TURCSÁNYI, Richard, Rudolf FURST and Tamás MATURA. The Visegrad Countries' Political Relations with China. In Ágnes Szunomár. Chinese Investments and Financial Engagement in Visegrad Countries: Myth or Reality? Budapest: Institute of World Economics, 2014, p. 127-141. Centre for Economic and Regional Studies. ISBN 978-963-301-615-2.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name The Visegrad Countries' Political Relations with China
Authors TURCSÁNYI, Richard (703 Slovakia, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Rudolf FURST (203 Czech Republic) and Tamás MATURA (348 Hungary).
Edition Budapest, Chinese Investments and Financial Engagement in Visegrad Countries: Myth or Reality? p. 127-141, 15 pp. Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, 2014.
Publisher Institute of World Economics
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Chapter(s) of a specialized book
Field of Study 50601 Political science
Country of publisher Hungary
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form printed version "print"
WWW URL
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14230/14:00087075
Organization unit Faculty of Social Studies
ISBN 978-963-301-615-2
Keywords in English Visegrad countries; Chinese investments; Visegrad-China relations
Changed by Changed by: Ing. Mgr. Richard Turcsányi, Ph.D., učo 171930. Changed: 22/3/2016 05:42.
Abstract
Numerous theories have emerged on the true nature of the China-CEE cooperation in recent years. Some believe that China nurtures hidden The Visegrad countries’ Political Relations with China: Goals, results and prospects 137 5Interview with MEP Adrian Severin, 27 November 2013, European Parliament, Brussels. political intentions covered by business cooperation and even tries to divide Europe from the inside. Others say that the 16+1 is a purely economic cooperation fostering investment and trade relations. We have found that with the exception of SinoCzech relations there has not been any substantial change in the political relations between the V4 and China since 2012. That is mirrored by the lack of clear economic takeoff, although in economic exchange the four countries are still much ahead the rest of the group of CEE16. Politically the major improvement of the bilateral relations with Poland came in 2011, thus before the official kick-off of the 16+1 platform. Ever since then, Hungary has not experienced any significant increase in their political relations with Beijing and similar thing is truth for Slovakia.
PrintDisplayed: 26/4/2024 23:18