Detailed Information on Publication Record
2015
Combining various types of classifiers and features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging data in schizophrenia recognition
JANOUŠOVÁ, Eva, Daniel SCHWARZ and Tomáš KAŠPÁREKBasic information
Original name
Combining various types of classifiers and features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging data in schizophrenia recognition
Authors
JANOUŠOVÁ, Eva (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Daniel SCHWARZ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Tomáš KAŠPÁREK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, CLARE, ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, 2015, 0925-4927
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30000 3. Medical and Health Sciences
Country of publisher
Ireland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.477
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/15:00087443
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000354552900006
Keywords in English
Computational neuroanatomy; Classification; Intersubject principal component analysis (isPCA); Modified maximum uncertainty linear; discriminant analysis (mMLDA); Centroid method; Average linkage
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 9/7/2015 14:50, Soňa Böhmová
Abstract
V originále
We investigated a combination of three classification algorithms, namely the modified maximum uncertainty linear discriminant analysis (mMLDA), the centroid method, and the average linkage, with three types of features extracted from three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) brain images, specifically MR intensities, grey matter densities, and local deformations for distinguishing 49 first episode schizophrenia male patients from 49 healthy male subjects. The feature sets were reduced using intersubject principal component analysis before classification. By combining the classifiers, we were able to obtain slightly improved results when compared with single classifiers. The best classification performance (81.6% accuracy, 75.5% sensitivity, and 87.8% specificity) was significantly better than classification by chance. We also showed that classifiers based on features calculated using more computation-intensive image preprocessing perform better; mMLDA with classification boundary calculated as weighted mean discriminative scores of the groups had improved sensitivity but similar accuracy compared to the original MLDA; reducing a number of eigenvectors during data reduction did not always lead to higher classification accuracy, since noise as well as the signal important for classification were removed. Our findings provide important information for schizophrenia research and may improve accuracy of computer aided diagnostics of neuropsychiatric diseases.
Links
NT13359, research and development project |
|