2015
Exploring the planetary boundary for chemical pollution
DIAMOND, Miriam L.; Cynthia A. DE WIT; Sverker MOLANDER; Martin SCHERINGER; Thomas BACKHAUS et. al.Basic information
Original name
Exploring the planetary boundary for chemical pollution
Authors
DIAMOND, Miriam L.; Cynthia A. DE WIT; Sverker MOLANDER; Martin SCHERINGER; Thomas BACKHAUS; Rainer LOHMANN; Rickard ARVIDSSON; Ake BERGMAN; Michael HAUSCHILD; Ivan HOLOUBEK; Linn PERSSON; Noriyuki SUZUKI; Marco VIGHI and Cornelius ZETZSCH
Edition
Environment International, OXFORD (ENGLAND), Pergamon Press, 2015, 0160-4120
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Field of Study
30304 Public and environmental health
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 5.929
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14310/15:00086631
Organization unit
Faculty of Science
UT WoS
000353092400002
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-84922439343
Keywords in English
Planetary boundary; Chemical pollution; Chemical emissions; Stockholm Convention; Tipping point; Global threshold; Pollution controls; Ecosystem health protection; Human health protection; Chemical management
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Changed: 16/3/2016 15:20, Mgr. Michaela Hylsová, Ph.D.
Abstract
In the original language
Rockstrom et al. (2009a, 2009b) have warned that humanity must reduce anthropogenic impacts defined by nine planetary boundaries if "unacceptable global change" is to be avoided. Chemical pollution was identified as one of those boundaries for which continued impacts could erode the resilience of ecosystems and humanity. The central concept of the planetary boundary (or boundaries) for chemical pollution (PBCP or PBCPs) is that the Earth has a finite assimilative capacity for chemical pollution, which includes persistent as well as readily degradable chemicals released at local to regional scales, which in aggregate threaten ecosystem and human viability. The PBCP allows humanity to explicitly address the increasingly global aspects of chemical pollution throughout a chemical's life cycle and the need for a global response of internationally coordinated control measures. We submit that sufficient evidence shows stresses on ecosystem and human health at local to global scales, suggesting that conditions are transgressing the safe operating space delimited by a PBCP. As such, current local to global pollution control measures are insufficient. The normative nature of a PBCP presents challenges of negotiating pollution limits amongst societal groups with differing viewpoints. Thus, a combination of approaches is recommended as follows: develop indicators of chemical pollution, for both control and response variables, that will aid in quantifying a PBCP(s) and gauging progress towards reducing chemical pollution; develop new technologies and technical and social approaches to mitigate global chemical pollution that emphasize a preventative approach; coordinate pollution control and sustainability efforts; and facilitate implementation of multiple (and potentially decentralized) control efforts involving scientists, civil society, government, non-governmental organizations and international bodies.