Experimental philosophy! The combination of words that makes not only analytic philosophers to get up from their chairs and lament (or ideally up from their armchairs and stay quiet). It has its supporters and also determined opponents. However, is it possible that dislike of experimental philosophy as such and criticism associated with it are based on the mistaken assumption that experimental philosophy is a monolithic project with unified goals and methodology? Aim of this paper is to show how diverse this project actually is and how many experimental philosophies really exist. Is there any hope that at least one branch could gain for itself (not only) analytic philosopher's sympathy?