Detailed Information on Publication Record
2015
Military Power and Trade Policy – Roots of Contemporary Geopolitical Economy
KRPEC, Oldřich and Vladan HODULÁKBasic information
Original name
Military Power and Trade Policy – Roots of Contemporary Geopolitical Economy
Authors
KRPEC, Oldřich (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Vladan HODULÁK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Bingley (United Kingdom), Theoretical Engagements in Geopolitical Economy, p. 205-234, 30 pp. Research in Political Economy (30A), 2015
Publisher
Emerald
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Field of Study
50601 Political science
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Publication form
printed version "print"
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14230/15:00084075
Organization unit
Faculty of Social Studies
ISBN
978-1-78560-295-5
Keywords in English
Economic history; trade policy; military power; national state; geopolitical economy; Charles Tilly
Změněno: 11/10/2017 14:23, doc. Mgr. et Mgr. Oldřich Krpec, Ph.D.
Abstract
V originále
To discuss the historical roots of contemporary geopolitical economy, this paper aims to explore the complex and influential analysis of Tilly's formation of European national states as a predominant type of territorial political organization in contemporary world. To do this, Tilly described different eras of dominant organization of warfare in relation to state organization: patrimonialism, brokerage, nationalization, specialization. In this paper, we explore the link between the organization of military power and trade policy. We are trying to answer the question, if it is possible to credibly state a connection between the trade policy types pursued by selected states in specific historical periods and Tilly’s eras of dominant form of organization of warfare. For this purpose, we developed a typology of trade policies of important states throughout the history, using the economic history research of leading experts in the field. Our conclusion is that such a connection – between trade policy and Tilly’s eras of organization of warfare – can be made and that this connection is solidly supported by economic history. Our analysis may be of value for any critical assessment of international trade relations in contemporary geopolitical economy – and of influential cosmopolitan interpretations of the liberal trade regime of 19th century or globalization in 20th century.