Fuzzy Logic and Sorites Paradox : The Problem of Missing Input

k 2015

Fuzzy Logic and Sorites Paradox : The Problem of Missing Input

ŠTĚPÁNEK, Jan

Basic information

Original name

Fuzzy Logic and Sorites Paradox : The Problem of Missing Input

Authors

ŠTĚPÁNEK, Jan (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)

Edition

15th Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 3.-8. August, 2015, Helsinki, 2015

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Prezentace na konferencích

Field of Study

60300 6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion

Country of publisher

Finland

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

URL

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14210/15:00083538

Organization unit

Faculty of Arts

Keywords (in Czech)

sorites paradox; vágnost; logika; fuzzy logika

Keywords in English

sorites paradox; vagueness; logic; fuzzy logic

Abstract

V originále

Sorites paradoxes are a class of paradoxical arguments which arise as a result of using vague terms such as “heap”, “bald”, or “tall”. Vague terms, in contrast with precise terms, lack precise boundaries of application. There are objects to which a) the vague term applies, b) the vague term does not apply, and c) it is uncertain whether vague term applies or not (so called borderline cases). In borderline cases it is uncertain whether the vague term in question applies to them or not. Moreover, this uncertainty cannot be resolved by any enquiry. When we are asked whether some person is tall, we take only his height into consideration. When said person measures 150 centimetres, we are inclined to say that the person in not tall. When that person measures 220 centimetres, we would not hesitate calling that person tall. We, however, would not be so sure about a person measuring 184 centimetres. Yet we would be sure that a person measuring 190 centimetres is taller than a person measuring 185 centimetres. It seems that being tall is a matter of degree. At least proponents of fuzzy logic would say so. Sentences like “X is tall” can therefore have different truth value ranging from 1 – absolutely true – to 0 – absolutely false – according to X’s height. “X is tall” can have truth value of 0.48571 for X measuring 184 centimetres and truth value of 0.57143 for X measuring 190 centimetres. In the case of sorites paradox, at least one of its premises has an intermediate truth value and its consequence therefore cannot be absolutely true (or absolutely false). In my talk I am going to examine some of the problems that fuzzy logic faces when dealing with sorites paradoxes. I am going to point out that fuzzy logic can only be applied when certain class of vague terms is used to formulate sorites paradox, while it cannot be applied when the rest of vague terms is used.

Links

MUNI/A/1153/2014, interní kód MU

Name: Soudobé problémy a minulé podoby filozofické diskuse

Investor: Masaryk University, Category A

Citovat

ŠTĚPÁNEK, Jan. Fuzzy Logic and Sorites Paradox : The Problem of Missing Input. In 15th Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 3.-8. August, 2015, Helsinki. 2015.

@proceedings{1308022,
   author = {Štěpánek, Jan},
   booktitle = {15th Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 3.-8. August, 2015, Helsinki},
   keywords = {sorites paradox; vagueness; logic; fuzzy logic},
   language = {eng},
   title = {Fuzzy Logic and Sorites Paradox : The Problem of Missing Input},
   url = {http://clmps.helsinki.fi/},
   year = {2015}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 1308022
AU  - Štěpánek, Jan
PY  - 2015
TI  - Fuzzy Logic and Sorites Paradox : The Problem of Missing Input
KW  - sorites paradox
KW  - vagueness
KW  - logic
KW  - fuzzy logic
UR  - http://clmps.helsinki.fi/
N2  - Sorites paradoxes are a class of paradoxical arguments which arise as a result of using vague terms such as “heap”, “bald”, or “tall”. Vague terms, in contrast with precise terms, lack precise boundaries of application. There are objects to which a) the vague term applies, b) the vague term does not apply, and c) it is uncertain whether vague term applies or not (so called borderline cases). In borderline cases it is uncertain whether the vague term in question applies to them or not. Moreover, this uncertainty cannot be resolved by any enquiry. When we are asked whether some person is tall, we take only his height into consideration. When said person measures 150 centimetres, we are inclined to say that the person in not tall. When that person measures 220 centimetres, we would not hesitate calling that person tall. We, however, would not be so sure about a person measuring 184 centimetres. Yet we would be sure that a person measuring 190 centimetres is taller than a person measuring 185 centimetres. It seems that being tall is a matter of degree. At least proponents of fuzzy logic would say so. Sentences like “X is tall” can therefore have different truth value ranging from 1 – absolutely true – to 0 – absolutely false – according to X’s height. “X is tall” can have truth value of 0.48571 for X measuring 184 centimetres and truth value of 0.57143 for X measuring 190 centimetres. In the case of sorites paradox, at least one of its premises has an intermediate truth value and its consequence therefore cannot be absolutely true (or absolutely false). In my talk I am going to examine some of the problems that fuzzy logic faces when dealing with sorites paradoxes. I am going to point out that fuzzy logic can only be applied when certain class of vague terms is used to formulate sorites paradox, while it cannot be applied when the rest of vague terms is used.
ER  -

ŠTĚPÁNEK, Jan. Fuzzy Logic and Sorites Paradox : The Problem of Missing Input. In \textit{15th Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 3.-8. August, 2015, Helsinki}. 2015.

Detailed Information on Publication Record