9165. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2014.990960.
|
