LIKAVČAN, Lukáš and Tereza RULLEROVÁ. A slightly different ontology for ecological economics (implications included). In 11th International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE) - Transformations. 2015.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name A slightly different ontology for ecological economics (implications included)
Name (in English) A slightly different ontology for ecological economics (implications included)
Authors LIKAVČAN, Lukáš and Tereza RULLEROVÁ.
Edition 11th International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE) - Transformations, 2015.
Other information
Type of outcome Presentations at conferences
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Organization unit Faculty of Social Studies
Keywords in English ontology, ANT, embeddedness, politics of value
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Lukáš Likavčan, Ph.D., učo 362455. Changed: 14/12/2015 15:31.
Abstract
The notion of embeddedness of socioeconomic relations in natural environment is widespread in ecological economics. If we look at this concept from perspective of Actor-network-theory (ANT), we find out that it rests on a supposition of dualism between independently existing external, material reality and reality socially produced (and thus subject-relative). How to transcend this dual category towards more egalitarian ontology, one that does not draw sharp line between nature and society? What ecological economics can benefit from such an ontological shift?
Abstract (in English)
The notion of embeddedness of socioeconomic relations in natural environment is widespread in ecological economics. If we look at this concept from perspective of Actor-network-theory (ANT), we find out that it rests on a supposition of dualism between independently existing external, material reality and reality socially produced (and thus subject-relative). How to transcend this dual category towards more egalitarian ontology, one that does not draw sharp line between nature and society? What ecological economics can benefit from such an ontological shift?
PrintDisplayed: 30/7/2024 22:27