Informační systém MU
KŘÍŽ, Zdeněk. NATO Enlargement: Disaster or Success? Evaluation of Worst Case Scenarios. In Robert Czulda, Marek Madej. NEWCOMERS NO MORE? Contemporary NATO and the Future of the Enlargement from the Perspective of “Post-Cold War” Members. 1. vyd. Warsaw - Prague - Brussels: International Relations Research Institute in Warsaw, 2015. s. 117-130. NATO PUBLIC DIPLOMACY DIVISION. ISBN 978-83-62784-04-2.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název NATO Enlargement: Disaster or Success? Evaluation of Worst Case Scenarios
Název česky NATO Enlargement: Disaster or Success? Evaluation of Worst Case Scenarios
Autoři KŘÍŽ, Zdeněk (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí).
Vydání 1. vyd. Warsaw - Prague - Brussels, NEWCOMERS NO MORE? Contemporary NATO and the Future of the Enlargement from the Perspective of “Post-Cold War” Members, od s. 117-130, 14 s. NATO PUBLIC DIPLOMACY DIVISION, 2015.
Nakladatel International Relations Research Institute in Warsaw
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Obor 50601 Political science
Stát vydavatele Belgie
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání elektronická verze "online"
WWW URL
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14230/15:00084149
Organizační jednotka Fakulta sociálních studií
ISBN 978-83-62784-04-2
Klíčová slova česky NATO; rozšiřování; obavy; realita
Klíčová slova anglicky NATO; enlargement; fears; reality
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Ing. Alena Raisová, učo 36962. Změněno: 2. 5. 2016 16:23.
Anotace
Despite the strong criticism against the NATO enlargement policy, we can conclude that the enlargement has not caused any significant damage to the Alliance. NATO’s internal cohesion did not suffer a great loss, as seeking a consensus between members is just as difficult as it was in the Cold War period. The dividing lines between members on controversial issues are not drawn on the grounds of the length of membership. Moreover, no new iron curtains have been dropped, as the “new” member states further support the NATO “open door” policy. Last but not least, almost all NATO members, not only “the newcomers”, should increase their military expenditures. The only exception is an obvious deterioration of relations with Russia, which occurred after Russia had launched the war with Georgia in 2008, and especially when it annexed Crimea and started a “hybrid war” against Ukraine in 2014.
Anotace česky
Despite the strong criticism against the NATO enlargement policy, we can conclude that the enlargement has not caused any significant damage to the Alliance. NATO’s internal cohesion did not suffer a great loss, as seeking a consensus between members is just as difficult as it was in the Cold War period. The dividing lines between members on controversial issues are not drawn on the grounds of the length of membership. Moreover, no new iron curtains have been dropped, as the “new” member states further support the NATO “open door” policy. Last but not least, almost all NATO members, not only “the newcomers”, should increase their military expenditures. The only exception is an obvious deterioration of relations with Russia, which occurred after Russia had launched the war with Georgia in 2008, and especially when it annexed Crimea and started a “hybrid war” against Ukraine in 2014.
Zobrazeno: 11. 8. 2022 18:56