Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1316052,
author = {Reddish, Paul and Tok Siew Ling, Penny and Kundt, Radek},
article_location = {Roma},
article_number = {2},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2014.1003518},
keywords = {agency; anthropomorphism; asperger syndrome; autism spectrum disorders; behaviour; belief; cognitive science; mentalizing; prayer; religion; ritual; theory of mind},
language = {eng},
issn = {1050-8619},
journal = {The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion},
title = {Religious Cognition and Behaviour in Autism: The Role of Mentalizing},
volume = {26},
year = {2016}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1316052
AU - Reddish, Paul - Tok Siew Ling, Penny - Kundt, Radek
PY - 2016
TI - Religious Cognition and Behaviour in Autism: The Role of Mentalizing
JF - The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion
VL - 26
IS - 2
SP - 95-112
EP - 95-112
PB - Taylor & Francis Group
SN - 10508619
KW - agency
KW - anthropomorphism
KW - asperger syndrome
KW - autism spectrum disorders
KW - behaviour
KW - belief
KW - cognitive science
KW - mentalizing
KW - prayer
KW - religion
KW - ritual
KW - theory of mind
N2 - Mentalizing, or theory of mind, has been argued to be critical for supporting religious beliefs and practices involving supernatural agents. As individuals with autism spectrum conditions have been found to have deficits in mentalizing, this raises the question as to how they may conceive of gods and behave in relation to gods. To examine this, we compared high functioning individuals with autism (HFA) to typically developing individuals across seven key aspects of religious cognition and behaviour: (1) strength of belief; (2) anthropomorphism of god concepts; (3) felt closeness towards the god; (4) prayer habits; (5) attraction to prayer; (6) efficacy of prayer; and (7) a sense of agency whilst praying. A battery of mentalizing tasks was administered to measure mentalizing ability, along with the Autism-Spectrum Quotient. As expected, typically developing subjects performed better than HFA subjects in the advanced mentalizing task. However, no statistically significant differences were found with first order and second order false belief tasks. In contrast to our predictions and previous research on the religiosity of HFA, we found very little differences between the groups in their religious cognition and behaviour. Moreover, the relationship between mentalizing ability and most of our measures of religious cognition and behaviour was weak and negative. Our data suggest that HFA's deficits in mentalizing appear to have only minimal impact on the way they interact and think about gods. We end the paper by re-evaluating the role mentalizing may have in religious cognition and behaviour.
ER -
REDDISH, Paul, Penny TOK SIEW LING and Radek KUNDT. Religious Cognition and Behaviour in Autism: The Role of Mentalizing. \textit{The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion}. Roma: Taylor \&{} Francis Group, 2016, vol.~26, No~2, p.~95-112. ISSN~1050-8619. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2014.1003518.
|
