C 2015

NATO Enlargement: Disaster or Success? Evaluation of Worst Case Scenarios

KŘÍŽ, Zdeněk

Basic information

Original name

NATO Enlargement: Disaster or Success? Evaluation of Worst Case Scenarios

Name in Czech

NATO Enlargement: Disaster or Success? Evaluation of Worst Case Scenarios

Authors

KŘÍŽ, Zdeněk (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)

Edition

1. vyd. Warsaw - Prague - Brussels, NEWCOMERS NO MORE? Contemporary NATO and the Future of the Enlargement from the Perspective of “Post-Cold War” Members, p. 117-130, 14 pp. NATO PUBLIC DIPLOMACY DIVISION, 2015

Publisher

International Relations Research Institute in Warsaw

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Field of Study

50601 Political science

Country of publisher

Belgium

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Publication form

electronic version available online

References:

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14230/15:00084149

Organization unit

Faculty of Social Studies

ISBN

978-83-62784-04-2

Keywords (in Czech)

NATO; rozšiřování; obavy; realita

Keywords in English

NATO; enlargement; fears; reality

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 2/5/2016 16:23, Ing. Alena Raisová

Abstract

V originále

Despite the strong criticism against the NATO enlargement policy, we can conclude that the enlargement has not caused any significant damage to the Alliance. NATO’s internal cohesion did not suffer a great loss, as seeking a consensus between members is just as difficult as it was in the Cold War period. The dividing lines between members on controversial issues are not drawn on the grounds of the length of membership. Moreover, no new iron curtains have been dropped, as the “new” member states further support the NATO “open door” policy. Last but not least, almost all NATO members, not only “the newcomers”, should increase their military expenditures. The only exception is an obvious deterioration of relations with Russia, which occurred after Russia had launched the war with Georgia in 2008, and especially when it annexed Crimea and started a “hybrid war” against Ukraine in 2014.

In Czech

Despite the strong criticism against the NATO enlargement policy, we can conclude that the enlargement has not caused any significant damage to the Alliance. NATO’s internal cohesion did not suffer a great loss, as seeking a consensus between members is just as difficult as it was in the Cold War period. The dividing lines between members on controversial issues are not drawn on the grounds of the length of membership. Moreover, no new iron curtains have been dropped, as the “new” member states further support the NATO “open door” policy. Last but not least, almost all NATO members, not only “the newcomers”, should increase their military expenditures. The only exception is an obvious deterioration of relations with Russia, which occurred after Russia had launched the war with Georgia in 2008, and especially when it annexed Crimea and started a “hybrid war” against Ukraine in 2014.

Files attached

2015-NATO-Newcomers-No-More.pdf
Request the author's version of the file