KŘÍŽ, Zdeněk a Kateřina FRIDRICHOVÁ. Libya and Criteria for Humanitarian Intervention. Politologický časopis. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2015, roč. 2015, č. 3, s. 183-199. ISSN 1211-3247. doi:10.5817/PC2015-3-183.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Libya and Criteria for Humanitarian Intervention
Název česky Libye a kritéria pro humanitární intervenci
Autoři KŘÍŽ, Zdeněk (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí) a Kateřina FRIDRICHOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí).
Vydání Politologický časopis, Brno, Masarykova univerzita, 2015, 1211-3247.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 50601 Political science
Stát vydavatele Česká republika
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14230/15:00085941
Organizační jednotka Fakulta sociálních studií
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/PC2015-3-183
UT WoS 000445539700001
Klíčová slova česky humanitární intervence; Libye; spravedlivá válka; RtoP; NATO
Klíčová slova anglicky Humanitarian intervention; Libya; just war theory; RtoP; NATO
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Blanka Farkašová, učo 97333. Změněno: 18. 2. 2019 09:34.
Anotace
When seeking guidelines for worst-case scenario, military intervention under the Responsibity to Protect looks to the just war tradition. We tried to pinpoint the most important criteria, drawing on the Responsibility to Protect report, subsequent RtoP development and relevant authors to create a background to which compare the NATO’s operation in Libya. These criteria were not met during the intervention, as is shown in this article. The criterion of just cause could be seen as fulfilled, albeit this admission is done very grudgingly – the loss of life was not that large comparing to other tragedies that did not trigger intervention. The Libyan intervention is most questionable when it comes to right intentions and proportional means that suggest that the goal of interveners was to topple the regime not protect the civilians. These results bring the discussion of the weakness of the RtoP approach when it comes to defining, which populations should be helped under this doctrine and whether the nature of victims should be taken into consideration.
Anotace česky
When seeking guidelines for worst-case scenario, military intervention under the Responsibity to Protect looks to the just war tradition. We tried to pinpoint the most important criteria, drawing on the Responsibility to Protect report, subsequent RtoP development and relevant authors to create a background to which compare the NATO’s operation in Libya. These criteria were not met during the intervention, as is shown in this article. The criterion of just cause could be seen as fulfilled, albeit this admission is done very grudgingly – the loss of life was not that large comparing to other tragedies that did not trigger intervention. The Libyan intervention is most questionable when it comes to right intentions and proportional means that suggest that the goal of interveners was to topple the regime not protect the civilians. These results bring the discussion of the weakness of the RtoP approach when it comes to defining, which populations should be helped under this doctrine and whether the nature of victims should be taken into consideration.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 2. 10. 2022 09:27