The history of science as the progress of human spirit: Historiography of astronomy in the 18th ...
ŠPELDA, Daniel. The history of science as the progress of human spirit: Historiography of astronomy in the 18th century. In Before Montucla: Historiography of Science in Early Modern Era. 2016. |
Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
|
Basic information | |
---|---|
Original name | The history of science as the progress of human spirit: Historiography of astronomy in the 18th century |
Name in Czech | Dějiny vědy jako pokrok lidského ducha: Historiografie astronomie v 18. století |
Name (in English) | The history of science as the progress of human spirit: Historiography of astronomy in the 18th century |
Authors | ŠPELDA, Daniel. |
Edition | Before Montucla: Historiography of Science in Early Modern Era, 2016. |
Other information | |
---|---|
Type of outcome | Requested lectures |
Confidentiality degree | is not subject to a state or trade secret |
Organization unit | Faculty of Arts |
Keywords (in Czech) | historiografie vědy; dějiny lidského ducha; dějiny astronomie |
Keywords in English | historiography of science; history of the human spirit; the history of astronomy |
Tags | International impact |
Changed by | Changed by: Mgr. Vendula Hromádková, učo 108933. Changed: 25/4/2019 18:31. |
Abstract |
---|
In this contribution, I analyze early histories of astronomy which began to appear during the 18th century, such as Cassini’s De l’origine et du progrès de l’astronomie (1699), Weidler’s De ortu et progressu astronomiae (1741), Heilbronner’s Historia matheseos (1741), Estève’s Histoire de l’astronomie (1755), Montucla’s Histoire des mathématiques (1758), Costard’s The History of Astronomy (1764), and Bailly’s Histoire de l’astronomie ancienne (1781). I focused on several specific questions arising after reading of these works. How did the historians and astronomers evaluate the historical importance of ancient astronomy? How did they imagine the origins of astronomy? How did they assess the persuasiveness of ancient heliocentrism (e.g. Pythagoreans, Aristarchus)? |
Abstract (in Czech) |
---|
V příspěvku se zabývá ranými dějinami astronomie, které se začaly objevovat během 18. století: Cassini - De l’origine et du progrès de l’astronomie (1699), Weidler - De ortu et progressu astronomiae (1741), Heilbronner - Historia matheseos (1741), Estève - Histoire de l’astronomie (1755), Montucla’s Histoire des mathématiques (1758), Costard - The History of Astronomy (1764), and Bailly - Histoire de l’astronomie ancienne (1781). Zaměřil jsem se na několik otázek, které vyvolává četba těchto děl: Jak astronomové oceňovali historický význam antické astronomie? Jak si představovali počátky astronomie? Jak potvrzovali přesvědčivost antického heliocentrismu? |
Abstract (in English) |
---|
In this contribution, I analyze early histories of astronomy which began to appear during the 18th century, such as Cassini’s De l’origine et du progrès de l’astronomie (1699), Weidler’s De ortu et progressu astronomiae (1741), Heilbronner’s Historia matheseos (1741), Estève’s Histoire de l’astronomie (1755), Montucla’s Histoire des mathématiques (1758), Costard’s The History of Astronomy (1764), and Bailly’s Histoire de l’astronomie ancienne (1781). I focused on several specific questions arising after reading of these works. How did the historians and astronomers evaluate the historical importance of ancient astronomy? How did they imagine the origins of astronomy? How did they assess the persuasiveness of ancient heliocentrism? |
Links | |
---|---|
MUNI/21/SPE/2016, interní kód MU | Name: Od pokroku vědy k pokroku lidstva |
Investor: Masaryk University |
PrintDisplayed: 9/10/2024 06:13