ŠMAJS, Josef. On the Principle of Evolutionary Ontology. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. Novosibirsk: Publishing House Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, 2016, vol. 1, No 2016, p. 78-86. ISSN 2226-3365. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1601.07.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name On the Principle of Evolutionary Ontology
Authors ŠMAJS, Josef (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, Novosibirsk, Publishing House Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, 2016, 2226-3365.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 60300 6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
Country of publisher Russian Federation
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14560/16:00089588
Organization unit Faculty of Economics and Administration
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1601.07
Keywords in English Evolutionary ontology; Traditional ontology; Evolution; Nature; Culture
Tags Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Daniela Marcollová, učo 111148. Changed: 24/3/2016 13:29.
Abstract
Evolutionary ontology differs from traditional ontology in the following aspects: 1. subject; 2. means of its interpretation; 3. social role. The abstractly understood natural being is the subject of traditional ontology. The ontically opposing artificial cultural being is, besides the natural being, the subject of evolutionary ontology. This is because its subject consists in the complete terrestrial reality, including the conflict between the Culture and the Nature. Traditional ontology, within the context of the natural being, preferred stability, passivity and reversibility, while evolutionary ontology emphasizes processes, ontical activity and non-reversibility; in compliance with reality it considers natural being to be an activity, to be a process powered by the residual energy of the Big Bang. Traditional ontology has been abstractly academic and individually comfortable; evolutionary ontology, which has revealed the principles of the global environmental crisis, could play a generally philosophical and culturally paradigmatic role.
PrintDisplayed: 29/9/2024 08:34