What Would an Informant Tell Me after Reading My Paper? On the Theoretical Significance of Ethical Commitment and Political Transparency in Symmetrical Practice of Studying Religion(s)

FUJDA, Milan. What Would an Informant Tell Me after Reading My Paper? On the Theoretical Significance of Ethical Commitment and Political Transparency in Symmetrical Practice of Studying Religion(s). Religio : revue pro religionistiku. Brno: Česká společnost pro religionistiku o.s., 2015, vol. 23, No 1, p. 57-86. ISSN 1210-3640.

Basic information

• Original name: What Would an Informant Tell Me after Reading My Paper? On the Theoretical Significance of Ethical Commitment and Political Transparency in Symmetrical Practice of Studying Religion(s)
• Authors: FUJDA, Milan (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
• Edition: Religio : revue pro religionistiku, Brno, Česká společnost pro religionistiku o.s. 2015, 1210-3640.

Other information

• Original language: English
• Type of outcome: Article in a journal
• Field of Study: Archaeology, anthropology, ethnology
• Country of publisher: Czech Republic
• Confidentiality degree: is not subject to a state or trade secret
• WWW: Digitální knihovna FF MU
• RIV identification code: RIV/00216224:14210/15:00084500
• Organization unit: Faculty of Arts
• Keywords in English: study of religion(s); research methodology; research ethics; politics of research; reflexivity; principle of symmetry; ethnography; postcolonialism; management of uncertainty; democracy; risk society
• Tags: rivok
• Tags: International impact, Reviewed

Abstract

This article introduces the methodological principle of symmetry as developed in science and technology studies (STS). However simple in its formulation, this principle is unexpectedly complex in practice and has farreaching consequences. Adherence to the principle of symmetry in the study of religion(s) is one promising avenue through which practical solutions to many theoretical and methodological problems may be formulated in response to postmodern and postcolonial critique of the study of religion(s) as well as of the modern scientific practice in general. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the promises of the symmetrical approach, the ways of its practical enactment, the complications of this enactment, and some solutions for these complications. The arguments and demonstrations provided here show that: (1) demarcating the research field of the study of religion(s) through the concept “religion” in itself creates asymmetries which contradict objective empirical and theoretical study; (2) the practical enactment of the principle demands taking important ethical and political decisions in order to prepare the practical conditions for research and analysis; (3) making these decisions and maintaining these conditions is necessary in order to achieve theoretical objectivity and build good and transparent theories; and (4) being faithful to these decisions during the process of data analysis is extremely complicated and can only be more or less successfully achieved on the basis of (a) high degree of ethical commitments towards the participants which empower them politically in relation to the researcher and the research itself, and (b) by analysing the process of data collection and analysis in exactly the same way (i.e. symmetrically) as the activities of all other actors engaged in the research. In this sense modernist ideas concerning moral and political disengagement as the condition for neutrality, objectivity and truth are reversed.

Links

• MUNI/A/1148/2014, interní kód MU: Name: Inovativní teoretické a metodologické perspektivy v religionistice (Acronym: ITMEPRE)

Investor: Masaryk University, Category A